IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: Why am I bothered with this . . .
1) Whine.
2) This software is on its last legs anyway, so I'm not inclined to spend a lot of time on it any longer.
3) The "mark read until" feature is more useful than the "mark all read" feature.
4) *Lots* of people complained about the one-click oh-crap I-didn't-really-want-to-do-that nature of "mark all read". It's not "Windows software" now. was a bad design in the first place.
5) This was the quickest way add 3 and fix 4.
6) I'm much more inclined to listen to things like "this sucks, here's a better idea" than "this sucks, *whine*". Get the hint?

I know programmers can't leave something that works alone
I call bullshit on this one. Some things should be improved. Other things I do leave alone. I also occasionally try things out to see how they float. This is one of those things that stuck because a lot more people like the new way than the old way.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New Keep up the good work Scott
I, for one, appreciate the efforts you have invested in this forum.

While I understand Andrew's complaint, and I agree with him, I too, have hit the Mark All Forum Read button by mistake and am willing to "suffer" with the confirmation instead of trying to figure out what I marked read by mistake.

I also like the ability to "hide" forums that I never read with the "Mark Read Until" feature. Best thing ever. Of course imnsho.

Carry on...
A good friend will come and bail you out of jail ... but, a true friend will be sitting next to you saying, "Damn...that was fun!"
New No one admires his efforts and skill more than I do
I can't understand how he could build a perfect UI for a forum and then kludge it that way. It's like a Rembrandt with a stick figure in the corner.

Of course as a programmer I doubt Scott has many equals. I imagine all the people who built Windows NT were individually great programmers. So how did the collective effort turn out so badly?

One word, committees. The best software is usually the creation of one or two people without demands other than their own desire to solve the problem.
-drl
New Agreed
And I'm typically a whiner.
Irrevocable actions that cause a lot of things to change that are used by a variety of people should have an "Are you sure?" by default. If you wanted to add a user specific bypass, fine. If not, don't.
New Far better solution
..would have been a confirmation popup, or a rollback to the previous state, given the testiness over popups. The latter idea is probably the "correct" way to do it.

See the UI Hall of Shame for more examples of going astray with user reqs.
-drl
New Re: Far better solution
You're pretty free with scheduling my time. A rollback? Screw that. The current hack took 5 minutes, removed the problem a lot of users were having, and added significantly useful functionality.

This is a PROTOTYPE.

It isn't the final PRODUCT.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New FFF.
AKA "Patches accepted".


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
New ... which is why I rarely complain about a feature. :-)
Unless I have a constructicve suggestion.

Wade.

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please

-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

New Almost what I said!
Rollback? Screw you!
New see: [post://168889] for suggestion.
[link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=168889|Post #168889]
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
Here is an example: [link|http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm001-ie/|Executing arbitrary commands without Active Scripting or ActiveX when using Windows]
New Geez, don't I get to bitch a little now and then?
The reason I didn't think up suggestions is I really don't expect anything to be done about it, since I'm aware others have praised this feature. The bitch was just to influence future decisions.

On the other hand I have to wait for the new screen to appear instead of just going on to wherever I intend to go to, and the delay is long enough that every once in a while I notice there's a new post - but my finger is already executing the "mark all" stroke so it gets marked as read too.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New You *and* Ross set me off.
I'm not a big fan of "this sucks, fix it" complaints. Either give me constructive criticism, or at least admit that it's a reasonable hack given the amount of time I had to spend on it vs. the usability it added for the majority of users.

Bitches don't influence future decisions. Polite requests or "votes", preferably with constructive suggestions, do influence future decisions.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New Well, I certainly apologize for the offense . .
. . it wasn't intended to be taken at all seriously. I will be more careful in the future.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New Re: Well, I certainly apologize for the offense . .
I generally take complaints about the software here pretty seriously.... ;-)
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New It's a good thing he didn't complain about the dirty knife.
[link|http://www.ibras.dk/montypython/episode03.htm#5|MPFC] reference of course.
New Re: You *and* Ross set me off.
I believe brilliant people...
-drl
New I'm just curious
I don't see a lot different, other than once in awhile if I choose not to read a forum, and mark it read instead, it kicks me to that page with all those forums listed and the mark all read. Is that the "really mark all read" part? I only get it every now and then, if it is. :)

I'm very happy with the way the software works.

Nightowl >8#



"A determined soul will do more with a rusty monkey wrench than a loafer will accomplish with all the tools in a machine shop." -- Robert Hughes, Australian Art Critic, Writer
     Why am I bothered with this . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (55)
         IIRC there were quite a few 'Oops! Damn!' posts - (Meerkat) - (2)
             ..and this explains why most software sucks - (deSitter) - (1)
                 "patently ridiculous" - (admin)
         Agreed, I hated it from nanosecond 1 - (deSitter) - (30)
             Hello and welcome to IWhingeThey - (Meerkat) - (29)
                 Re: Hello and welcome to IWhingeThey - (deSitter) - (28)
                     Forgive me Sir, I forgot I was one of the stupid. I bow,etc. -NT - (Meerkat)
                     You like Windows 95. - (pwhysall) - (26)
                         pwned. -NT - (inthane-chan)
                         Years ago - (deSitter) - (24)
                             You Talk Toss. - (pwhysall) - (23)
                                 Re: You Talk Toss. - (deSitter) - (22)
                                     OS/2's CONFIG.SYS gives the lie to that. - (pwhysall) - (21)
                                         Re: OS/2's CONFIG.SYS gives the lie to that. - (deSitter) - (2)
                                             If it was easy, why didn't IBM bother to do so? -NT - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                                 Graphical CONFIG.SYS Editor - (lister)
                                         Interface is beautiful, easy to use, and fast. - (imric) - (17)
                                             OS/2 is dead. Deader n' disco. Gone the way of the platform - (pwhysall) - (16)
                                                 ICLRPD - (Arkadiy)
                                                 Not as long at there are mainframes - (broomberg)
                                                 I disagree - (jake123) - (8)
                                                     You're wrestling with a pig, Jack. - (n3jja) - (7)
                                                         I'm still running an old Acorn box with RISCOS. - (pwhysall) - (6)
                                                             *YAWN* -NT - (n3jja) - (5)
                                                                 YHBT. YHL. HAND. - (pwhysall) - (4)
                                                                     Oi! Lay off! How dare you! Amiga is...oh, heh, you're right! -NT - (Meerkat)
                                                                     WordStar 7 on CP/M on Otrona: FOREVER!____bloody heathens -NT - (Ashton) - (2)
                                                                         forpro on fortunes, multiuser done right -NT - (boxley)
                                                                         GEOS on C64 43v4R! -NT - (inthane-chan)
                                                 Are not (were not?) most ATMs OS/2 -- re obv stability. -NT - (Ashton) - (4)
                                                     The Diebold ATMs were . Now NT :-( -NT - (hnick)
                                                     Not anymore - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                                                         ICLRPD (new thread) - (Another Scott)
                                                     Were. - (pwhysall)
         Maybe request a check box in Edit Preferences? :-p -NT - (Another Scott)
         Re: Why am I bothered with this . . . - (admin) - (16)
             Keep up the good work Scott - (jbrabeck) - (1)
                 No one admires his efforts and skill more than I do - (deSitter)
             Agreed - (broomberg) - (5)
                 Far better solution - (deSitter) - (4)
                     Re: Far better solution - (admin) - (3)
                         FFF. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                             ... which is why I rarely complain about a feature. :-) - (static)
                         Almost what I said! - (broomberg)
             see: [post://168889] for suggestion. - (folkert)
             Geez, don't I get to bitch a little now and then? - (Andrew Grygus) - (5)
                 You *and* Ross set me off. - (admin) - (4)
                     Well, I certainly apologize for the offense . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                         Re: Well, I certainly apologize for the offense . . - (admin) - (1)
                             It's a good thing he didn't complain about the dirty knife. - (ChrisR)
                     Re: You *and* Ross set me off. - (deSitter)
             I'm just curious - (Nightowl)
         Personally... (edited) - (folkert) - (1)
             I would like to get some productivity numbers - (boxley)
         Did I mention? (new thread) - (Ashton)

My other car isn't worth talking about.
87 ms