By comparison:

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #137,931 by admin 1/26/04 5:03:27 PM Reply	By comparison: Your IQ score is 140 This number is based on a scientific formula that compares how many questions you answered correctly on the Classic IQ Test relative to others. Your Intellectual Type is Visionary Philosopher. This means you are highly intelligent and have a powerful mix of skills and insight that can be applied in a variety of different ways. Like Plato, your exceptional math and verbal skills make you very adept at explaining things to others \ufffd and at anticipating and predicting patterns. And that's just some of what we know about you from your IQ results. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #137,942 by deSitter 1/26/04 5:11:39 PM Reply	gotta be timed My guess - the scores are weighted by throwing out 1 correct and 1 incorrect answer (or perhaps 2 incorrect) from each half (verbal and math), then 1 point per minute is deducted past a certain time. Each correct answer is worth 4. If you answer them as fast as possible the highest score is probably thus 144 (= 160 - 16 worth of toss). -drl
Post #137,943 by admin 1/26/04 5:12:59 PM Reply	Couldn't possibly be timed. I was popping back to the test every 5 minutes or so to do another question while I was waiting for compiles to complete. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #137,944 by deSitter 1/26/04 5:15:26 PM Reply	Re: Couldn't possibly be timed. Then how can scores differ by 2? Not enough questions. -drl
Post #137,953 by broomberg 1/26/04 5:33:39 PM Reply	Different weightings They determine values for particluar questions.

Cute IQ test - (broomberg) - (95) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:47:25 PM EST

Heh - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:13:44 PM EST

My score - (orion) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:14:22 PM EST

It's vacuous - (deSitter) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:29:28 PM EST

Only when someone you don't like scores well - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:35:00 PM EST

Re: Only when someone you don't like scores well - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:35:59 PM EST

I got it - (orion) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:09:16 PM EST

Being a Gemini - (orion) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:09:58 PM EST

Got "document contains no data" for my trouble. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (8) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:16:01 PM EST

you mean your brain? -NT - (deSitter) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:34:21 PM EST

ROFL! - (a6l6e6x) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:38:15 PM EST

Standard problem with these tests - (broomberg) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:54:45 PM EST

Re: Standard problem with these tests - (deSitter) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:00:30 PM EST

Some cultural bias. - (admin) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:02:47 PM EST

Top high end never test well - (broomberg) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:15:21 PM EST

Survival skill = intelligence? - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:20:46 PM EST

KISS - (Ashton) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:09:31 PM EST

brain brammage - (boxley) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:23:23 PM EST

Ditto on that. - (folkert) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:24:00 PM EST

I like the pattern progression - (broomberg) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:31:21 PM EST

Re: I like the pattern progression - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:49:25 PM EST

No... - (folkert) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:51:14 PM EST

Mensa entry was 140 - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:05:19 PM EST

ObGroucho - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:07:55 PM EST

Ditto on the ditto - (bepatient) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:47 PM EST

Stupid test. - (admin) - (20) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:00:09 PM EST

Yes but - (broomberg) - (19) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:09:18 PM EST

That's why you have specific tests - (deSitter) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:12:50 PM EST

Math? - (broomberg) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:20:57 PM EST

Made my point - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:25:28 PM EST

car problem - (Steve Lowe) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:28:45 PM EST

I knew the name - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:36:47 PM EST

Uhh... Yeah! - (folkert) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:37:47 PM EST

Yers is prettier, mine is wordier :) -NT - (Steve Lowe) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:33 PM EST

Easier. - (Another Scott) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:08 PM EST

That's why you need someone to give the test. -NT - (admin) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:14:57 PM EST

Another problem with this test: - (admin) - (9) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:16:18 PM EST

Agreed - (broomberg) - (8) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:26:20 PM EST

I think the max on this one is probably fairly low. -NT - (admin) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:32:58 PM EST

Agreed - (broomberg) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:42:29 PM EST

By comparison: - (admin) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:27 PM EST

gotta be timed - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:11:39 PM EST

Couldn't possibly be timed. - (admin) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:12:59 PM EST

Re: Couldn't possibly be timed. - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:15:26 PM EST

Different weightings - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:33:39 PM EST

Agreed - Dupe - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:46:15 PM EST

133 - (Steve Lowe) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:03:57 PM EST

133 - same here, but I'm an 'Insightful Linguist' apparently - (Meerkat) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:30:41 PM EST

Good way to waste time. Addendum. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:51:47 PM EST

sqrt (-1) - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:43:54 PM EST

Feh - (cforde) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:55 PM EST

Re: Cute IQ test - (Nightowl) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:49:43 PM EST

142 - I'm a "Visionary Philosopher". Sheesh. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:06 PM EST

I can live with "your Intellectual Type is a Facts Curator". - (CRConrad) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:01 PM EST

135 means you didn't get any wrong. -NT - (FuManChu) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:16 PM EST

How is that possible? -NT - (admin) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:04:10 PM EST

It was my score, and I didn't get any wrong. :D -NT - (FuManChu) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:04:56 PM EST

Nope. Scott and Ben both beat us. -NT - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:34:55 PM EST

Got it up to 144 - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:44:04 PM EST

QED :) -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:45:42 PM EST

They got higher scores, not the same thing. -NT - (FuManChu) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:01:44 PM EST

Cosmic rays -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:05:28 PM EST

Those are GMAT questions - (tuberculosis) - (6) - Aug. 21, 2007, 12:43:43 PM EDT

What's that? - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:06:32 PM EST

*snicker* - (admin) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:07:28 PM EST

Yup, and you KNOW how big mine is - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:28:00 PM EST

100 * squares - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:35:01 PM EST

As Ben screams in the distance - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:39:11 PM EST

Perfect squares -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:35:27 PM EST

I didn't take the time to take it. So do I pass? -NT - (drewk) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:23:53 PM EST

I saw it ages ago - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:36:19 PM EST

My IQ is... - (pwhysall) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:45:13 PM EST

Give it a fake one, knob. - (admin) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:45:58 PM EST

Like I care. You suck. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:48:04 PM EST

bite me you pitiful 'neer -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:26 PM EST

In case you missed it in the initial post - (Nightowl) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:47:45 PM EST

If it's too stupid to require a real email address... - (pwhysall) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:48:58 PM EST

Ahh, failure to follow instructions - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:07 PM EST

One Hundred Percent. - (pwhysall) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:43 PM EST

The wife got 144 - "Visionary Philosopher" -NT - (Another Scott) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:46:33 PM EST

Wow, you must be quite a guy! - (CRConrad) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:04:58 PM EST

Ha! :-) She's a catch. I don't know about me.... -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:12:24 PM EST

Took it again, deliberately answered all wrong - (admin) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:51:08 PM EST

"Blind Hog" - or "Visionless Porker" -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:52:41 PM EST

seriously - (deSitter) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:00 PM EST

I assume morons can't read - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:04:16 PM EST

Also, interesting typo - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:18:28 PM EST

This is very good - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:59:44 PM EST

Java Servlet Exception - (Silverlock) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:37:36 PM EST

That means you win a prize, dunnit? -NT - (pwhysall) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:40:21 PM EST

Holy Crow! It's been IWeThey'd! -NT - (jake123) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 07:00:00 PM EST

:-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 26, 2004, 07:01:29 PM EST

culturally biased internet intelligence test (new thread) - (boxley) - Jan. 26, 2004, 08:20:58 PM EST

Story re "IQ Testing LLC" - (Ashton) - (2) - Jan. 27, 2004, 03:01:36 AM EST

Why does it seem - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 27, 2004, 05:29:06 AM EST

..Prefer a slow simmer to a tacky boil, I guess ;-) -NT - (Ashton) - Jan. 27, 2004, 04:18:24 PM EST

THEN WHO WAS PHONE?
159 ms