IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Self generated crisis?
Care to explain?

We've covered alot of this already.

Say what you want about Ronnie Rayguns...but our enemies were afraid when he was at the controls.Agree or disagree if you want...

And boy wouldn't Ralph Nader been great to have in charge...he would have sent Osama a care package of Corvairs.Special forces comprised of crash test dummies...and all weapons would be U/L.

we did not put the Taliban in power. We did not fund or assist Bin Laden. We opposed the same enemy at one time...and possibly through inaction allowed the Taliban to take power...but that would be a damned if you do damned if you don't argument.

So...did Uncle Sam buy these guys their airline tickets or what...inquiring minds want to know.
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Re: Self generated crisis?
"Say what you want about Ronnie Rayguns...but our enemies were afraid when he was at the controls."

Dude, your *friends* were afraid when he was at the controls...


Peter
Shill For Hire
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
New Some sources disagree...

We did not fund or assist Bin Laden.

In fact, some cite that we assisted bin Ladin specificially because of the proposed "Communistic threat" that Reagan fought against.

New Haven't seen them...
All I've seen is that there were weapons commitments made to the Afghan fighters. Most notably Stingers. These weapons did, in fact, turn the tide in the war against the USSR.

That does NOT constitute direct assistance to Bin Laden...and the CIA operatives that I've seen say that while they were running in the same circles...Bin Laden was giving more money to them than we were....and we were definitely not giving any money or support to him directly.

This is why the Taliban support him so...he was more directly involved than the US was in the war against the USSR. They owe him. But Bin Laden turned on the US when we did not leave Saudi after Desert Storm.

You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New See if I can find it but....
We were supporting some of the rebels in Afghanistan but not bin Laden or the Taliban. The Taliban was created by the Pakistanis and Saudis, unknown to us, as a way of keeping a certain amount of instability in Afghanistan to prevent a pipeline from Uzbeckistan to the coast because Uzb. has a *lot* of oil.

After the USSR was out, *the* the Taliban moved into the power vacuum
Jay O'Connor

"Going places unmapped
to do things unplanned
to people unsuspecting"
New According to the sources I read (I'm looking for them...)
We tried to train the Afgan fighters. But they were...um..difficult to work with.

So we worked with the Muslim that moved into the area (and which were easier to train).

I doubt we ever expected them to take over the country, much less attack us. These were Saudias, (according to some sources) our best allies over there bar none. Hell, we sell the Saudias some of our better defense equipment. They were fighting Communism. Why WOULDN'T we train them?

(I'm looking for my sources now though.)
New Source I was thinking of...
[link|http://msnbc.com/news/190144.asp?cp1=1| Source ]
New Still...
...it was on CNN, IIRC...an interview that touched upon these issues...with a member of the CIA team...basically said that the CIA and Osama's organizations were both interested in the same objectives...there wasn't any financial support and very little military support provided directly to his organization. It was more of a "hey, Osama...find out where these Stingers are supposed to go" than a "here's a bunch of Stingers for you to distribute" kind of assistance.

But in order to know for sure...we'll have to wait for those documents to be de-classified...and I've a feeling that may take a really long time.

You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Here's one supporting this...
From Frontline [link|http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/interviews/bearden.html|Interview with Milton Bearden].

Cheers,
Scott.
New Good one...
...cause thats the interview I saw...so it was PBS...not CNN.
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New A very long time....

But in order to know for sure...we'll have to wait for those documents to be de-classified...and I've a feeling that may take a really long time.

if ever. Probably doesn't really matter anyway.

New Not a bad plan...
And boy wouldn't Ralph Nader been great to have in charge...he would have sent Osama a care package of Corvairs.Special forces comprised of crash test dummies...and all weapons would be U/L.


Good plan...Guaranteed win for US!
jb4
(Resistance is not futile...)
     Admitting a mistake - (Fearless Freep) - (41)
         Re: Admitting a mistake - (wharris2) - (18)
             dunno - (boxley)
             Oh Sure. Sure. Keep telling yourself that. - (deSitter) - (16)
                 self-generated crisis? - (wharris2) - (15)
                     YOU IDIOT! PRAISING REAGAN??? - (deSitter) - (14)
                         Self generated crisis? - (bepatient) - (11)
                             Re: Self generated crisis? - (pwhysall)
                             Some sources disagree... - (Simon_Jester) - (8)
                                 Haven't seen them... - (bepatient) - (7)
                                     See if I can find it but.... - (Fearless Freep)
                                     According to the sources I read (I'm looking for them...) - (Simon_Jester) - (5)
                                         Source I was thinking of... - (Simon_Jester) - (4)
                                             Still... - (bepatient) - (3)
                                                 Here's one supporting this... - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                     Good one... - (bepatient)
                                                 A very long time.... - (Simon_Jester)
                             Not a bad plan... - (jb4)
                         Re: YOU IDIOT! PRAISING REAGAN??? - (wharris2)
                         ? - (JayMehaffey)
         Earnest, perhaps a tad premature. - (Ashton) - (7)
             Bush's greatest asset - (jb4) - (4)
                 Thank God - (deSitter) - (3)
                     Wilson - The president who brought Segregation to - (Another Scott) - (2)
                         Idiotic Polemics. The man wanted world gov't. - (deSitter) - (1)
                             You're pretty predictable yourself.... -NT - (Another Scott)
             Nit re: 'great skill with language' - (drewk) - (1)
                 There's a distinction. - (Ashton)
         Idiocy -NT - (deSitter)
         I'm really, really, really sick of this. - (mmoffitt) - (12)
             Umm.. He didn't end the planet...yet anyway. - (hnick) - (4)
                 Just wondering... - (jb4)
                 Sad commentary is: he's given credit for Not - (Ashton) - (2)
                     You think that credit is owed to him? - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                         Our hope lies in a Fact: - (Ashton)
             And what the fuck do/did you expect him to do? - (wharris2) - (6)
                 FAA especially - (Ashton) - (2)
                     STATE DEPARTMENT - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                         Re: STATE DEPARTMENT - (wharris2)
                 My point. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                     You don't win a war by bombing - (wharris2) - (1)
                         Firebombing Kabul - (kmself)

Well, from then on, we had a whale of a time. I took her to dinner, I took her to dance. I bought her a bouquet of flounders. And then I went home with her. And what did I get for my trouble? A case of the clams.
76 ms