(new) Databases

Diff between "normalization" and "factoring"? - (tablizer) - (2) - May 13, 2002, 02:51:42 PM EDT

Diff between Data Structures and Program Structures? - (ChrisR) - (1) - May 14, 2002, 12:14:37 AM EDT

Well you *could*, I guess - but only if... - (CRConrad) - May 14, 2002, 09:00:27 AM EDT

Column Selects - (tablizer) - (2) - April 30, 2002, 01:58:25 PM EDT

thats just a nested query? standard I would expect -NT - (boxley) - April 30, 2002, 02:16:59 PM EDT

Fairly standard - (ChrisR) - April 30, 2002, 03:10:51 PM EDT

really stupid oracle question - (boxley) - (11) - March 18, 2002, 02:22:59 PM EST

Ask a stupid question. . . - (morganek) - (10) - March 18, 2002, 02:48:08 PM EST

here is what we are up to - (boxley) - (9) - March 18, 2002, 03:02:54 PM EST

Re: here is what we are up to - (morganek) - (2) - March 18, 2002, 03:30:46 PM EST

looked at it, very interesting - (boxley) - (1) - March 18, 2002, 03:48:14 PM EST

FastCGI - (morganek) - March 18, 2002, 07:09:30 PM EST

Umm...that sounds like a task for a scripting language - (ben_tilly) - (5) - March 18, 2002, 05:59:36 PM EST

The application is already built - (boxley) - (4) - March 19, 2002, 09:36:39 AM EST

Take a look at Inline - (ben_tilly) - (3) - March 19, 2002, 10:57:41 AM EST

Overruled - (boxley) - (2) - March 19, 2002, 11:32:26 AM EST

In that case... - (ben_tilly) - (1) - March 19, 2002, 12:12:40 PM EST

Sent the inline link to the softwarecoder, he got excited) -NT - (boxley) - March 19, 2002, 02:18:33 PM EST

Oracle LIKE oddity - (tablizer) - (5) - March 6, 2002, 09:13:29 PM EST

the problem is you are asking to match a 4char - (boxley) - (2) - March 7, 2002, 11:14:27 AM EST

Not if... - (Yendor) - (1) - March 7, 2002, 12:01:33 PM EST

never new that, thanx :) -NT - (boxley) - March 7, 2002, 12:05:32 PM EST

works here - (SpiceWare) - March 12, 2002, 06:12:15 PM EST

Version issue - (tablizer) - April 2, 2002, 05:11:38 PM EST

Limiting Oracle Return Rows? - (tablizer) - (13) - Feb. 21, 2002, 02:15:57 PM EST

ROWNUM pseudo-column - (morganek) - (12) - Feb. 24, 2002, 01:01:30 PM EST

Sheesh, man, you still alive? - (CRConrad) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2002, 12:50:05 PM EST

Re: Sheesh, man, you still alive? - (morganek) - Feb. 25, 2002, 01:45:18 PM EST

Thanks! -NT - (tablizer) - Feb. 26, 2002, 08:56:23 PM EST

Caution - (dshellman) - (8) - Feb. 27, 2002, 12:17:38 PM EST

doesn't work here - (SpiceWare) - (7) - March 12, 2002, 06:03:55 PM EST

Re: doesn't work here - (dshellman) - (3) - March 13, 2002, 05:13:09 PM EST

Version 7.3.4.0.0 - (SpiceWare) - (2) - March 14, 2002, 02:10:39 PM EST

Re: Version 7.3.4.0.0 - (dshellman) - (1) - March 14, 2002, 04:52:41 PM EST

Wouldn't surprise me - (SpiceWare) - March 14, 2002, 05:52:59 PM EST

Alternatively, on Oracle 7, try "...where (1=1)..."? HTH! -NT - (CRConrad) - (2) - March 14, 2002, 08:24:00 AM EST

no go -NT - (SpiceWare) - (1) - March 14, 2002, 02:10:22 PM EST

Sorry, shoulda jumped-in with this earlier - (morganek) - March 16, 2002, 04:31:57 PM EST

Any preferred naming conventions? - (drewk) - (19) - Feb. 19, 2002, 02:16:53 PM EST

Re: Any preferred naming conventions? - (admin) - (10) - Feb. 19, 2002, 02:33:03 PM EST

That's about what I'm trying to do - (drewk) - Feb. 19, 2002, 02:59:12 PM EST

Busting Abstraction? - (tablizer) - (8) - Feb. 21, 2002, 01:47:10 PM EST

Many times that abstraction is put into a stored procedure - (admin) - (7) - Feb. 21, 2002, 01:49:20 PM EST

But you would still have to change "ta-x" to "sp-x" -NT - (tablizer) - (6) - Feb. 21, 2002, 02:08:27 PM EST

Uh, no. - (admin) - (5) - Feb. 21, 2002, 05:21:11 PM EST

Field management? - (tablizer) - (4) - Feb. 22, 2002, 01:24:43 AM EST

Choke point - (ChrisR) - (3) - Feb. 22, 2002, 09:32:30 AM EST

you looz some flexibility that way IMO - (tablizer) - (2) - Feb. 26, 2002, 09:07:03 PM EST

Huh? - (Yendor) - (1) - Feb. 27, 2002, 10:04:16 AM EST

I don't believe you - (tablizer) - April 30, 2002, 02:08:39 PM EDT

Re: Any preferred naming conventions? - (Yendor) - (2) - Feb. 19, 2002, 03:14:15 PM EST

Extension of this idea. - (static) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2002, 04:29:59 AM EST

Foreign keys - (tablizer) - Feb. 20, 2002, 12:58:37 PM EST

Chin up, Drew, that's not so big a problem! - (CRConrad) - (2) - Feb. 19, 2002, 04:37:05 PM EST

"I work for a living" - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 19, 2002, 04:43:43 PM EST

The meat between my ears isn't completely occified... yet. -NT - (CRConrad) - Feb. 19, 2002, 04:49:13 PM EST

A good idea not to follow - (nking) - Feb. 21, 2002, 06:58:57 AM EST

Very simple (minded?) convention - (wharris2) - Feb. 21, 2002, 05:48:30 PM EST

Question on LEFT JOIN - (drewk) - (12) - Feb. 12, 2002, 02:46:08 PM EST

An unspecified joining query *is* a left join - (kmself) - (8) - Feb. 12, 2002, 03:03:37 PM EST

Hmm, I don't think so - (drewk) - (7) - Feb. 12, 2002, 03:10:53 PM EST

No, "JOIN [tables] ON [condition]" is Standard SQL-92 AFAIK. -NT - (CRConrad) - Feb. 12, 2002, 05:38:08 PM EST

Left Join. - (static) - (5) - Feb. 12, 2002, 10:17:34 PM EST

re: inner/outer left/right joins - (tablizer) - (4) - Feb. 20, 2002, 01:07:50 PM EST

Nope, they're really more kind'a the same thing. - (CRConrad) - (3) - Feb. 20, 2002, 01:58:16 PM EST

Anybody ever do a FULL OUTER ? - (tablizer) - Feb. 21, 2002, 01:54:34 PM EST

I like that description. - (static) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2002, 12:34:51 AM EST

You're welcome! (Both of you... ;^) -NT - (CRConrad) - Feb. 25, 2002, 12:48:00 PM EST

been a long time but wouldnt a stripped seek be faster - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 12, 2002, 03:20:15 PM EST

Gaah, just got the answer - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 12, 2002, 03:28:43 PM EST

Yup. The speed depends more on the dataset - (tseliot) - Feb. 13, 2002, 10:21:53 AM EST

Access junk. - (acagle) - (6) - Jan. 31, 2002, 12:59:45 PM EST

Note: Access not necessarily required. - (acagle) - (1) - Jan. 31, 2002, 01:09:34 PM EST

Check Freshmeat - (drewk) - Jan. 31, 2002, 01:52:27 PM EST

Check freshmeat and similar first - (tonytib) - (2) - Jan. 31, 2002, 01:47:13 PM EST

Ahhhhhhhh. . . . . - (acagle) - (1) - Jan. 31, 2002, 04:18:24 PM EST

And they're almost sinfully easy -NT - (drewk) - Jan. 31, 2002, 05:28:45 PM EST

Whew. I was worried for a moment (MS access) - (wharris2) - Jan. 31, 2002, 06:12:20 PM EST

PL/SQL dynamic variable substitution question - (admin) - (6) - Jan. 25, 2002, 09:40:02 AM EST

You are looking for pointers in PL/SQL - (broomberg) - (5) - Jan. 26, 2002, 06:59:36 PM EST

Re: You are looking for pointers in PL/SQL - (admin) - (4) - Jan. 26, 2002, 07:21:47 PM EST

Share? - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 27, 2002, 12:15:01 AM EST

Doubtful... - (admin) - (2) - Jan. 27, 2002, 10:09:05 AM EST

Where is "here"? - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 27, 2002, 04:20:41 PM EST

Re: Where is "here"? - (admin) - Jan. 27, 2002, 04:39:49 PM EST

Comment in Jobs forum about Oracle dropping their C libs? - (wharris2) - (3) - Jan. 24, 2002, 05:09:15 PM EST

I'll see what I can find out at work tomorrow. -NT - (CRConrad) - Jan. 24, 2002, 05:24:08 PM EST

Naah - at least, not according to the guy I talked to. - (CRConrad) - (1) - Jan. 25, 2002, 09:13:45 AM EST

Won't happen - (broomberg) - Jan. 26, 2002, 07:04:06 PM EST

Welcome to IWETHEY!