(new) Databases

Morituri Te RFC - (deSitter) - (1) - Aug. 7, 2002, 01:26:48 PM EDT

Re: Morituri Te RFC - (broomberg) - Aug. 7, 2002, 07:19:26 PM EDT

Oracle bug - (broomberg) - (8) - Aug. 4, 2002, 12:06:46 PM EDT

But, but, it's unbreakable! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Aug. 4, 2002, 06:07:38 PM EDT

Actually... maybe not... - (folkert) - (6) - Aug. 4, 2002, 07:19:18 PM EDT

Hrmph - (broomberg) - (4) - Aug. 4, 2002, 09:55:39 PM EDT

(Voice pitch=deep) BEAUTIFUL! do-oo-bownp-bownp (/Voice) - (folkert) - (3) - Aug. 4, 2002, 10:27:04 PM EDT

Nice try - (broomberg) - (2) - Aug. 6, 2002, 09:59:24 PM EDT

Bwahahaha... ME??? - (folkert) - (1) - Aug. 7, 2002, 08:15:38 PM EDT

ALR? - (broomberg) - Aug. 8, 2002, 12:03:58 AM EDT

Went away on the new Dell box - (broomberg) - Aug. 13, 2002, 09:55:54 PM EDT

Okay, big new problem/question. - (acagle) - (5) - July 25, 2002, 04:25:40 PM EDT

What does the database have to do? - (ben_tilly) - July 25, 2002, 08:04:51 PM EDT

MSDE with Access front end? - (altmann) - (3) - July 25, 2002, 10:06:54 PM EDT

Be careful with that. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - July 26, 2002, 07:24:59 AM EDT

Aha! Also ... - (altmann) - (1) - July 26, 2002, 07:28:00 PM EDT

Of course! It's the same Engine ;-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Sept. 15, 2002, 03:39:33 PM EDT

Access autonumber skipping. - (acagle) - (3) - July 24, 2002, 11:34:13 AM EDT

just a couple first thoughts - (tseliot) - (1) - July 24, 2002, 12:29:04 PM EDT

Re: just a couple first thoughts - (acagle) - July 24, 2002, 12:59:00 PM EDT

Transactions? - (ChrisR) - July 24, 2002, 09:16:13 PM EDT

PostgreSQL v. MySQL - (kmself) - (16) - July 11, 2002, 04:16:27 AM EDT

Number of hits may not tell all? - (ben_tilly) - July 11, 2002, 06:07:04 AM EDT

We run MySQL. - (static) - July 11, 2002, 06:47:52 AM EDT

This box has both on it - (admin) - July 11, 2002, 10:17:12 AM EDT

PostgreSQL v. MySQL - (folkert) - July 11, 2002, 12:57:19 PM EDT

Spam empire? - (broomberg) - (11) - July 12, 2002, 11:19:03 PM EDT

Livin' on the edge, eh? - (admin) - (2) - July 13, 2002, 12:00:49 AM EDT

Depends on what box - (broomberg) - (1) - July 14, 2002, 12:34:52 AM EDT

Ah... different situation - (admin) - July 15, 2002, 10:33:48 AM EDT

*Sniff SNiff SNIFF* I smell blood... - (folkert) - (7) - July 14, 2002, 10:36:28 AM EDT

Ahh, the moment you've been waiting for.. - (broomberg) - (6) - July 14, 2002, 12:10:12 PM EDT

Spam is... - (kmself) - (4) - July 14, 2002, 04:08:51 PM EDT

Yes, but - (broomberg) - (3) - July 14, 2002, 04:45:35 PM EDT

Simple: - (kmself) - (2) - July 14, 2002, 07:32:23 PM EDT

Re: Simple: - (Yendor) - (1) - July 15, 2002, 09:38:42 AM EDT

Amateur - (drewk) - July 15, 2002, 12:23:18 PM EDT

And these are the people... - (ben_tilly) - July 14, 2002, 06:04:19 PM EDT

SQL question - (Mike) - (8) - July 5, 2002, 03:38:21 PM EDT

Problem with the RAND() function... - (ChrisR) - (6) - July 5, 2002, 08:39:04 PM EDT

A couple of other solutions... - (ChrisR) - (5) - July 5, 2002, 08:56:18 PM EDT

SQL Randomness - (orion) - (3) - July 5, 2002, 11:02:21 PM EDT

Not random... - (ChrisR) - (1) - July 6, 2002, 01:07:18 PM EDT

I would like to see one that is random - (orion) - July 6, 2002, 07:07:27 PM EDT

Thanks -NT - (Mike) - July 6, 2002, 05:38:53 PM EDT

Thanks -NT - (Mike) - July 6, 2002, 05:38:02 PM EDT

Two notes. - (static) - July 8, 2002, 12:01:03 AM EDT

How do you simulate a UINION on a database without it? - (drewk) - (8) - June 21, 2002, 08:43:31 PM EDT

Re: How do you simulate a UINION on a database without it? - (kmself) - June 21, 2002, 10:36:45 PM EDT

Re: How do you simulate a UINION on a database without it? - (kmself) - June 21, 2002, 10:37:07 PM EDT

AFAIK, you are outta luck -NT - (ben_tilly) - June 21, 2002, 11:20:45 PM EDT

Easy: Switch to... - (CRConrad) - (1) - June 22, 2002, 02:00:34 PM EDT

This *does* already have it - (drewk) - June 24, 2002, 09:30:42 AM EDT

Re: How do you simulate a UINION on a database without it? - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - June 23, 2002, 01:50:50 PM EDT

Thought of that already, I'm about to try the big nested IFs -NT - (drewk) - June 24, 2002, 09:31:57 AM EDT

It is open source, add your own :-) -NT - (tablizer) - July 17, 2002, 10:13:07 PM EDT

Postgres authentication problem - (kmself) - (1) - June 9, 2002, 09:58:33 PM EDT

Re: Postgres authentication problem - (altmann) - June 10, 2002, 04:42:40 AM EDT

SQL's Replacement Rant - (tablizer) - (6) - May 16, 2002, 02:23:56 PM EDT

Maybe you would prefer... - (ChrisR) - (1) - May 16, 2002, 03:42:24 PM EDT

It *is* declarative - (tablizer) - May 16, 2002, 08:26:58 PM EDT

You can do something similar - (Steven A S) - (1) - May 16, 2002, 05:06:06 PM EDT

Views are too formal - (tablizer) - May 16, 2002, 08:30:53 PM EDT

SQL "non-sequential"? Look up the concept 'SQL Cursor'. HTH! -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - May 17, 2002, 08:13:51 AM EDT

Cursors are proprietary add-ons -NT - (tablizer) - May 17, 2002, 03:58:16 PM EDT

Something I should have known... - (Meerkat) - (5) - May 13, 2002, 10:00:30 PM EDT

Valid in older versions of T-SQL - (ChrisR) - (1) - May 14, 2002, 12:09:26 AM EDT

I should probably have twigged earlier - (Meerkat) - May 14, 2002, 12:36:03 AM EDT

I'm not sure that really makes sense. - (static) - (2) - May 15, 2002, 07:31:50 AM EDT

Yup, that (your 'unless') is it - so it *does*make sense. -NT - (CRConrad) - May 15, 2002, 10:33:02 AM EDT

That's how I've always used it - (Steven A S) - May 15, 2002, 04:10:48 PM EDT

Welcome to IWETHEY!