IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / The Water Cooler Forum / Agreed - Dupe
Post #137,922
by broomberg
1/26/04 4:42:58 PM
1/26/04 4:46:15 PM
Reply
New Agreed - Dupe
Dupe

The higher you go, the finer you would have to tune a much wider variety of questions. Also, you would have to test people with the same basic experiences within the same age group.

This stuff quickly becomes invalid as the population ages. I would expect to test the top of this test (or damn close). I would expect you to do the same, along with your son. But I'd probably be hitting my max, where your gene pool would just be taking off.
Collapse Edited by broomberg Jan. 26, 2004, 04:46:15 PM EST
Agreed
The higher you go, the finer you would have to tune a much wider variety of questions. Also, you would have to test people with the same basic experiences within the same age group.

This stuff quickly becomes invalid as the population ages. I would expect to test the top of this test (or damn close). I would expect you to do the same, along with your son. But I'd probably be hitting my max, where your gene pool would just be taking off.
Collapse All History
     Cute IQ test - (broomberg) - (95) - Jan. 26, 2004, 02:47:25 PM EST
         Heh - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:13:44 PM EST
         My score - (orion) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:14:22 PM EST
             It's vacuous - (deSitter) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:29:28 PM EST
                 Only when someone you don't like scores well - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:35:00 PM EST
                     Re: Only when someone you don't like scores well - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:35:59 PM EST
                         I got it - (orion) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:09:16 PM EST
                     Being a Gemini - (orion) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:09:58 PM EST
         Got "document contains no data" for my trouble. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (8) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:16:01 PM EST
             you mean your brain? -NT - (deSitter) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:34:21 PM EST
                 ROFL! - (a6l6e6x) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:38:15 PM EST
                     Standard problem with these tests - (broomberg) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:54:45 PM EST
                         Re: Standard problem with these tests - (deSitter) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:00:30 PM EST
                             Some cultural bias. - (admin) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:02:47 PM EST
                                 Top high end never test well - (broomberg) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:15:21 PM EST
                                     Survival skill = intelligence? - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:20:46 PM EST
                                         KISS - (Ashton) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:09:31 PM EST
         brain brammage - (boxley) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:23:23 PM EST
         Ditto on that. - (folkert) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:24:00 PM EST
             I like the pattern progression - (broomberg) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:31:21 PM EST
                 Re: I like the pattern progression - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:49:25 PM EST
                     No... - (folkert) - Jan. 26, 2004, 03:51:14 PM EST
             Mensa entry was 140 - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:05:19 PM EST
                 ObGroucho - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:07:55 PM EST
             Ditto on the ditto - (bepatient) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:47 PM EST
         Stupid test. - (admin) - (20) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:00:09 PM EST
             Yes but - (broomberg) - (19) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:09:18 PM EST
                 That's why you have specific tests - (deSitter) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:12:50 PM EST
                     Math? - (broomberg) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:20:57 PM EST
                         Made my point - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:25:28 PM EST
                         car problem - (Steve Lowe) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:28:45 PM EST
                             I knew the name - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:36:47 PM EST
                             Uhh... Yeah! - (folkert) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:37:47 PM EST
                                 Yers is prettier, mine is wordier :) -NT - (Steve Lowe) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:33 PM EST
                             Easier. - (Another Scott) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:08 PM EST
                 That's why you need someone to give the test. -NT - (admin) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:14:57 PM EST
                 Another problem with this test: - (admin) - (9) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:16:18 PM EST
                     Agreed - (broomberg) - (8) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:26:20 PM EST
                         I think the max on this one is probably fairly low. -NT - (admin) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:32:58 PM EST
                             Agreed - (broomberg) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:42:29 PM EST
                                 By comparison: - (admin) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:27 PM EST
                                     gotta be timed - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:11:39 PM EST
                                         Couldn't possibly be timed. - (admin) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:12:59 PM EST
                                             Re: Couldn't possibly be timed. - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:15:26 PM EST
                                                 Different weightings - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:33:39 PM EST
                             Agreed - Dupe - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:46:15 PM EST
         133 - (Steve Lowe) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:03:57 PM EST
             133 - same here, but I'm an 'Insightful Linguist' apparently - (Meerkat) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:30:41 PM EST
         Good way to waste time. Addendum. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:51:47 PM EST
             sqrt (-1) - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:43:54 PM EST
         Feh - (cforde) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:55 PM EST
         Re: Cute IQ test - (Nightowl) - Jan. 26, 2004, 04:49:43 PM EST
         142 - I'm a "Visionary Philosopher". Sheesh. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:06 PM EST
         I can live with "your Intellectual Type is a Facts Curator". - (CRConrad) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:01 PM EST
         135 means you didn't get any wrong. -NT - (FuManChu) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:16 PM EST
             How is that possible? -NT - (admin) - (6) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:04:10 PM EST
                 It was my score, and I didn't get any wrong. :D -NT - (FuManChu) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:04:56 PM EST
                     Nope. Scott and Ben both beat us. -NT - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:34:55 PM EST
                         Got it up to 144 - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:44:04 PM EST
                             QED :) -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:45:42 PM EST
                         They got higher scores, not the same thing. -NT - (FuManChu) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:01:44 PM EST
                 Cosmic rays -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:05:28 PM EST
         Those are GMAT questions - (tuberculosis) - (6) - Aug. 21, 2007, 12:43:43 PM EDT
             What's that? - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:06:32 PM EST
             *snicker* - (admin) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:07:28 PM EST
                 Yup, and you KNOW how big mine is - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:28:00 PM EST
                     100 * squares - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:35:01 PM EST
                         As Ben screams in the distance - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:39:11 PM EST
                     Perfect squares -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:35:27 PM EST
         I didn't take the time to take it. So do I pass? -NT - (drewk) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:23:53 PM EST
         I saw it ages ago - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:36:19 PM EST
         My IQ is... - (pwhysall) - (7) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:45:13 PM EST
             Give it a fake one, knob. - (admin) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:45:58 PM EST
                 Like I care. You suck. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:48:04 PM EST
                     bite me you pitiful 'neer -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:26 PM EST
             In case you missed it in the initial post - (Nightowl) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:47:45 PM EST
                 If it's too stupid to require a real email address... - (pwhysall) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:48:58 PM EST
                     Ahh, failure to follow instructions - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:07 PM EST
                         One Hundred Percent. - (pwhysall) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:43 PM EST
         The wife got 144 - "Visionary Philosopher" -NT - (Another Scott) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:46:33 PM EST
             Wow, you must be quite a guy! - (CRConrad) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:04:58 PM EST
                 Ha! :-) She's a catch. I don't know about me.... -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:12:24 PM EST
         Took it again, deliberately answered all wrong - (admin) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:51:08 PM EST
             "Blind Hog" - or "Visionless Porker" -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:52:41 PM EST
             seriously - (deSitter) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:00 PM EST
                 I assume morons can't read - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:04:16 PM EST
                     Also, interesting typo - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:18:28 PM EST
             This is very good - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2004, 05:59:44 PM EST
         Java Servlet Exception - (Silverlock) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:37:36 PM EST
             That means you win a prize, dunnit? -NT - (pwhysall) - Jan. 26, 2004, 06:40:21 PM EST
             Holy Crow! It's been IWeThey'd! -NT - (jake123) - (1) - Jan. 26, 2004, 07:00:00 PM EST
                 :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 26, 2004, 07:01:29 PM EST
         culturally biased internet intelligence test (new thread) - (boxley) - Jan. 26, 2004, 08:20:58 PM EST
         Story re "IQ Testing LLC" - (Ashton) - (2) - Jan. 27, 2004, 03:01:36 AM EST
             Why does it seem - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 27, 2004, 05:29:06 AM EST
                 ..Prefer a slow simmer to a tacky boil, I guess ;-) -NT - (Ashton) - Jan. 27, 2004, 04:18:24 PM EST

Gill was also down on his luck. Fact was, he was barely keeping his head below water.
118 ms