OT does Microsoft still hold the Xenix patents?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #86,342 by boxley 3/7/03 12:23:09 AM Reply	OT does Microsoft still hold the Xenix patents? will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #86,846 by orion 3/9/03 1:48:03 AM Reply	IIRC they sold them to SCO and over the years SCO has changed Xenix into SCO Unix, etc. Microsoft continued to use Xenix for its mail servers, etc for a while until they invented their own server software. Imagine what would have happened if Microsoft had kept Xenix and used it instead of MS-DOS? [link\|http://pub75.ezboard.com/bantiiwethey\| New and improved, Chicken Delvits!]

SCO sues IBM over Linux and Unix tech - (lordbeatnik) - (28) - March 6, 2003, 08:43:00 PM EST

Piss on the everloving Santa Cr00z Operashun -NT - (deSitter) - March 6, 2003, 08:45:51 PM EST

Suicide by cop - (kmself) - (14) - March 7, 2003, 12:15:52 AM EST

OT does Microsoft still hold the Xenix patents? -NT - (boxley) - (1) - March 7, 2003, 12:23:09 AM EST

IIRC they sold them to SCO - (orion) - March 9, 2003, 01:48:03 AM EST

Or, perhaps they intend to offer IBM an easy way out . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (6) - March 7, 2003, 12:57:20 AM EST

eye bim to "own" unix hmmm -NT - (boxley) - (5) - March 7, 2003, 01:06:23 AM EST

Yeah, scarry, huh? -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - March 7, 2003, 01:31:32 AM EST

Yeah, for IBM! - (deSitter) - (2) - March 7, 2003, 07:47:42 AM EST

Porsche 356 Speedster. -NT - (CRConrad) - March 7, 2003, 08:19:21 AM EST

ICLRPD! - (boxley) - March 7, 2003, 09:01:55 AM EST

No, no, no! Software doesn't go to IBM to die... - (mmoffitt) - March 7, 2003, 04:21:59 PM EST

Just going through the complaint... - (folkert) - (4) - March 7, 2003, 06:39:26 PM EST

IBM doesn't think that they will lose... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - March 7, 2003, 07:05:10 PM EST

ABSOLUTE MUST READ...REFUTES SCO/CALDERA... REALLY!!!! - (folkert) - March 7, 2003, 11:00:22 PM EST

ABSOLUTE MUST READ...REFUTES SCO/CALDERA... REALLY!!!! - (folkert) - March 7, 2003, 11:00:46 PM EST

IBM is a sleeping giant - (orion) - March 9, 2003, 01:49:32 AM EST

Unix trademark, *no* patents - (kmself) - March 7, 2003, 03:15:10 AM EST

"Boeis of Boeis" - How Bester-ish... - (CRConrad) - March 7, 2003, 06:34:59 AM EST

Having read the complaint, SCO was clearly doomed - (ben_tilly) - March 8, 2003, 03:03:02 PM EST

Wait just a minute here... - (orion) - (2) - March 9, 2003, 01:45:41 AM EST

System V Unix - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - March 9, 2003, 02:32:48 AM EST

Trade secrets, copyrights: vague claims - (kmself) - March 9, 2003, 01:59:16 PM EST

IGM request: research on parties - (kmself) - (2) - March 9, 2003, 06:49:16 PM EST

hereya go - (boxley) - (1) - March 9, 2003, 09:07:21 PM EST

Danke! Anyone care to tackle the rest? -NT - (kmself) - March 9, 2003, 09:25:31 PM EST

Analysis of complaint - (kmself) - (2) - March 10, 2003, 10:44:29 AM EST

Forwarded this link... - (folkert) - (1) - March 10, 2003, 10:48:49 AM EST

Re: Forwarded this link... - (kmself) - March 10, 2003, 10:59:34 AM EST

The meat is so under cooked it is starting to eat the salad.
155 ms