IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New not my facts pal, a quote from the link
you can check THEIR facts at your convenience.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
New So you're saying you don't agree with that?
The statement you quoted from them?

Or are you saying that you do agree with it?

Or do you lack any balls whatsoever and are just going to claim that you quoted something from someone and you have no opinion on it....

In which case, why did you bother to quote it?

I'm putting $5 on you don't have the balls.
New I got yer balls right here
-0-> -0-> I enjoyed the comment I quoted, much like I enjoy the Peta folks whining at Arafat about dynamiting donkeys because they are as a group a bunch of hypocritcal assholes who think the only thing wrong with this world is America. Mahound's boys and them are two of a kind.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
New Damn. And no one took my bet. :(
I coulda made $5.

No balls.

You couldn't even say whether you agreed with it or not.
New poor baby,
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
     Hate to do it... - (bepatient) - (42)
         Given that Churchill is compared to Bush, you - (a6l6e6x) - (11)
             Churchill was no gnat. - (marlowe) - (3)
                 That's cute. - (Brandioch) - (2)
                     Irony is wasted on the stupid. - (marlowe) - (1)
                         I will now explain "irony" to you. - (Brandioch)
             I can see you didn't read very closely. - (bepatient) - (6)
                 Re: quick rejection of ideas? - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                     A false premise based upon the quick dismissal -NT - (bepatient)
                 Re: zionist pawns and such. - (a6l6e6x) - (3)
                     If G_d didnt want the Jews to have the land back - (boxley)
                     Nice read, although one "obvious" thing eludes the author. - (mmoffitt)
                     Recursive traps are so.. so jejeune? - (Ashton)
         I like the strange bedfellows part - (boxley) - (29)
             Left schmeft - bloody labels that merely serve to ... - (dmarker) - (3)
                 lets talk about them - (boxley)
                 Yes...lets. - (bepatient) - (1)
                     Wrong: NOT "enemies of the United States" - (Ashton)
             You need to check your facts. - (Brandioch) - (24)
                 not my facts pal, a quote from the link - (boxley) - (4)
                     So you're saying you don't agree with that? - (Brandioch) - (3)
                         I got yer balls right here - (boxley) - (2)
                             Damn. And no one took my bet. :( - (Brandioch) - (1)
                                 poor baby, -NT - (boxley)
                 Hmm. - (bepatient) - (18)
                     I like this quote - (boxley)
                     Only an Econ-minor could make this leap - (Ashton) - (16)
                         Dunno what the degree was... - (bepatient) - (13)
                             Give me an "e"! -NT - (bepatient)
                             You 'read' OK; it's your logic that's rilly Econ-fluffy - (Ashton) - (11)
                                 Nothing like that. - (bepatient) - (10)
                                     Odd you should mention "machines underneath" - (Ashton) - (9)
                                         No its not. - (bepatient) - (8)
                                             Now we get to.. Suddenly it's 1950 - (Ashton) - (7)
                                                 I wonder how many... - (bepatient) - (6)
                                                     This is just delicious - (Silverlock) - (5)
                                                         And this has precisely what to do with anything? - (bepatient) - (4)
                                                             Nope. - (Silverlock) - (3)
                                                                 Ironic in what sense? - (bepatient) - (2)
                                                                     Oh, come on. - (Silverlock) - (1)
                                                                         No question. - (bepatient)
                         I can explain that. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                             you mean like this? - (boxley)

Ubersoft - Standing On The Necks Of Giants
70 ms