If you remove inheritance

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #99,728 by tablizer 5/1/03 6:00:43 PM Reply	If you remove inheritance ...then OO is little more than bloated procedural, or a 60's style navigational database built from scratch. ________________ oop.ismad.com
Post #99,734 by admin 5/1/03 6:09:46 PM Reply	I didn't say remove it. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #100,076 by tablizer 5/3/03 1:24:15 AM Reply	Perhaps "ignore" is more appropriate ________________ oop.ismad.com
Post #100,101 by admin 5/3/03 8:45:12 AM Reply	I didn't say that either. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."

Another Table-head is allowed to write - (tablizer) - (37) - April 26, 2003, 06:49:43 PM EDT

This is news how? - (static) - (34) - April 27, 2003, 03:37:04 AM EDT

Many OO-heads would rather make 200 classes -NT - (tablizer) - (33) - April 28, 2003, 02:45:57 PM EDT

Any OO-heads want to corroborate this? - (static) - (32) - April 30, 2003, 08:31:44 AM EDT

We've already had this conversation with him. - (admin) - (1) - April 30, 2003, 08:34:14 AM EDT

Yes, that's what I thought someone would say. :-) -NT - (static) - April 30, 2003, 08:59:34 AM EDT

Re: Any OO-heads want to corroborate this? - (JimWeirich) - (29) - April 30, 2003, 11:55:05 AM EDT

Bryce wants to make the methodDictionary a table. - (tuberculosis) - (14) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:08:23 AM EDT

relational model of OOP - (tablizer) - (13) - April 30, 2003, 05:08:19 PM EDT

Been there, done that, have the MI t-shirt. - (admin) - (12) - April 30, 2003, 05:32:04 PM EDT

monomorphism - (tablizer) - (11) - May 1, 2003, 05:14:35 PM EDT

Re: monomorphism - (admin) - (4) - May 1, 2003, 05:27:13 PM EDT

If you remove inheritance - (tablizer) - (3) - May 1, 2003, 06:00:43 PM EDT

I didn't say remove it. -NT - (admin) - (2) - May 1, 2003, 06:09:46 PM EDT

Perhaps "ignore" is more appropriate -NT - (tablizer) - (1) - May 3, 2003, 01:24:15 AM EDT

I didn't say that either. -NT - (admin) - May 3, 2003, 08:45:12 AM EDT

Re: monomorphism - (deSitter) - (5) - May 3, 2003, 01:32:34 AM EDT

APL is not the only way to get efficient indexing - (tablizer) - (4) - May 4, 2003, 03:08:18 AM EDT

Do you finally admit - (deSitter) - (3) - May 4, 2003, 09:14:25 AM EDT

why? - (tablizer) - (2) - May 4, 2003, 03:52:08 PM EDT

Yes you are - (deSitter) - (1) - May 5, 2003, 10:09:10 AM EDT

radix is the "bucket sort" - (tablizer) - May 5, 2003, 03:33:00 PM EDT

Delta Dawn - (tablizer) - (12) - April 30, 2003, 04:54:54 PM EDT

You can't override a third of an eval string either. -NT - (tuberculosis) - (11) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:10:20 AM EDT

Sure you can! - (admin) - (9) - April 30, 2003, 06:44:40 PM EDT

Offensive - (deSitter) - (6) - April 30, 2003, 08:29:17 PM EDT

Not to me. - (admin) - (3) - April 30, 2003, 08:35:40 PM EDT

Re: Not to me. - (deSitter) - (2) - April 30, 2003, 08:38:24 PM EDT

Again: - (admin) - April 30, 2003, 08:40:58 PM EDT

Don't know about cool - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:11:07 AM EDT

Logical reason for "the" prefix - (tablizer) - (1) - May 1, 2003, 05:32:22 PM EDT

lack of response means you agree now? -NT - (tablizer) - May 5, 2003, 04:01:58 PM EDT

You're creeping me out MAN! -NT - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:11:09 AM EDT

/me blows tea through my nose! - (jb4) - May 1, 2003, 10:30:46 AM EDT

If you don't split things into "subtypes" you don't need to -NT - (tablizer) - May 1, 2003, 05:27:57 PM EDT

I think it might get more complicated than that. - (static) - May 1, 2003, 08:29:36 AM EDT

Re: Another Table-head is allowed to write - (johnu) - (1) - April 28, 2003, 03:31:58 PM EDT

A: slower response time? - (jb4) - April 28, 2003, 06:07:38 PM EDT

It requests to the errors of the tree of the activator of the exit in tribune of the suggestions.
295 ms