IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Open Forum / Personally... (edited)
Post #168,889
by folkert
Picture of folkert
8/12/04 12:03:30 PM
8/12/04 12:13:33 PM
Reply
New Personally... (edited)
As with all thing, there should be an option for it, err preference.

[ ] enable Real "Mark Forums Read"

or

[ ] Make sure I am not an "MFR" ID10T

or

[ ] "Dammit, why the Hell is Chess back again?" Prevention.

or

[ ] Keep me from shooting myself in the foot

or

[ ] Enable "work productivity gains" link
    [ ] Enable link name change to "Get back to work you slacker!"
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
Here is an example: [link|http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm001-ie/|Executing arbitrary commands without Active Scripting or ActiveX when using Windows]


P.S. Box that was GREAT! I added it.
Expand Edited by folkert Aug. 12, 2004, 12:13:33 PM EDT
Expand All History
Post #168,891
by boxley
8/12/04 12:09:16 PM
Reply
New I would like to get some productivity numbers
new feature stops error of mark all read. Without this feature how much worked productivity was gained by inadvertantly marking all read.
thanx,
bill
"delayed incessantly by people whose prevalent qualification was an excess of free-time" Philip Atkinson
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
     Why am I bothered with this . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (55) - Aug. 12, 2004, 03:51:29 AM EDT
         IIRC there were quite a few 'Oops! Damn!' posts - (Meerkat) - (2) - Aug. 12, 2004, 04:03:19 AM EDT
             ..and this explains why most software sucks - (deSitter) - (1) - Aug. 12, 2004, 04:16:18 AM EDT
                 "patently ridiculous" - (admin) - Aug. 12, 2004, 08:48:58 AM EDT
         Agreed, I hated it from nanosecond 1 - (deSitter) - (30) - Aug. 12, 2004, 04:14:35 AM EDT
             Hello and welcome to IWhingeThey - (Meerkat) - (29) - Aug. 12, 2004, 05:46:47 AM EDT
                 Re: Hello and welcome to IWhingeThey - (deSitter) - (28) - Aug. 12, 2004, 06:08:29 AM EDT
                     Forgive me Sir, I forgot I was one of the stupid. I bow,etc. -NT - (Meerkat) - Aug. 12, 2004, 07:02:36 AM EDT
                     You like Windows 95. - (pwhysall) - (26) - Aug. 12, 2004, 07:03:57 AM EDT
                         pwned. -NT - (inthane-chan) - Aug. 12, 2004, 11:02:29 AM EDT
                         Years ago - (deSitter) - (24) - Aug. 12, 2004, 03:14:18 PM EDT
                             You Talk Toss. - (pwhysall) - (23) - Aug. 12, 2004, 03:27:36 PM EDT
                                 Re: You Talk Toss. - (deSitter) - (22) - Aug. 12, 2004, 03:29:20 PM EDT
                                     OS/2's CONFIG.SYS gives the lie to that. - (pwhysall) - (21) - Aug. 12, 2004, 03:32:19 PM EDT
                                         Re: OS/2's CONFIG.SYS gives the lie to that. - (deSitter) - (2) - Aug. 12, 2004, 03:41:24 PM EDT
                                             If it was easy, why didn't IBM bother to do so? -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - Aug. 12, 2004, 05:02:46 PM EDT
                                                 Graphical CONFIG.SYS Editor - (lister) - Aug. 16, 2004, 09:18:26 AM EDT
                                         Interface is beautiful, easy to use, and fast. - (imric) - (17) - Aug. 12, 2004, 03:43:16 PM EDT
                                             OS/2 is dead. Deader n' disco. Gone the way of the platform - (pwhysall) - (16) - Aug. 12, 2004, 05:00:52 PM EDT
                                                 ICLRPD - (Arkadiy) - Aug. 12, 2004, 05:03:34 PM EDT
                                                 Not as long at there are mainframes - (broomberg) - Aug. 12, 2004, 08:30:02 PM EDT
                                                 I disagree - (jake123) - (8) - Aug. 13, 2004, 10:09:27 AM EDT
                                                     You're wrestling with a pig, Jack. - (n3jja) - (7) - Aug. 13, 2004, 11:52:52 PM EDT
                                                         I'm still running an old Acorn box with RISCOS. - (pwhysall) - (6) - Aug. 14, 2004, 01:02:07 AM EDT
                                                             *YAWN* -NT - (n3jja) - (5) - Aug. 14, 2004, 09:40:14 AM EDT
                                                                 YHBT. YHL. HAND. - (pwhysall) - (4) - Aug. 14, 2004, 10:02:33 AM EDT
                                                                     Oi! Lay off! How dare you! Amiga is...oh, heh, you're right! -NT - (Meerkat) - Aug. 14, 2004, 11:39:10 AM EDT
                                                                     WordStar 7 on CP/M on Otrona: FOREVER!____bloody heathens -NT - (Ashton) - (2) - Aug. 14, 2004, 06:55:51 PM EDT
                                                                         forpro on fortunes, multiuser done right -NT - (boxley) - Aug. 14, 2004, 07:19:10 PM EDT
                                                                         GEOS on C64 43v4R! -NT - (inthane-chan) - Aug. 14, 2004, 07:46:21 PM EDT
                                                 Are not (were not?) most ATMs OS/2 -- re obv stability. -NT - (Ashton) - (4) - Aug. 13, 2004, 04:22:35 PM EDT
                                                     The Diebold ATMs were . Now NT :-( -NT - (hnick) - Aug. 13, 2004, 04:34:47 PM EDT
                                                     Not anymore - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Aug. 13, 2004, 07:01:29 PM EDT
                                                         ICLRPD (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Aug. 13, 2004, 08:19:19 PM EDT
                                                     Were. - (pwhysall) - Aug. 13, 2004, 11:02:06 PM EDT
         Maybe request a check box in Edit Preferences? :-p -NT - (Another Scott) - Aug. 12, 2004, 08:25:50 AM EDT
         Re: Why am I bothered with this . . . - (admin) - (16) - Aug. 12, 2004, 08:46:14 AM EDT
             Keep up the good work Scott - (jbrabeck) - (1) - Aug. 12, 2004, 09:41:15 AM EDT
                 No one admires his efforts and skill more than I do - (deSitter) - Aug. 12, 2004, 03:17:50 PM EDT
             Agreed - (broomberg) - (5) - Aug. 12, 2004, 11:18:30 AM EDT
                 Far better solution - (deSitter) - (4) - Aug. 12, 2004, 03:20:16 PM EDT
                     Re: Far better solution - (admin) - (3) - Aug. 12, 2004, 04:36:16 PM EDT
                         FFF. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Aug. 12, 2004, 05:01:32 PM EDT
                             ... which is why I rarely complain about a feature. :-) - (static) - Aug. 16, 2004, 07:37:31 AM EDT
                         Almost what I said! - (broomberg) - Aug. 12, 2004, 08:27:16 PM EDT
             see: [post://168889] for suggestion. - (folkert) - Aug. 12, 2004, 12:06:23 PM EDT
             Geez, don't I get to bitch a little now and then? - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - Aug. 12, 2004, 02:59:07 PM EDT
                 You *and* Ross set me off. - (admin) - (4) - Aug. 12, 2004, 04:39:13 PM EDT
                     Well, I certainly apologize for the offense . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Aug. 12, 2004, 05:10:29 PM EDT
                         Re: Well, I certainly apologize for the offense . . - (admin) - (1) - Aug. 12, 2004, 05:14:44 PM EDT
                             It's a good thing he didn't complain about the dirty knife. - (ChrisR) - Aug. 12, 2004, 05:26:21 PM EDT
                     Re: You *and* Ross set me off. - (deSitter) - Aug. 12, 2004, 11:02:50 PM EDT
             I'm just curious - (Nightowl) - Aug. 12, 2004, 05:38:24 PM EDT
         Personally... (edited) - (folkert) - (1) - Aug. 12, 2004, 12:13:33 PM EDT
             I would like to get some productivity numbers - (boxley) - Aug. 12, 2004, 12:09:16 PM EDT
         Did I mention? (new thread) - (Ashton) - Aug. 12, 2004, 06:53:22 PM EDT

This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels.
90 ms