IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Keep up the good work Scott
I, for one, appreciate the efforts you have invested in this forum.

While I understand Andrew's complaint, and I agree with him, I too, have hit the Mark All Forum Read button by mistake and am willing to "suffer" with the confirmation instead of trying to figure out what I marked read by mistake.

I also like the ability to "hide" forums that I never read with the "Mark Read Until" feature. Best thing ever. Of course imnsho.

Carry on...
A good friend will come and bail you out of jail ... but, a true friend will be sitting next to you saying, "Damn...that was fun!"
New No one admires his efforts and skill more than I do
I can't understand how he could build a perfect UI for a forum and then kludge it that way. It's like a Rembrandt with a stick figure in the corner.

Of course as a programmer I doubt Scott has many equals. I imagine all the people who built Windows NT were individually great programmers. So how did the collective effort turn out so badly?

One word, committees. The best software is usually the creation of one or two people without demands other than their own desire to solve the problem.
-drl
     Why am I bothered with this . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (55)
         IIRC there were quite a few 'Oops! Damn!' posts - (Meerkat) - (2)
             ..and this explains why most software sucks - (deSitter) - (1)
                 "patently ridiculous" - (admin)
         Agreed, I hated it from nanosecond 1 - (deSitter) - (30)
             Hello and welcome to IWhingeThey - (Meerkat) - (29)
                 Re: Hello and welcome to IWhingeThey - (deSitter) - (28)
                     Forgive me Sir, I forgot I was one of the stupid. I bow,etc. -NT - (Meerkat)
                     You like Windows 95. - (pwhysall) - (26)
                         pwned. -NT - (inthane-chan)
                         Years ago - (deSitter) - (24)
                             You Talk Toss. - (pwhysall) - (23)
                                 Re: You Talk Toss. - (deSitter) - (22)
                                     OS/2's CONFIG.SYS gives the lie to that. - (pwhysall) - (21)
                                         Re: OS/2's CONFIG.SYS gives the lie to that. - (deSitter) - (2)
                                             If it was easy, why didn't IBM bother to do so? -NT - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                                 Graphical CONFIG.SYS Editor - (lister)
                                         Interface is beautiful, easy to use, and fast. - (imric) - (17)
                                             OS/2 is dead. Deader n' disco. Gone the way of the platform - (pwhysall) - (16)
                                                 ICLRPD - (Arkadiy)
                                                 Not as long at there are mainframes - (broomberg)
                                                 I disagree - (jake123) - (8)
                                                     You're wrestling with a pig, Jack. - (n3jja) - (7)
                                                         I'm still running an old Acorn box with RISCOS. - (pwhysall) - (6)
                                                             *YAWN* -NT - (n3jja) - (5)
                                                                 YHBT. YHL. HAND. - (pwhysall) - (4)
                                                                     Oi! Lay off! How dare you! Amiga is...oh, heh, you're right! -NT - (Meerkat)
                                                                     WordStar 7 on CP/M on Otrona: FOREVER!____bloody heathens -NT - (Ashton) - (2)
                                                                         forpro on fortunes, multiuser done right -NT - (boxley)
                                                                         GEOS on C64 43v4R! -NT - (inthane-chan)
                                                 Are not (were not?) most ATMs OS/2 -- re obv stability. -NT - (Ashton) - (4)
                                                     The Diebold ATMs were . Now NT :-( -NT - (hnick)
                                                     Not anymore - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                                                         ICLRPD (new thread) - (Another Scott)
                                                     Were. - (pwhysall)
         Maybe request a check box in Edit Preferences? :-p -NT - (Another Scott)
         Re: Why am I bothered with this . . . - (admin) - (16)
             Keep up the good work Scott - (jbrabeck) - (1)
                 No one admires his efforts and skill more than I do - (deSitter)
             Agreed - (broomberg) - (5)
                 Far better solution - (deSitter) - (4)
                     Re: Far better solution - (admin) - (3)
                         FFF. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                             ... which is why I rarely complain about a feature. :-) - (static)
                         Almost what I said! - (broomberg)
             see: [post://168889] for suggestion. - (folkert)
             Geez, don't I get to bitch a little now and then? - (Andrew Grygus) - (5)
                 You *and* Ross set me off. - (admin) - (4)
                     Well, I certainly apologize for the offense . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                         Re: Well, I certainly apologize for the offense . . - (admin) - (1)
                             It's a good thing he didn't complain about the dirty knife. - (ChrisR)
                     Re: You *and* Ross set me off. - (deSitter)
             I'm just curious - (Nightowl)
         Personally... (edited) - (folkert) - (1)
             I would like to get some productivity numbers - (boxley)
         Did I mention? (new thread) - (Ashton)

Kinda I want to.
71 ms