IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Was that supposed to be a response?
laws are evil and should not be followed, no non-US company deserves to own property, citing Powell's uninformative speech based on discredited information, suspicion == fact, Iraq invaded Iran, Turkey, and Kuwait last month and I missed it, the UN passed a resolution supporting the invasion and the UN missed it, 4 countries engaged in combat > scores who would rather not see a war yet, and a threat of bodily harm (nice touch).

Stop trying to pretend that you know something about world affairs and go actually learn something instead of making stuff up on the spot when you're losing an argument.
New Re: Was that supposed to be a response?
I have you down on record making the following points:

1) Saddam should have been left alone, because certain countries would rather see the Iraqi people suffer than have their little oil deals vaporized. Never mind that the Iraqi people wanted it more than anyone else.

2) Powell did not know what he was talking about, and obviously you have a better grasp on the situation and more sources of intelligence information than he does.

3) Iraq is all friendly with all the surrounding countries, and would skip across the grassy fields holding hands and picking flowers.

4) The UN never passed a resolution supporting invasion. In spite of the actual fact: [link|http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/11/08/national/main528675.shtml|http://www.cbsnews.c.../main528675.shtml] with the following excerpt: "13. Recalls, in that context, that the council has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations;" If anything, the UN should thank the U.S. for validating and enforcing its resolution, and preventing the UN from never being taken seriously again. Remember the name "Al-Tuwaitha" please. You'll be hearing about it.

Sir, it is YOU who already lost the argument.
New Re: Was that supposed to be a response?
I have you down on record making the following points:

1) Soldiers and civilians who have died in the war have been "avenged" by the conquering of Iraq. This falsely ascribes total liability for the war to Iraq when the United States invaded Iraq without a valid casus belli.

2) The United States is not the aggressor because some Iraqis supported the war. False, as popular reception does not confer legitimacy to the decision to invade.

3) The only reason Iraq is in the Arab community is because Saddam forced them into it. False, as Iraq took Arab colours upon its founding.

4) The United States is not the aggressor because internal conditions in Iraq were bad. False, as a country's internal affairs are no reason to invade except in cased of genocide, and the last thing resembling genocide in Iraq happened in 1992.

5) The United States is not the aggressor because Iraq was not complying with UN resolutions. False, as it is the Security Concil's job to determine whether noncompliance is grounds for invasion.

6) The United States is not the aggressor because Iraq must have been developing WMD because I think there are some places where Iraq may have been devloping WMD, and evidence of Iraq having developed WMD might be discovered in the future. False, because knowledge learned in the future does not make the knowledge known in the past.

7) The United States is not the aggressor because Iraq has threatened other countries in the past. False, because the diplomatic state in the past is not the diplomatic state of today.

8) The United States is not the aggressor because Iraq is funding terrorist insurgencies in Israel. False, as Israel is not one of the United States, so the US is not threatened by such action.

9) Terrorist camps known to target the US have been found in Iraq. False, as the only camps found so far are Ansar's, which is far from Iraqi control and has not directly targeted the US yet, and the PLF's, which does not target the US.

10) It is wrong to disarm Iraq under the threat of invasion if it fails to comply. We'll never know now.

11) tangaroa is a racist who thinks of arabs as "ragheads". Thanks.

12) A country should be invaded if another country finds its internal conditions disagreeable. If this were followed, the world would be a war zone as every country has some nature that another country finds disagreeable.

13) Total Fina Elf should not run Iraq's oil business. TFI does not run Iraq's oil business, but has contracts to work several fields which it bought and paid for.

14) When the federal government says there are WMDs somewhere, that proves that WMDs are there until someone proves otherwise. Fallacy of appeal to authority.

15) Colin Powell's speech was conclusive evidence of WMD development. False, even most people who agreed with him didn't think this and that was before significant parts of it were found to have been faked or inaccurate.

16) Iraq is the aggressor because there is internal strife in Iran. False, as the events are unrelated.

17) Iraq is the aggressor because Turkey and the Kurds have been in a conflict. False, as Iraq is not causing the conflict.

18) Iraq is the aggressor because the United States deployed 200,000 troops to Kuwait. False, as this is not Iraq's will.

19) The United Nations issued a resolution explicitly calling for an invasion of Iraq. False, the US stopped begging for such a resolution when it saw it didn't have the votes.

20) Only "a few" countries did not support the invasion of Iraq. False, as the number was at least half of the security council

21) Countries which did not support the invasion of Iraq are "annoying" and, by inference, irrelevant. False, as they included over half of the security council, 3 of the 5 security council members with veto power, 4 of the 9 nuclear powers, and represented about a quarter to a third of the world's population.

22) All countries which did not support the invasion of Iraq have less-than-altruistic motives. Possible, but if they're after the oil, they could invade on their own and keep it.

23) by inference, the United States has no less-than-altruistic motives in invading Iraq. False, as evidenced by Bush handing out billion dollar contracts to his business pals without any bidding process.

24) The invasion consists of "multiple countries", which by inference is a greater number than the number of countries not supporting the invasion. In fact, there are 4 countries whose forces are seeing combat: the US, Britain, Australia, and Poland.

25) The United States is not the aggressor because a lot of people are much better off since the invasion happened. False, such benefits do not change the circumstances of the orignial decision to go to war.

26) tangaroa should not talk about international law because there are a lot of people who would kick his ass if he tried. Fallacy of appeal to numbers.

27) tangaroa says that Saddam should have been left alone. False, tangaroa says that the UN should have been allowed to disarm Iraq or call for an invasion if Iraq refused.

28) tangaroa says he gets better information than Powell gets. False, tangaroa says that Powell gave crap information to the public and the UN.

29) tangaroa says that Iraq is all friendly with all the surrounding countries, and would skip across the grassy fields holding hands and picking flowers. False, tangaroa says that Iraq wasn't a serious threat to anyone and was not preparing to invade anyone at the time it got invaded.

30) UNSCR 1441 explicitly calls for an invasion of Iraq. As anyone who goes to read that link can see, "that context" refers to the SC holding a meeting to determine what "serious consequences" means.
New Re: Was that supposed to be a response?
Amazing. You're so insecure, that you devote the time to spew out that long treatise.

You are so incredibly misled. I actually have work to do, but here's just a smattering of how wrong you are. For example, you state only 4 countries have forces in Iraq. That number was in fact 28 countries at the start of the war, and as of March 27th, 49 countries had declared public membership of the coalition forces. Some of those countries include:
Afghanistan
Albania
Angola
Australia
Azerbaijan
Bulgaria
Colombia
Costa Rica
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Georgia
Honduras
Hungary
Iceland
Italy
Japan
Kuwait
Latvia
Lithuania
Macedonia
Marshall Islands
Micronesia
Mongolia
Netherlands
Nicaragua
Palau
Panama
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Rwanda
Singapore
Slovakia
Solomon Islands
South Korea
Spain
Tonga
Turkey
Uganda
Ukraine
United Kingdom
United States
Uzbekistan

I might add that Canada recently admitted it just may have sent a few commandos who are currently in Iraq (they already have a solid presence in Afghanistan).

Hey, if this keeps you busy (and off the streets), by all means pour your heart out. Almost everyone here would take a bit of issue with many of your statements, because it doesn't help either side when the facts don't match up. We're all guilty of it at some point or another, but we don't make a thirty-point list. I've been guilty recently of *ahem* high optimism about Al-Tuwaitha. That's not nailed down yet, but I am willing to consider the possibility that it was on the up-and-up there.
New And of that impressive list of mouth-'support' -
'Support' == read, fear of reprisal$.

Germany! has provided more tangible support, including specially-trained Bio-Chem experts and >1000 troops; support by manning US bases in Germany and allowing US fly-over and basing there -- than all but the "actual four" who sent more than highly-coerced flowers. Etc.

And when you hold a plebiscite in the listed places - including *especially* the UK [since you're a numbers kinda preppy, at No-Name Institute for the Arithmetical] - tell us what % of the world's population accepts One-Cabal sponsored first-strikes. Or wait til the next strike, and watch that number swell. Might not have to wait long, either. The engine is idling.


Ashton

What, no Millikan's Pot info yet?
You and marlowe in the same secret bunker? - and the same UnListed 'Best' Academy too? Pshaw, sonny. Better get back to that ""work"" - 1+1=10 - higher math.
New Not correct about Canada
No commandos. There are troops on exchange with US forces (this is a long standing program between our two countries) who are on duty in the Gulf. We could have pulled them (the program permits this) but we chose not too. Also, we have some ships there. However, no Canadian units on the ground.

We did send a thousand troops to Afghanistan to free up one of your units for duty in Iraq as well. We hope that you guys won't bomb them this time.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New Re: Not correct about Canada
We did send a thousand troops to Afghanistan to free up one of your units for duty in Iraq as well. We hope that you guys won't bomb them this time.

We'll bomb you insolent Canucks whenever we feel like it! We shoulda nailed you Brit-lovers in 1812--just wait until El Generalissimo-for-Life Busho imposes NeoNAFTA (North American Fuck Them Anschluss) on your sorry Canadian asses: you'll be designated an enemy combatant without the dreary necessity of revoking your citizenship. You-Ess-Ai! You-Ess-Ai!

\ufffdber alles,
"Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist."
New Nice to see some Super-Patriotic Spirit there, Attila :-)
We're having some children over for supper tonight.
Care to join us?


RSVP:
breast or thigh
Bush style? (carbonized)
Ashcroft style? (sermonized)
Ari Fleisher style? (tepid)
     Let us never forget... - (inthane-chan) - (47)
         Re: Let us never forget... - (cybermace5) - (46)
             Please look for response in appropriate place. Thanks. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                 Your bill, Sir! -NT - (cybermace5)
             Re: Let us never forget... - (rcareaga) - (26)
                 Re: Let us never forget... - (cybermace5) - (24)
                     Re: Let us never forget... - (rcareaga) - (23)
                         *Sigh* - (cybermace5) - (22)
                             Third possibility. - (inthane-chan) - (10)
                                 While you're at it... - (inthane-chan) - (2)
                                     Re: While you're at it... - (cybermace5) - (1)
                                         So? - (inthane-chan)
                                 ICLRPD - (drewk) - (6)
                                     I must admit, I'm rather proud of that line... ;) -NT - (inthane-chan) - (5)
                                         Bah, supposed to have gone to "suggestions" -NT - (drewk)
                                         Re: I must admit, I'm rather proud of that line... ;) - (cybermace5) - (3)
                                             Never saw it. What was it? -NT - (inthane-chan) - (2)
                                                 Re: Never saw it. What was it? - (cybermace5) - (1)
                                                     Yeah, that was pretty good. -NT - (inthane-chan)
                             Re: *Sigh* - (rcareaga) - (10)
                                 Re: *Sigh* - (cybermace5) - (9)
                                     impervious - (rcareaga) - (8)
                                         Re: impervious - (cybermace5) - (7)
                                             Your words & sentiments are sobering. Thanks it helps. - (dmarker) - (6)
                                                 Re: Your words & sentiments are sobering. Thanks it helps. - (cybermace5) - (5)
                                                     Mit der Dummheit Kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens - (rcareaga) - (4)
                                                         Re: Mit der Dummheit Kampfen Gotter selbst vergebens - (cybermace5) - (2)
                                                             you cant tell the difference between German and American? - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                 Re: you cant tell the difference between German and American - (cybermace5)
                                                         Nicht zutreffend - die G\ufffdtter "\ufffdberlassen ihr Himmel" -NT - (Ashton)
                 Not sure about "avenged", but - (Arkadiy)
             Doesn't appear so - (tangaroa) - (16)
                 Re: Doesn't appear so - (cybermace5) - (15)
                     Nice way of changing the subject - (tangaroa) - (14)
                         Re: Nice way of changing the subject - (cybermace5) - (13)
                             Re: Nice way of changing the subject - (tangaroa) - (12)
                                 Re: Nice way of changing the subject - (cybermace5) - (8)
                                     Was that supposed to be a response? - (tangaroa) - (7)
                                         Re: Was that supposed to be a response? - (cybermace5) - (6)
                                             Re: Was that supposed to be a response? - (tangaroa) - (5)
                                                 Re: Was that supposed to be a response? - (cybermace5) - (4)
                                                     And of that impressive list of mouth-'support' - - (Ashton)
                                                     Not correct about Canada - (jake123) - (2)
                                                         Re: Not correct about Canada - (rcareaga) - (1)
                                                             Nice to see some Super-Patriotic Spirit there, Attila :-) - (Ashton)
                                 You're wrong on a few things. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                     Nice. -NT - (cybermace5)
                                     Thanks - (tangaroa)

You can't take something off the Internet. It's like taking pee out of a swimming pool.
84 ms