Though that's a good start. The trick lies in identifying when apparantly different behaviour is in fact only different because of some related data - which can thus be abstracted away.
Wade.
Another Table-head is allowed to write
- (tablizer)
- (37)
- April 26, 2003, 06:49:43 PM EDT
This is news how?
- (static)
- (34)
- April 27, 2003, 03:37:04 AM EDT
Many OO-heads would rather make 200 classes
-NT
- (tablizer)
- (33)
- April 28, 2003, 02:45:57 PM EDT
Any OO-heads want to corroborate this?
- (static)
- (32)
- April 30, 2003, 08:31:44 AM EDT
We've already had this conversation with him.
- (admin)
- (1)
- April 30, 2003, 08:34:14 AM EDT
Yes, that's what I thought someone would say. :-)
-NT
- (static)
- April 30, 2003, 08:59:34 AM EDT
Re: Any OO-heads want to corroborate this?
- (JimWeirich)
- (29)
- April 30, 2003, 11:55:05 AM EDT
Bryce wants to make the methodDictionary a table.
- (tuberculosis)
- (14)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:08:23 AM EDT
relational model of OOP
- (tablizer)
- (13)
- April 30, 2003, 05:08:19 PM EDT
Been there, done that, have the MI t-shirt.
- (admin)
- (12)
- April 30, 2003, 05:32:04 PM EDT
monomorphism
- (tablizer)
- (11)
- May 1, 2003, 05:14:35 PM EDT
Re: monomorphism
- (admin)
- (4)
- May 1, 2003, 05:27:13 PM EDT
If you remove inheritance
- (tablizer)
- (3)
- May 1, 2003, 06:00:43 PM EDT
I didn't say remove it.
-NT
- (admin)
- (2)
- May 1, 2003, 06:09:46 PM EDT
Perhaps "ignore" is more appropriate
-NT
- (tablizer)
- (1)
- May 3, 2003, 01:24:15 AM EDT
I didn't say that either.
-NT
- (admin)
- May 3, 2003, 08:45:12 AM EDT
Re: monomorphism
- (deSitter)
- (5)
- May 3, 2003, 01:32:34 AM EDT
APL is not the only way to get efficient indexing
- (tablizer)
- (4)
- May 4, 2003, 03:08:18 AM EDT
Do you finally admit
- (deSitter)
- (3)
- May 4, 2003, 09:14:25 AM EDT
why?
- (tablizer)
- (2)
- May 4, 2003, 03:52:08 PM EDT
Yes you are
- (deSitter)
- (1)
- May 5, 2003, 10:09:10 AM EDT
radix is the "bucket sort"
- (tablizer)
- May 5, 2003, 03:33:00 PM EDT
Delta Dawn
- (tablizer)
- (12)
- April 30, 2003, 04:54:54 PM EDT
You can't override a third of an eval string either.
-NT
- (tuberculosis)
- (11)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:10:20 AM EDT
Sure you can!
- (admin)
- (9)
- April 30, 2003, 06:44:40 PM EDT
Offensive
- (deSitter)
- (6)
- April 30, 2003, 08:29:17 PM EDT
Not to me.
- (admin)
- (3)
- April 30, 2003, 08:35:40 PM EDT
Re: Not to me.
- (deSitter)
- (2)
- April 30, 2003, 08:38:24 PM EDT
Again:
- (admin)
- April 30, 2003, 08:40:58 PM EDT
Don't know about cool
- (tuberculosis)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:11:07 AM EDT
Logical reason for "the" prefix
- (tablizer)
- (1)
- May 1, 2003, 05:32:22 PM EDT
lack of response means you agree now?
-NT
- (tablizer)
- May 5, 2003, 04:01:58 PM EDT
You're creeping me out MAN!
-NT
- (tuberculosis)
- Aug. 21, 2007, 06:11:09 AM EDT
/me blows tea through my nose!
- (jb4)
- May 1, 2003, 10:30:46 AM EDT
If you don't split things into "subtypes" you don't need to
-NT
- (tablizer)
- May 1, 2003, 05:27:57 PM EDT
I think it might get more complicated than that.
- (static)
- May 1, 2003, 08:29:36 AM EDT
Re: Another Table-head is allowed to write
- (johnu)
- (1)
- April 28, 2003, 03:31:58 PM EDT
A: slower response time?
- (jb4)
- April 28, 2003, 06:07:38 PM EDT