Re: monomorphism

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #100,079 by deSitter 5/3/03 1:32:34 AM Reply	Re: monomorphism This is actually interesting! By "table", you really mean "array" - and so what you want is efficient indexing. So look at APL. -drl
Post #100,206 by tablizer 5/4/03 3:08:18 AM Reply	APL is not the only way to get efficient indexing Machine efficiency is not the whole issue. Maybe check out: [link\|http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?CodeAvoidance\|http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?CodeAvoidance] ________________ oop.ismad.com
Post #100,217 by deSitter 5/4/03 9:14:25 AM Reply	Do you finally admit ..that OOP is a method - a particular cooridinate system? Then we can talk about your array-centric language, as another coordinate system. If you're so radical anyway, why don't you make something that fits naturally on a stack machine? -drl
Post #100,249 by tablizer 5/4/03 3:52:08 PM Reply	why? If you're so radical anyway I am not "radical". I get emails from people who have similar ideas all the time, and many shops I have worked at are heavy users of RDMBS. (True, they perhaps are more likely to hire/rent table-heads than average.) that OOP is a method - a particular cooridinate system....why don't you make something that fits naturally on a stack machine? Anything could probably be implemented as a stack and/or a coordinate system and/or gerbals on gears. Stanford students built a computer out of only tinkertoys. However, I am more concerned about an app developer's interface (as languages and/or tools), not compiler writing/implementing. ________________ oop.ismad.com
Post #100,334 by deSitter 5/5/03 10:09:10 AM Reply	Yes you are You're radical, because you are doing "root level" work (look up the word "radix"). You want to invoke new methods. So I ask again - do you admit that OOP is a technique, and not a theory? -drl
Post #100,380 by tablizer 5/5/03 3:33:00 PM Reply	radix is the "bucket sort" because you are doing "root level" work (look up the word "radix"). I am not implementing a sort algorithm. How the database does its lookups is hidden from the DB user. So I ask again - do you admit that OOP is a technique, and not a theory? The distinction is blurry. ________________ oop.ismad.com

Another Table-head is allowed to write - (tablizer) - (37) - April 26, 2003, 06:49:43 PM EDT

This is news how? - (static) - (34) - April 27, 2003, 03:37:04 AM EDT

Many OO-heads would rather make 200 classes -NT - (tablizer) - (33) - April 28, 2003, 02:45:57 PM EDT

Any OO-heads want to corroborate this? - (static) - (32) - April 30, 2003, 08:31:44 AM EDT

We've already had this conversation with him. - (admin) - (1) - April 30, 2003, 08:34:14 AM EDT

Yes, that's what I thought someone would say. :-) -NT - (static) - April 30, 2003, 08:59:34 AM EDT

Re: Any OO-heads want to corroborate this? - (JimWeirich) - (29) - April 30, 2003, 11:55:05 AM EDT

Bryce wants to make the methodDictionary a table. - (tuberculosis) - (14) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:08:23 AM EDT

relational model of OOP - (tablizer) - (13) - April 30, 2003, 05:08:19 PM EDT

Been there, done that, have the MI t-shirt. - (admin) - (12) - April 30, 2003, 05:32:04 PM EDT

monomorphism - (tablizer) - (11) - May 1, 2003, 05:14:35 PM EDT

Re: monomorphism - (admin) - (4) - May 1, 2003, 05:27:13 PM EDT

If you remove inheritance - (tablizer) - (3) - May 1, 2003, 06:00:43 PM EDT

I didn't say remove it. -NT - (admin) - (2) - May 1, 2003, 06:09:46 PM EDT

Perhaps "ignore" is more appropriate -NT - (tablizer) - (1) - May 3, 2003, 01:24:15 AM EDT

I didn't say that either. -NT - (admin) - May 3, 2003, 08:45:12 AM EDT

Re: monomorphism - (deSitter) - (5) - May 3, 2003, 01:32:34 AM EDT

APL is not the only way to get efficient indexing - (tablizer) - (4) - May 4, 2003, 03:08:18 AM EDT

Do you finally admit - (deSitter) - (3) - May 4, 2003, 09:14:25 AM EDT

why? - (tablizer) - (2) - May 4, 2003, 03:52:08 PM EDT

Yes you are - (deSitter) - (1) - May 5, 2003, 10:09:10 AM EDT

radix is the "bucket sort" - (tablizer) - May 5, 2003, 03:33:00 PM EDT

Delta Dawn - (tablizer) - (12) - April 30, 2003, 04:54:54 PM EDT

You can't override a third of an eval string either. -NT - (tuberculosis) - (11) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:10:20 AM EDT

Sure you can! - (admin) - (9) - April 30, 2003, 06:44:40 PM EDT

Offensive - (deSitter) - (6) - April 30, 2003, 08:29:17 PM EDT

Not to me. - (admin) - (3) - April 30, 2003, 08:35:40 PM EDT

Re: Not to me. - (deSitter) - (2) - April 30, 2003, 08:38:24 PM EDT

Again: - (admin) - April 30, 2003, 08:40:58 PM EDT

Don't know about cool - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:11:07 AM EDT

Logical reason for "the" prefix - (tablizer) - (1) - May 1, 2003, 05:32:22 PM EDT

lack of response means you agree now? -NT - (tablizer) - May 5, 2003, 04:01:58 PM EDT

You're creeping me out MAN! -NT - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:11:09 AM EDT

/me blows tea through my nose! - (jb4) - May 1, 2003, 10:30:46 AM EDT

If you don't split things into "subtypes" you don't need to -NT - (tablizer) - May 1, 2003, 05:27:57 PM EDT

I think it might get more complicated than that. - (static) - May 1, 2003, 08:29:36 AM EDT

Re: Another Table-head is allowed to write - (johnu) - (1) - April 28, 2003, 03:31:58 PM EDT

A: slower response time? - (jb4) - April 28, 2003, 06:07:38 PM EDT

This isn't beer, this is lemonade.
143 ms