IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 2 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Regional/World Conflict Forum / Churchill was no gnat.
Post #82,947
by marlowe
2/20/03 1:44:25 PM
Reply
New Churchill was no gnat.
He was half American and all cowboy.
No oil for TotalFinaElf!
CHICKENHAWK! Scourge of clucking hens everywhere!
Victory is the answer. There are no alternatives.
[link|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html|http://www.angelfire...arlowe/index.html]
Post #82,949
by Brandioch
2/20/03 1:50:31 PM
Reply
New That's cute.
He's pretending that he's stupid and mis-understood who was being referenced as the giant and who was the gnat.

At least, I think he's pretending to be that stupid.
Post #82,950
by marlowe
2/20/03 1:51:34 PM
Reply
New Irony is wasted on the stupid.
What are you pretending to be?
No oil for TotalFinaElf!
CHICKENHAWK! Scourge of clucking hens everywhere!
Victory is the answer. There are no alternatives.
[link|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html|http://www.angelfire...arlowe/index.html]
Post #82,952
by Brandioch
2/20/03 2:05:48 PM
Reply
New I will now explain "irony" to you.
Irony: The use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning.

So, Churchill was identified as a "giant" and Bush as a "gnat".

You said that Churchill was not a "gnat".

Which you now claim was "irony".

Therefore, you were saying that Churchill was a "gnat"?
     Hate to do it... - (bepatient) - (42) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:51:13 AM EST
         Given that Churchill is compared to Bush, you - (a6l6e6x) - (11) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:39:56 PM EST
             Churchill was no gnat. - (marlowe) - (3) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:44:25 PM EST
                 That's cute. - (Brandioch) - (2) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:50:31 PM EST
                     Irony is wasted on the stupid. - (marlowe) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:51:34 PM EST
                         I will now explain "irony" to you. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:05:48 PM EST
             I can see you didn't read very closely. - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:54:08 PM EST
                 Re: quick rejection of ideas? - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:28:29 PM EST
                     A false premise based upon the quick dismissal -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:32:35 PM EST
                 Re: zionist pawns and such. - (a6l6e6x) - (3) - Feb. 20, 2003, 05:09:39 PM EST
                     If G_d didnt want the Jews to have the land back - (boxley) - Feb. 20, 2003, 05:12:36 PM EST
                     Nice read, although one "obvious" thing eludes the author. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 21, 2003, 01:53:14 PM EST
                     Recursive traps are so.. so jejeune? - (Ashton) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:15:30 PM EST
         I like the strange bedfellows part - (boxley) - (29) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:13:19 PM EST
             Left schmeft - bloody labels that merely serve to ... - (dmarker) - (3) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:12:11 PM EST
                 lets talk about them - (boxley) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:17:44 PM EST
                 Yes...lets. - (bepatient) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:36:41 PM EST
                     Wrong: NOT "enemies of the United States" - (Ashton) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:05:42 AM EST
             You need to check your facts. - (Brandioch) - (24) - Feb. 21, 2003, 09:54:05 AM EST
                 not my facts pal, a quote from the link - (boxley) - (4) - Feb. 21, 2003, 10:53:34 AM EST
                     So you're saying you don't agree with that? - (Brandioch) - (3) - Feb. 21, 2003, 12:55:22 PM EST
                         I got yer balls right here - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 21, 2003, 02:59:13 PM EST
                             Damn. And no one took my bet. :( - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 21, 2003, 05:29:00 PM EST
                                 poor baby, -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:13:01 PM EST
                 Hmm. - (bepatient) - (18) - Feb. 21, 2003, 06:27:04 PM EST
                     I like this quote - (boxley) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:16:42 PM EST
                     Only an Econ-minor could make this leap - (Ashton) - (16) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:50:29 PM EST
                         Dunno what the degree was... - (bepatient) - (13) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:59:12 PM EST
                             Give me an "e"! -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 22, 2003, 03:57:02 PM EST
                             You 'read' OK; it's your logic that's rilly Econ-fluffy - (Ashton) - (11) - Feb. 23, 2003, 03:52:33 AM EST
                                 Nothing like that. - (bepatient) - (10) - Feb. 23, 2003, 11:05:52 AM EST
                                     Odd you should mention "machines underneath" - (Ashton) - (9) - Feb. 24, 2003, 05:54:42 AM EST
                                         No its not. - (bepatient) - (8) - Feb. 24, 2003, 07:30:35 AM EST
                                             Now we get to.. Suddenly it's 1950 - (Ashton) - (7) - Feb. 24, 2003, 08:21:46 PM EST
                                                 I wonder how many... - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 25, 2003, 12:27:05 AM EST
                                                     This is just delicious - (Silverlock) - (5) - Feb. 25, 2003, 01:39:47 PM EST
                                                         And this has precisely what to do with anything? - (bepatient) - (4) - Feb. 25, 2003, 02:57:31 PM EST
                                                             Nope. - (Silverlock) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2003, 03:08:01 PM EST
                                                                 Ironic in what sense? - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 25, 2003, 03:23:41 PM EST
                                                                     Oh, come on. - (Silverlock) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2003, 04:06:22 PM EST
                                                                         No question. - (bepatient) - Feb. 25, 2003, 05:44:52 PM EST
                         I can explain that. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 22, 2003, 01:15:20 PM EST
                             you mean like this? - (boxley) - Feb. 22, 2003, 05:47:25 PM EST

I invite this riffraff to my house every year?
65 ms