Bigotry?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #17,068 by imric 11/6/01 10:51:25 PM Reply	Bigotry? Because I suspect something I cannot prove? OK. Tell me, do you come from NJ, where 'everything is legal, as long as you don't get caught'? This settlement is being treated differently than the others. By the press, and by the States. Tell me why. Imric's Tips for Living Paranoia Is a Survival Trait Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised... Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.
Post #17,072 by addison 11/6/01 11:11:39 PM Reply	Bigotry. Because I suspect something I cannot prove? Because you've blamed Bush, despite having been shown proof that Bush has had nothing to do with 2 prior settlements, and I claim at least 2 more tha I didn't link to. Now, yes, Bush has control of the AG, and presumably he could keep them from attempting a stupid settlement. But you've said that "since Bush was elected" - despite the SAME EXACT issue being pursued EXACTLY THE SAME. What the hell else is that but utter bigotry? "Its all Bush's fault". This settlement is being treated differently than the others. By the press, and by the States. Not from what I can tell. DoJ made a stupid proposal, doesn't affect MS, press reported it, some ridiculed it, states balked. 2 priors in this thread of EXACTLY this behavior. WHAT is different? Addison
Post #17,074 by boxley 11/6/01 11:49:03 PM Reply	umm err BG paid a lot of dough since the original indictment to both dems and repos, why are you surprised the payola worked? This was/is a shakedown thanx, bill tshirt front "born to die before I get old" thshirt back "fscked another one didnja?"

To the conservative element here - (Silverlock) - (99) - Nov. 2, 2001, 03:48:58 PM EST

Listen for the silence. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 2, 2001, 07:16:28 PM EST

chirp, chirp................ chirp, chirp............. -NT - (n3jja) - Nov. 2, 2001, 10:31:21 PM EST

He also would not answer any "technical" questions. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Nov. 2, 2001, 08:55:25 PM EST

Once again, the UK explains our government, incest, and M$: - (Ashton) - Nov. 2, 2001, 09:48:03 PM EST

Errfff - (wharris2) - (1) - Nov. 2, 2001, 11:31:35 PM EST

Ahem, some of us did. -NT -NT - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 4, 2001, 10:20:54 PM EST

Huh? - (bepatient) - (73) - Nov. 3, 2001, 12:54:39 AM EST

Seconded - (wharris2) - Nov. 3, 2001, 09:37:10 AM EST

"completely unforseen events" - (Brandioch) - (70) - Nov. 4, 2001, 01:48:32 PM EST

Don't think so... - (bepatient) - (68) - Nov. 4, 2001, 07:28:20 PM EST

Sooner? - (Brandioch) - (59) - Nov. 4, 2001, 07:47:58 PM EST

Before the election, even. - (addison) - (58) - Nov. 4, 2001, 11:35:59 PM EST

Re: Before the election, even. - (bepatient) - Nov. 5, 2001, 02:02:07 AM EST

I can. - (jb4) - (1) - Nov. 5, 2001, 10:17:50 AM EST

No, you can't. - (addison) - Nov. 5, 2001, 11:33:16 AM EST

Refresh my memory. - (Brandioch) - (54) - Nov. 5, 2001, 11:31:25 AM EST

Yep. - (addison) - (53) - Nov. 5, 2001, 11:37:39 AM EST

Some refreshment. - (addison) - (52) - Nov. 5, 2001, 11:50:24 AM EST

Are we using different definitions? - (Brandioch) - (51) - Nov. 5, 2001, 02:38:15 PM EST

I have no idea what you're using. - (addison) - (50) - Nov. 5, 2001, 02:47:43 PM EST

Whatever. - (Brandioch) - (48) - Nov. 5, 2001, 04:46:05 PM EST

Re: Whatever. - (addison) - (47) - Nov. 5, 2001, 05:09:54 PM EST

Again, whatever. - (Brandioch) - (46) - Nov. 5, 2001, 06:00:48 PM EST

Earth to Brandioch...... - (addison) - (45) - Nov. 5, 2001, 06:21:31 PM EST

Again, whatever. - (Brandioch) - (44) - Nov. 5, 2001, 06:47:40 PM EST

Hrm. - (addison) - (43) - Nov. 5, 2001, 07:57:08 PM EST

Of course its his fault... - (bepatient) - (42) - Nov. 5, 2001, 09:47:44 PM EST

Well... - (imric) - (41) - Nov. 6, 2001, 09:42:54 AM EST

Re: Well... - (addison) - (29) - Nov. 6, 2001, 10:31:04 AM EST

So - why are the States now 'ignorable'? You didn't answer. - (imric) - (28) - Nov. 6, 2001, 06:58:54 PM EST

Yes, I did.. and if you want to count tally sheets, - (addison) - (27) - Nov. 6, 2001, 10:07:36 PM EST

Tally sheets? Bush has no control over the AG? - (imric) - (26) - Nov. 6, 2001, 10:48:15 PM EST

Have you been sleepposting? - (addison) - (25) - Nov. 6, 2001, 11:06:19 PM EST

Zzxzzzzzz.... - (imric) - (9) - Nov. 7, 2001, 10:05:19 AM EST

Re: Zzxzzzzzz.... - (addison) - (8) - Nov. 7, 2001, 11:50:12 AM EST

Woulda, coulda, shoulda. - (imric) - (7) - Nov. 7, 2001, 01:18:59 PM EST

Re: Woulda, coulda, shoulda. - (addison) - (6) - Nov. 7, 2001, 04:47:58 PM EST

Minor logic problem.... - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 7, 2001, 07:17:21 PM EST

Contrast? - (imric) - (4) - Nov. 7, 2001, 07:33:55 PM EST

<Evil Grin> - (Simon_Jester) - (3) - Nov. 7, 2001, 07:46:55 PM EST

It is a Cruel World. -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 7, 2001, 09:16:44 PM EST

Bingo! - (jb4) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2001, 08:21:36 AM EST

I really don't know... - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 8, 2001, 09:17:27 AM EST

The big difference.... - (admin) - (14) - Nov. 7, 2001, 10:13:55 AM EST

That's true, but... - (addison) - (13) - Nov. 7, 2001, 11:37:21 AM EST

I think you just like to argue. - (admin) - (12) - Nov. 7, 2001, 11:59:28 AM EST

Yeah, ban him for being so insensitively diruptive! - (CRConrad) - Nov. 7, 2001, 12:04:02 PM EST

Its possible.. - (addison) - (10) - Nov. 7, 2001, 01:07:04 PM EST

Re: Its possible.. - (admin) - (5) - Nov. 7, 2001, 02:02:54 PM EST

Er. No. - (addison) - (4) - Nov. 7, 2001, 04:33:25 PM EST

Re: Er. No. - (admin) - (3) - Nov. 7, 2001, 05:31:03 PM EST

Really? - (addison) - (2) - Nov. 7, 2001, 06:05:56 PM EST

Re: Really? - (admin) - (1) - Nov. 7, 2001, 06:24:00 PM EST

Oi. - (pwhysall) - Nov. 7, 2001, 07:01:00 PM EST

There may be one huge difference between then and now.... - (Simon_Jester) - (3) - Nov. 7, 2001, 02:30:05 PM EST

If that's true, - (addison) - (2) - Nov. 7, 2001, 04:50:28 PM EST

But we do know... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Nov. 7, 2001, 07:58:59 PM EST

More quotes. - (Another Scott) - Nov. 8, 2001, 12:56:44 PM EST

*SNORT* - (Silverlock) - Nov. 6, 2001, 10:39:42 AM EST

Brett Glass predictions. - (bepatient) - (5) - Nov. 6, 2001, 10:52:10 AM EST

ROFL - (imric) - (4) - Nov. 6, 2001, 07:19:05 PM EST

Re: ROFL - (addison) - (3) - Nov. 6, 2001, 10:02:15 PM EST

Bigotry? - (imric) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 10:51:25 PM EST

Bigotry. - (addison) - Nov. 6, 2001, 11:11:39 PM EST

umm err - (boxley) - Nov. 6, 2001, 11:49:03 PM EST

They aren't - (Steve Lowe) - (3) - Nov. 6, 2001, 11:03:20 AM EST

One other scenario. - (Brandioch) - Nov. 6, 2001, 01:01:52 PM EST

Oh, I really do live by my 'Tips for Living'. - (imric) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 07:30:24 PM EST

In that case - (Steve Lowe) - Nov. 7, 2001, 01:30:37 AM EST

Say WHAT? - (jb4) - Nov. 7, 2001, 06:43:27 PM EST

How is the market going to do "what it's supposed to do"... - (jb4) - (7) - Nov. 5, 2001, 10:10:25 AM EST

Umm... - (bepatient) - (6) - Nov. 5, 2001, 11:22:56 AM EST

OK, fine... - (jb4) - (5) - Nov. 5, 2001, 02:42:52 PM EST

Nope, not fine. - (addison) - (4) - Nov. 5, 2001, 02:40:41 PM EST

Glad... - (bepatient) - Nov. 5, 2001, 03:37:53 PM EST

Not not fine - (jb4) - (2) - Nov. 6, 2001, 12:58:02 PM EST

Not^3 fine - (addison) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2001, 04:13:07 PM EST

I am so glad that you have explained that the Marketing - (Ashton) - Nov. 6, 2001, 07:20:06 PM EST

Evil Parody... - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 4, 2001, 10:23:15 PM EST

I never even said that much in his defense. - (marlowe) - Nov. 4, 2001, 07:59:41 PM EST

Re: To the conservative element here - (Squidley) - (6) - Nov. 3, 2001, 01:30:52 AM EST

What a charming idea.. I do hope someone has expressed it - (Ashton) - (5) - Nov. 3, 2001, 02:13:01 AM EST

Why, thank you! - (Squidley) - (2) - Nov. 3, 2001, 08:54:03 AM EST

Wag-Ed - (wharris2) - Nov. 3, 2001, 09:39:52 AM EST

cuba libras launched from both nostrils ROFL!! - (boxley) - Nov. 4, 2001, 07:23:42 PM EST

How progressive! - (marlowe) - (1) - Nov. 4, 2001, 08:06:12 PM EST

Re: How progressive! - (jb4) - Nov. 5, 2001, 10:22:35 AM EST

why do you think gore's choice would be any different? - (boxley) - (10) - Nov. 4, 2001, 07:42:47 PM EST

Shit, bill, that's easy - (jb4) - (9) - Nov. 5, 2001, 10:02:21 AM EST

didnt read the post :) -NT - (boxley) - (8) - Nov. 5, 2001, 10:03:48 AM EST

Read it...doesn't matter - (jb4) - (7) - Nov. 5, 2001, 10:14:12 AM EST

microsoft was targeted because they wouldnt make payoffs - (boxley) - (6) - Nov. 5, 2001, 11:09:42 AM EST

Possible. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Nov. 5, 2001, 11:34:56 AM EST

I wouldn't call it extremely well... - (inthane-chan) - (2) - Nov. 5, 2001, 04:18:32 PM EST

Should have qualified that a bit. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 5, 2001, 04:54:20 PM EST

Agreed on both counts. :) -NT - (inthane-chan) - Nov. 5, 2001, 05:08:09 PM EST

Re: microsoft was targeted because they wouldnt make payoffs - (jb4) - (1) - Nov. 5, 2001, 02:42:15 PM EST

Yes Ashole is aptly named and sh*t fer brains - (boxley) - Nov. 5, 2001, 09:15:35 PM EST

Ashhole: Minister of Doublespeak - (jb4) - Nov. 5, 2001, 09:55:29 AM EST

iwethey.org

I say first, medicinal wine from a teaspoon, then beer from a bottle!
145 ms