Trade secrets, copyrights: vague claims

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #86,896

by kmself

3/9/03 1:59:16 PM

Trade secrets, copyrights: vague claims

Trade secrets certainly seem to be the bulk of the claim. However,\r\ncopyright may or may not be included. The complaint is vague\r\n(deliberately IMO) on this point.

\r\n\r\n

Note that SCO may well have abandoned it trade secrets status by\r\ndistributing the same Linux kernel code itself.

\r\n\r\n

--\r\n Karsten M. Self [link|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com|kmself@ix.netcom.com]\r\n [link|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/]\r\n What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?\r\n [link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/|TWikIWETHEY] -- an experiment in collective intelligence. Stupidity. Whatever.\r\n \r\n Keep software free. Oppose the CBDTPA. Kill S.2048 dead.\r\n[link|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html]\r\n

SCO sues IBM over Linux and Unix tech - (lordbeatnik) - (28) - March 6, 2003, 08:43:00 PM EST

Piss on the everloving Santa Cr00z Operashun -NT - (deSitter) - March 6, 2003, 08:45:51 PM EST

Suicide by cop - (kmself) - (14) - March 7, 2003, 12:15:52 AM EST

OT does Microsoft still hold the Xenix patents? -NT - (boxley) - (1) - March 7, 2003, 12:23:09 AM EST

IIRC they sold them to SCO - (orion) - March 9, 2003, 01:48:03 AM EST

Or, perhaps they intend to offer IBM an easy way out . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (6) - March 7, 2003, 12:57:20 AM EST

eye bim to "own" unix hmmm -NT - (boxley) - (5) - March 7, 2003, 01:06:23 AM EST

Yeah, scarry, huh? -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - March 7, 2003, 01:31:32 AM EST

Yeah, for IBM! - (deSitter) - (2) - March 7, 2003, 07:47:42 AM EST

Porsche 356 Speedster. -NT - (CRConrad) - March 7, 2003, 08:19:21 AM EST

ICLRPD! - (boxley) - March 7, 2003, 09:01:55 AM EST

No, no, no! Software doesn't go to IBM to die... - (mmoffitt) - March 7, 2003, 04:21:59 PM EST

Just going through the complaint... - (folkert) - (4) - March 7, 2003, 06:39:26 PM EST

IBM doesn't think that they will lose... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - March 7, 2003, 07:05:10 PM EST

ABSOLUTE MUST READ...REFUTES SCO/CALDERA... REALLY!!!! - (folkert) - March 7, 2003, 11:00:22 PM EST

ABSOLUTE MUST READ...REFUTES SCO/CALDERA... REALLY!!!! - (folkert) - March 7, 2003, 11:00:46 PM EST

IBM is a sleeping giant - (orion) - March 9, 2003, 01:49:32 AM EST

Unix trademark, *no* patents - (kmself) - March 7, 2003, 03:15:10 AM EST

"Boeis of Boeis" - How Bester-ish... - (CRConrad) - March 7, 2003, 06:34:59 AM EST

Having read the complaint, SCO was clearly doomed - (ben_tilly) - March 8, 2003, 03:03:02 PM EST

Wait just a minute here... - (orion) - (2) - March 9, 2003, 01:45:41 AM EST

System V Unix - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - March 9, 2003, 02:32:48 AM EST

Trade secrets, copyrights: vague claims - (kmself) - March 9, 2003, 01:59:16 PM EST

IGM request: research on parties - (kmself) - (2) - March 9, 2003, 06:49:16 PM EST

hereya go - (boxley) - (1) - March 9, 2003, 09:07:21 PM EST

Danke! Anyone care to tackle the rest? -NT - (kmself) - March 9, 2003, 09:25:31 PM EST

Analysis of complaint - (kmself) - (2) - March 10, 2003, 10:44:29 AM EST

Forwarded this link... - (folkert) - (1) - March 10, 2003, 10:48:49 AM EST

Re: Forwarded this link... - (kmself) - March 10, 2003, 10:59:34 AM EST

iwethey.org

This is to prove I can paint like Titian.
53 ms