Re: Another Table-head is allowed to write

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #99,095 by johnu 4/28/03 3:31:58 PM Reply	Re: Another Table-head is allowed to write Actually, "Table oriented programming" will take over the world when Windows Longhorn is released since they are switching to database file system. So what will that mean when my OO code is stored in tables? Regards, John Urberg
Post #99,141 by jb4 4/28/03 6:07:38 PM Reply	A: slower response time? Doesn't bode well for C-pigpen (the language-surrogate of the decade)... jb4 "" We continue to live in a world where all our know-how is locked into binary files in an unknown format. If our documents are our corporate memory, Microsoft still has us all condemned to Alzheimer's." Simon Phipps, SUN Microsystems

Another Table-head is allowed to write - (tablizer) - (37) - April 26, 2003, 06:49:43 PM EDT

This is news how? - (static) - (34) - April 27, 2003, 03:37:04 AM EDT

Many OO-heads would rather make 200 classes -NT - (tablizer) - (33) - April 28, 2003, 02:45:57 PM EDT

Any OO-heads want to corroborate this? - (static) - (32) - April 30, 2003, 08:31:44 AM EDT

We've already had this conversation with him. - (admin) - (1) - April 30, 2003, 08:34:14 AM EDT

Yes, that's what I thought someone would say. :-) -NT - (static) - April 30, 2003, 08:59:34 AM EDT

Re: Any OO-heads want to corroborate this? - (JimWeirich) - (29) - April 30, 2003, 11:55:05 AM EDT

Bryce wants to make the methodDictionary a table. - (tuberculosis) - (14) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:08:23 AM EDT

relational model of OOP - (tablizer) - (13) - April 30, 2003, 05:08:19 PM EDT

Been there, done that, have the MI t-shirt. - (admin) - (12) - April 30, 2003, 05:32:04 PM EDT

monomorphism - (tablizer) - (11) - May 1, 2003, 05:14:35 PM EDT

Re: monomorphism - (admin) - (4) - May 1, 2003, 05:27:13 PM EDT

If you remove inheritance - (tablizer) - (3) - May 1, 2003, 06:00:43 PM EDT

I didn't say remove it. -NT - (admin) - (2) - May 1, 2003, 06:09:46 PM EDT

Perhaps "ignore" is more appropriate -NT - (tablizer) - (1) - May 3, 2003, 01:24:15 AM EDT

I didn't say that either. -NT - (admin) - May 3, 2003, 08:45:12 AM EDT

Re: monomorphism - (deSitter) - (5) - May 3, 2003, 01:32:34 AM EDT

APL is not the only way to get efficient indexing - (tablizer) - (4) - May 4, 2003, 03:08:18 AM EDT

Do you finally admit - (deSitter) - (3) - May 4, 2003, 09:14:25 AM EDT

why? - (tablizer) - (2) - May 4, 2003, 03:52:08 PM EDT

Yes you are - (deSitter) - (1) - May 5, 2003, 10:09:10 AM EDT

radix is the "bucket sort" - (tablizer) - May 5, 2003, 03:33:00 PM EDT

Delta Dawn - (tablizer) - (12) - April 30, 2003, 04:54:54 PM EDT

You can't override a third of an eval string either. -NT - (tuberculosis) - (11) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:10:20 AM EDT

Sure you can! - (admin) - (9) - April 30, 2003, 06:44:40 PM EDT

Offensive - (deSitter) - (6) - April 30, 2003, 08:29:17 PM EDT

Not to me. - (admin) - (3) - April 30, 2003, 08:35:40 PM EDT

Re: Not to me. - (deSitter) - (2) - April 30, 2003, 08:38:24 PM EDT

Again: - (admin) - April 30, 2003, 08:40:58 PM EDT

Don't know about cool - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:11:07 AM EDT

Logical reason for "the" prefix - (tablizer) - (1) - May 1, 2003, 05:32:22 PM EDT

lack of response means you agree now? -NT - (tablizer) - May 5, 2003, 04:01:58 PM EDT

You're creeping me out MAN! -NT - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:11:09 AM EDT

/me blows tea through my nose! - (jb4) - May 1, 2003, 10:30:46 AM EDT

If you don't split things into "subtypes" you don't need to -NT - (tablizer) - May 1, 2003, 05:27:57 PM EDT

I think it might get more complicated than that. - (static) - May 1, 2003, 08:29:36 AM EDT

Re: Another Table-head is allowed to write - (johnu) - (1) - April 28, 2003, 03:31:58 PM EDT

A: slower response time? - (jb4) - April 28, 2003, 06:07:38 PM EDT

He wasn't always this way. He used to be a genial nerd, like many of us.
161 ms