I saw it ages ago

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #137,959

by ben_tilly

1/26/04 5:36:19 PM

I saw it ages ago

I know that I scored in the 140s, but I don't remember by how much. I'm not bored enough to retake it.

They wanted me to pay money to get the detailed report. I declined.

Cheers,
Ben

"good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not"
- [link|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html|Stefano Mazzocchi]

Cute IQ test - (broomberg) - (95) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:47:25 PM EST

Heh - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:13:44 PM EST

My score - (orion) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:14:22 PM EST

It's vacuous - (deSitter) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:29:28 PM EST

Only when someone you don't like scores well - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:35:00 PM EST

Re: Only when someone you don't like scores well - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:35:59 PM EST

I got it - (orion) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:09:16 PM EST

Being a Gemini - (orion) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:09:58 PM EST

Got "document contains no data" for my trouble. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (8) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:16:01 PM EST

you mean your brain? -NT - (deSitter) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:34:21 PM EST

ROFL! - (a6l6e6x) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:38:15 PM EST

Standard problem with these tests - (broomberg) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:54:45 PM EST

Re: Standard problem with these tests - (deSitter) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:00:30 PM EST

Some cultural bias. - (admin) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:02:47 PM EST

Top high end never test well - (broomberg) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:15:21 PM EST

Survival skill = intelligence? - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:20:46 PM EST

KISS - (Ashton) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:09:31 PM EST

brain brammage - (boxley) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:23:23 PM EST

Ditto on that. - (folkert) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:24:00 PM EST

I like the pattern progression - (broomberg) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:31:21 PM EST

Re: I like the pattern progression - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:49:25 PM EST

No... - (folkert) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:51:14 PM EST

Mensa entry was 140 - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:05:19 PM EST

ObGroucho - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:07:55 PM EST

Ditto on the ditto - (bepatient) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:47 PM EST

Stupid test. - (admin) - (20) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:00:09 PM EST

Yes but - (broomberg) - (19) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:09:18 PM EST

That's why you have specific tests - (deSitter) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:12:50 PM EST

Math? - (broomberg) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:20:57 PM EST

Made my point - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:25:28 PM EST

car problem - (Steve Lowe) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:28:45 PM EST

I knew the name - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:36:47 PM EST

Uhh... Yeah! - (folkert) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:37:47 PM EST

Yers is prettier, mine is wordier :) -NT - (Steve Lowe) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:33 PM EST

Easier. - (Another Scott) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:08 PM EST

That's why you need someone to give the test. -NT - (admin) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:14:57 PM EST

Another problem with this test: - (admin) - (9) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:16:18 PM EST

Agreed - (broomberg) - (8) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:26:20 PM EST

I think the max on this one is probably fairly low. -NT - (admin) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:32:58 PM EST

Agreed - (broomberg) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:42:29 PM EST

By comparison: - (admin) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:27 PM EST

gotta be timed - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:11:39 PM EST

Couldn't possibly be timed. - (admin) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:12:59 PM EST

Re: Couldn't possibly be timed. - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:15:26 PM EST

Different weightings - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:33:39 PM EST

Agreed - Dupe - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:46:15 PM EST

133 - (Steve Lowe) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:03:57 PM EST

133 - same here, but I'm an 'Insightful Linguist' apparently - (Meerkat) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:30:41 PM EST

Good way to waste time. Addendum. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:51:47 PM EST

sqrt (-1) - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:43:54 PM EST

Feh - (cforde) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:55 PM EST

Re: Cute IQ test - (Nightowl) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:49:43 PM EST

142 - I'm a "Visionary Philosopher". Sheesh. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:06 PM EST

I can live with "your Intellectual Type is a Facts Curator". - (CRConrad) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:01 PM EST

135 means you didn't get any wrong. -NT - (FuManChu) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:16 PM EST

How is that possible? -NT - (admin) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:04:10 PM EST

It was my score, and I didn't get any wrong. :D -NT - (FuManChu) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:04:56 PM EST

Nope. Scott and Ben both beat us. -NT - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:34:55 PM EST

Got it up to 144 - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:44:04 PM EST

QED :) -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:45:42 PM EST

They got higher scores, not the same thing. -NT - (FuManChu) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:01:44 PM EST

Cosmic rays -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:05:28 PM EST

Those are GMAT questions - (tuberculosis) - (6) - Aug. 21, 2007, 12:43:43 PM EDT

What's that? - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:06:32 PM EST

*snicker* - (admin) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:07:28 PM EST

Yup, and you KNOW how big mine is - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:28:00 PM EST

100 * squares - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:35:01 PM EST

As Ben screams in the distance - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:39:11 PM EST

Perfect squares -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:35:27 PM EST

I didn't take the time to take it. So do I pass? -NT - (drewk) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:23:53 PM EST

I saw it ages ago - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:36:19 PM EST

My IQ is... - (pwhysall) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:45:13 PM EST

Give it a fake one, knob. - (admin) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:45:58 PM EST

Like I care. You suck. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:48:04 PM EST

bite me you pitiful 'neer -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:26 PM EST

In case you missed it in the initial post - (Nightowl) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:47:45 PM EST

If it's too stupid to require a real email address... - (pwhysall) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:48:58 PM EST

Ahh, failure to follow instructions - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:07 PM EST

One Hundred Percent. - (pwhysall) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:43 PM EST

The wife got 144 - "Visionary Philosopher" -NT - (Another Scott) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:46:33 PM EST

Wow, you must be quite a guy! - (CRConrad) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:04:58 PM EST

Ha! :-) She's a catch. I don't know about me.... -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:12:24 PM EST

Took it again, deliberately answered all wrong - (admin) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:51:08 PM EST

"Blind Hog" - or "Visionless Porker" -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:52:41 PM EST

seriously - (deSitter) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:00 PM EST

I assume morons can't read - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:04:16 PM EST

Also, interesting typo - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:18:28 PM EST

This is very good - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:59:44 PM EST

Java Servlet Exception - (Silverlock) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:37:36 PM EST

That means you win a prize, dunnit? -NT - (pwhysall) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:40:21 PM EST

Holy Crow! It's been IWeThey'd! -NT - (jake123) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 07:00:00 PM EST

:-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 26, 2004, 07:01:29 PM EST

culturally biased internet intelligence test (new thread) - (boxley) - Jan. 26, 2004, 08:20:58 PM EST

Story re "IQ Testing LLC" - (Ashton) - (2) - Jan. 27, 2004, 03:01:36 AM EST

Why does it seem - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 27, 2004, 05:29:06 AM EST

..Prefer a slow simmer to a tacky boil, I guess ;-) -NT - (Ashton) - Jan. 27, 2004, 04:18:24 PM EST

iwethey.org

Houston, we have positive capillary pressure.
124 ms