(As opposed to a cunning one, I suppose...)
Anyway, I guess this is a nice way of saying 'You can remember plenty of stock phrases, but you suck at adding up' :)
Cute IQ test
- (broomberg)
- (95)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 02:47:25 PM EST
Heh
- (deSitter)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 03:13:44 PM EST
My score
- (orion)
- (5)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 03:14:22 PM EST
It's vacuous
- (deSitter)
- (4)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 03:29:28 PM EST
Only when someone you don't like scores well
- (broomberg)
- (3)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 03:35:00 PM EST
Re: Only when someone you don't like scores well
- (deSitter)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 03:35:59 PM EST
I got it
- (orion)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:09:16 PM EST
Being a Gemini
- (orion)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:09:58 PM EST
Got "document contains no data" for my trouble.
-NT
- (a6l6e6x)
- (8)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 03:16:01 PM EST
you mean your brain?
-NT
- (deSitter)
- (7)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 03:34:21 PM EST
ROFL!
- (a6l6e6x)
- (6)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 03:38:15 PM EST
Standard problem with these tests
- (broomberg)
- (5)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 03:54:45 PM EST
Re: Standard problem with these tests
- (deSitter)
- (4)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:00:30 PM EST
Some cultural bias.
- (admin)
- (3)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:02:47 PM EST
Top high end never test well
- (broomberg)
- (2)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:15:21 PM EST
Survival skill = intelligence?
- (deSitter)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:20:46 PM EST
KISS
- (Ashton)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:09:31 PM EST
brain brammage
- (boxley)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 03:23:23 PM EST
Ditto on that.
- (folkert)
- (6)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 03:24:00 PM EST
I like the pattern progression
- (broomberg)
- (2)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 03:31:21 PM EST
Re: I like the pattern progression
- (deSitter)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 03:49:25 PM EST
No...
- (folkert)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 03:51:14 PM EST
Mensa entry was 140
- (broomberg)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:05:19 PM EST
ObGroucho
- (deSitter)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:07:55 PM EST
Ditto on the ditto
- (bepatient)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:47 PM EST
Stupid test.
- (admin)
- (20)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:00:09 PM EST
Yes but
- (broomberg)
- (19)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:09:18 PM EST
That's why you have specific tests
- (deSitter)
- (7)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:12:50 PM EST
Math?
- (broomberg)
- (6)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:20:57 PM EST
Made my point
- (deSitter)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:25:28 PM EST
car problem
- (Steve Lowe)
- (4)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:28:45 PM EST
I knew the name
- (broomberg)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:36:47 PM EST
Uhh... Yeah!
- (folkert)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:37:47 PM EST
Yers is prettier, mine is wordier :)
-NT
- (Steve Lowe)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:33 PM EST
Easier.
- (Another Scott)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:08 PM EST
That's why you need someone to give the test.
-NT
- (admin)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:14:57 PM EST
Another problem with this test:
- (admin)
- (9)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:16:18 PM EST
Agreed
- (broomberg)
- (8)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:26:20 PM EST
I think the max on this one is probably fairly low.
-NT
- (admin)
- (7)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:32:58 PM EST
Agreed
- (broomberg)
- (5)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:42:29 PM EST
By comparison:
- (admin)
- (4)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:27 PM EST
gotta be timed
- (deSitter)
- (3)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:11:39 PM EST
Couldn't possibly be timed.
- (admin)
- (2)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:12:59 PM EST
Re: Couldn't possibly be timed.
- (deSitter)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:15:26 PM EST
Different weightings
- (broomberg)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:33:39 PM EST
Agreed - Dupe
- (broomberg)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:46:15 PM EST
133
- (Steve Lowe)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:03:57 PM EST
133 - same here, but I'm an 'Insightful Linguist' apparently
- (Meerkat)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:30:41 PM EST
Good way to waste time. Addendum.
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:51:47 PM EST
sqrt (-1)
- (deSitter)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:43:54 PM EST
Feh
- (cforde)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:39:55 PM EST
Re: Cute IQ test
- (Nightowl)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 04:49:43 PM EST
142 - I'm a "Visionary Philosopher". Sheesh.
-NT
- (mmoffitt)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:06 PM EST
I can live with "your Intellectual Type is a Facts Curator".
- (CRConrad)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:01 PM EST
135 means you didn't get any wrong.
-NT
- (FuManChu)
- (7)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:03:16 PM EST
How is that possible?
-NT
- (admin)
- (6)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:04:10 PM EST
It was my score, and I didn't get any wrong. :D
-NT
- (FuManChu)
- (4)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:04:56 PM EST
Nope. Scott and Ben both beat us.
-NT
- (broomberg)
- (3)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:34:55 PM EST
Got it up to 144
- (admin)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:44:04 PM EST
QED :)
-NT
- (deSitter)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:45:42 PM EST
They got higher scores, not the same thing.
-NT
- (FuManChu)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 06:01:44 PM EST
Cosmic rays
-NT
- (deSitter)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:05:28 PM EST
Those are GMAT questions
- (tuberculosis)
- (6)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 12:43:43 PM EDT
What's that?
- (deSitter)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:06:32 PM EST
*snicker*
- (admin)
- (4)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:07:28 PM EST
Yup, and you KNOW how big mine is
- (broomberg)
- (3)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:28:00 PM EST
100 * squares
- (admin)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:35:01 PM EST
As Ben screams in the distance
- (broomberg)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:39:11 PM EST
Perfect squares
-NT
- (deSitter)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:35:27 PM EST
I didn't take the time to take it. So do I pass?
-NT
- (drewk)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:23:53 PM EST
I saw it ages ago
- (ben_tilly)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:36:19 PM EST
My IQ is...
- (pwhysall)
- (7)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:45:13 PM EST
Give it a fake one, knob.
- (admin)
- (2)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:45:58 PM EST
Like I care. You suck.
- (pwhysall)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:48:04 PM EST
bite me you pitiful 'neer
-NT
- (deSitter)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:26 PM EST
In case you missed it in the initial post
- (Nightowl)
- (3)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:47:45 PM EST
If it's too stupid to require a real email address...
- (pwhysall)
- (2)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:48:58 PM EST
Ahh, failure to follow instructions
- (broomberg)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:07 PM EST
One Hundred Percent.
- (pwhysall)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:43 PM EST
The wife got 144 - "Visionary Philosopher"
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- (2)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:46:33 PM EST
Wow, you must be quite a guy!
- (CRConrad)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 06:04:58 PM EST
Ha! :-) She's a catch. I don't know about me....
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 06:12:24 PM EST
Took it again, deliberately answered all wrong
- (admin)
- (5)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:51:08 PM EST
"Blind Hog" - or "Visionless Porker"
-NT
- (deSitter)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:52:41 PM EST
seriously
- (deSitter)
- (2)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:54:00 PM EST
I assume morons can't read
- (broomberg)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 06:04:16 PM EST
Also, interesting typo
- (broomberg)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 06:18:28 PM EST
This is very good
- (broomberg)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 05:59:44 PM EST
Java Servlet Exception
- (Silverlock)
- (3)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 06:37:36 PM EST
That means you win a prize, dunnit?
-NT
- (pwhysall)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 06:40:21 PM EST
Holy Crow! It's been IWeThey'd!
-NT
- (jake123)
- (1)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 07:00:00 PM EST
:-)
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 07:01:29 PM EST
culturally biased internet intelligence test (new thread)
- (boxley)
- Jan. 26, 2004, 08:20:58 PM EST
Story re "IQ Testing LLC"
- (Ashton)
- (2)
- Jan. 27, 2004, 03:01:36 AM EST
Why does it seem
- (broomberg)
- (1)
- Jan. 27, 2004, 05:29:06 AM EST
..Prefer a slow simmer to a tacky boil, I guess ;-)
-NT
- (Ashton)
- Jan. 27, 2004, 04:18:24 PM EST