IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Theory and Practice of Programming Forum / We've already had this conversation with him.
Post #99,424
by admin
Picture of admin
4/30/03 8:34:14 AM
Reply
New We've already had this conversation with him.
Control-tables, et al, are fine in their place. Bryce's "utopian" vision of everything a table, and a table for everything, however, is just as bad as a 200 messy classes design.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #99,442
by static
Picture of static
4/30/03 8:59:34 AM
Reply
New Yes, that's what I thought someone would say. :-)

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please

-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.
     Another Table-head is allowed to write - (tablizer) - (37) - April 26, 2003, 06:49:43 PM EDT
         This is news how? - (static) - (34) - April 27, 2003, 03:37:04 AM EDT
             Many OO-heads would rather make 200 classes -NT - (tablizer) - (33) - April 28, 2003, 02:45:57 PM EDT
                 Any OO-heads want to corroborate this? - (static) - (32) - April 30, 2003, 08:31:44 AM EDT
                     We've already had this conversation with him. - (admin) - (1) - April 30, 2003, 08:34:14 AM EDT
                         Yes, that's what I thought someone would say. :-) -NT - (static) - April 30, 2003, 08:59:34 AM EDT
                     Re: Any OO-heads want to corroborate this? - (JimWeirich) - (29) - April 30, 2003, 11:55:05 AM EDT
                         Bryce wants to make the methodDictionary a table. - (tuberculosis) - (14) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:08:23 AM EDT
                             relational model of OOP - (tablizer) - (13) - April 30, 2003, 05:08:19 PM EDT
                                 Been there, done that, have the MI t-shirt. - (admin) - (12) - April 30, 2003, 05:32:04 PM EDT
                                     monomorphism - (tablizer) - (11) - May 1, 2003, 05:14:35 PM EDT
                                         Re: monomorphism - (admin) - (4) - May 1, 2003, 05:27:13 PM EDT
                                             If you remove inheritance - (tablizer) - (3) - May 1, 2003, 06:00:43 PM EDT
                                                 I didn't say remove it. -NT - (admin) - (2) - May 1, 2003, 06:09:46 PM EDT
                                                     Perhaps "ignore" is more appropriate -NT - (tablizer) - (1) - May 3, 2003, 01:24:15 AM EDT
                                                         I didn't say that either. -NT - (admin) - May 3, 2003, 08:45:12 AM EDT
                                         Re: monomorphism - (deSitter) - (5) - May 3, 2003, 01:32:34 AM EDT
                                             APL is not the only way to get efficient indexing - (tablizer) - (4) - May 4, 2003, 03:08:18 AM EDT
                                                 Do you finally admit - (deSitter) - (3) - May 4, 2003, 09:14:25 AM EDT
                                                     why? - (tablizer) - (2) - May 4, 2003, 03:52:08 PM EDT
                                                         Yes you are - (deSitter) - (1) - May 5, 2003, 10:09:10 AM EDT
                                                             radix is the "bucket sort" - (tablizer) - May 5, 2003, 03:33:00 PM EDT
                         Delta Dawn - (tablizer) - (12) - April 30, 2003, 04:54:54 PM EDT
                             You can't override a third of an eval string either. -NT - (tuberculosis) - (11) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:10:20 AM EDT
                                 Sure you can! - (admin) - (9) - April 30, 2003, 06:44:40 PM EDT
                                     Offensive - (deSitter) - (6) - April 30, 2003, 08:29:17 PM EDT
                                         Not to me. - (admin) - (3) - April 30, 2003, 08:35:40 PM EDT
                                             Re: Not to me. - (deSitter) - (2) - April 30, 2003, 08:38:24 PM EDT
                                                 Again: - (admin) - April 30, 2003, 08:40:58 PM EDT
                                                 Don't know about cool - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:11:07 AM EDT
                                         Logical reason for "the" prefix - (tablizer) - (1) - May 1, 2003, 05:32:22 PM EDT
                                             lack of response means you agree now? -NT - (tablizer) - May 5, 2003, 04:01:58 PM EDT
                                     You're creeping me out MAN! -NT - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:11:09 AM EDT
                                     /me blows tea through my nose! - (jb4) - May 1, 2003, 10:30:46 AM EDT
                                 If you don't split things into "subtypes" you don't need to -NT - (tablizer) - May 1, 2003, 05:27:57 PM EDT
                         I think it might get more complicated than that. - (static) - May 1, 2003, 08:29:36 AM EDT
         Re: Another Table-head is allowed to write - (johnu) - (1) - April 28, 2003, 03:31:58 PM EDT
             A: slower response time? - (jb4) - April 28, 2003, 06:07:38 PM EDT

You're gonna look like a right plank with that thing held against your face.
60 ms