Re: Cute IQ test

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #137,925

by Nightowl

1/26/04 4:49:43 PM

Re: Cute IQ test

Your IQ score is 117

Your Intellectual Type is Word Warrior. This means you have exceptional verbal skills. You can easily make sense of complex issues and take an unusually creative approach to solving problems. Your strengths also make you a visionary. Even without trying you're able to come up with lots of new and creative ideas.

I know the math kept my score low. I'm just HORRID at math.

Nightowl >8#

"To become different from what we are, we must have some awareness of what we are."
Eric Hoffer

Cute IQ test - (broomberg) - (95) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:47:25 PM EST

Heh - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:13:44 PM EST

My score - (orion) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:14:22 PM EST

It's vacuous - (deSitter) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:29:28 PM EST

Only when someone you don't like scores well - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:35:00 PM EST

Re: Only when someone you don't like scores well - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:35:59 PM EST

I got it - (orion) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:09:16 PM EST

Being a Gemini - (orion) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:09:58 PM EST

Got "document contains no data" for my trouble. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (8) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:16:01 PM EST

you mean your brain? -NT - (deSitter) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:34:21 PM EST

ROFL! - (a6l6e6x) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:38:15 PM EST

Standard problem with these tests - (broomberg) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:54:45 PM EST

Re: Standard problem with these tests - (deSitter) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:00:30 PM EST

Some cultural bias. - (admin) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:02:47 PM EST

Top high end never test well - (broomberg) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:15:21 PM EST

Survival skill = intelligence? - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:20:46 PM EST

KISS - (Ashton) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:09:31 PM EST

brain brammage - (boxley) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:23:23 PM EST

Ditto on that. - (folkert) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:24:00 PM EST

I like the pattern progression - (broomberg) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:31:21 PM EST

Re: I like the pattern progression - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:49:25 PM EST

No... - (folkert) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:51:14 PM EST

Mensa entry was 140 - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:05:19 PM EST

ObGroucho - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:07:55 PM EST

Ditto on the ditto - (bepatient) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:47 PM EST

Stupid test. - (admin) - (20) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:00:09 PM EST

Yes but - (broomberg) - (19) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:09:18 PM EST

That's why you have specific tests - (deSitter) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:12:50 PM EST

Math? - (broomberg) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:20:57 PM EST

Made my point - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:25:28 PM EST

car problem - (Steve Lowe) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:28:45 PM EST

I knew the name - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:36:47 PM EST

Uhh... Yeah! - (folkert) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:37:47 PM EST

Yers is prettier, mine is wordier :) -NT - (Steve Lowe) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:33 PM EST

Easier. - (Another Scott) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:08 PM EST

That's why you need someone to give the test. -NT - (admin) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:14:57 PM EST

Another problem with this test: - (admin) - (9) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:16:18 PM EST

Agreed - (broomberg) - (8) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:26:20 PM EST

I think the max on this one is probably fairly low. -NT - (admin) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:32:58 PM EST

Agreed - (broomberg) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:42:29 PM EST

By comparison: - (admin) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:27 PM EST

gotta be timed - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:11:39 PM EST

Couldn't possibly be timed. - (admin) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:12:59 PM EST

Re: Couldn't possibly be timed. - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:15:26 PM EST

Different weightings - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:33:39 PM EST

Agreed - Dupe - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:46:15 PM EST

133 - (Steve Lowe) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:03:57 PM EST

133 - same here, but I'm an 'Insightful Linguist' apparently - (Meerkat) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:30:41 PM EST

Good way to waste time. Addendum. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:51:47 PM EST

sqrt (-1) - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:43:54 PM EST

Feh - (cforde) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:55 PM EST

Re: Cute IQ test - (Nightowl) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:49:43 PM EST

142 - I'm a "Visionary Philosopher". Sheesh. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:06 PM EST

I can live with "your Intellectual Type is a Facts Curator". - (CRConrad) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:01 PM EST

135 means you didn't get any wrong. -NT - (FuManChu) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:16 PM EST

How is that possible? -NT - (admin) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:04:10 PM EST

It was my score, and I didn't get any wrong. :D -NT - (FuManChu) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:04:56 PM EST

Nope. Scott and Ben both beat us. -NT - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:34:55 PM EST

Got it up to 144 - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:44:04 PM EST

QED :) -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:45:42 PM EST

They got higher scores, not the same thing. -NT - (FuManChu) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:01:44 PM EST

Cosmic rays -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:05:28 PM EST

Those are GMAT questions - (tuberculosis) - (6) - Aug. 21, 2007, 12:43:43 PM EDT

What's that? - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:06:32 PM EST

*snicker* - (admin) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:07:28 PM EST

Yup, and you KNOW how big mine is - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:28:00 PM EST

100 * squares - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:35:01 PM EST

As Ben screams in the distance - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:39:11 PM EST

Perfect squares -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:35:27 PM EST

I didn't take the time to take it. So do I pass? -NT - (drewk) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:23:53 PM EST

I saw it ages ago - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:36:19 PM EST

My IQ is... - (pwhysall) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:45:13 PM EST

Give it a fake one, knob. - (admin) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:45:58 PM EST

Like I care. You suck. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:48:04 PM EST

bite me you pitiful 'neer -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:26 PM EST

In case you missed it in the initial post - (Nightowl) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:47:45 PM EST

If it's too stupid to require a real email address... - (pwhysall) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:48:58 PM EST

Ahh, failure to follow instructions - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:07 PM EST

One Hundred Percent. - (pwhysall) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:43 PM EST

The wife got 144 - "Visionary Philosopher" -NT - (Another Scott) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:46:33 PM EST

Wow, you must be quite a guy! - (CRConrad) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:04:58 PM EST

Ha! :-) She's a catch. I don't know about me.... -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:12:24 PM EST

Took it again, deliberately answered all wrong - (admin) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:51:08 PM EST

"Blind Hog" - or "Visionless Porker" -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:52:41 PM EST

seriously - (deSitter) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:00 PM EST

I assume morons can't read - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:04:16 PM EST

Also, interesting typo - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:18:28 PM EST

This is very good - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:59:44 PM EST

Java Servlet Exception - (Silverlock) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:37:36 PM EST

That means you win a prize, dunnit? -NT - (pwhysall) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:40:21 PM EST

Holy Crow! It's been IWeThey'd! -NT - (jake123) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 07:00:00 PM EST

:-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 26, 2004, 07:01:29 PM EST

culturally biased internet intelligence test (new thread) - (boxley) - Jan. 26, 2004, 08:20:58 PM EST

Story re "IQ Testing LLC" - (Ashton) - (2) - Jan. 27, 2004, 03:01:36 AM EST

Why does it seem - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 27, 2004, 05:29:06 AM EST

..Prefer a slow simmer to a tacky boil, I guess ;-) -NT - (Ashton) - Jan. 27, 2004, 04:18:24 PM EST

iwethey.org

The parents are generally the last to know.
194 ms