lets talk about them

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #83,088

by boxley

2/20/03 11:17:44 PM

lets talk about them

Lets talk about people from all walks & backgrounds who have a legitimate protest.

there are those. However the organizers are hijacking these people for their own purposes claiming that Joe Schmoo who is genuinely against the war supports ALL of the positions the organisers take. I beleive that Stalin called them "useful idiots."
thanx,
bill

will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar

Hate to do it... - (bepatient) - (42) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:51:13 AM EST

Given that Churchill is compared to Bush, you - (a6l6e6x) - (11) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:39:56 PM EST

Churchill was no gnat. - (marlowe) - (3) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:44:25 PM EST

That's cute. - (Brandioch) - (2) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:50:31 PM EST

Irony is wasted on the stupid. - (marlowe) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:51:34 PM EST

I will now explain "irony" to you. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:05:48 PM EST

I can see you didn't read very closely. - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:54:08 PM EST

Re: quick rejection of ideas? - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:28:29 PM EST

A false premise based upon the quick dismissal -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:32:35 PM EST

Re: zionist pawns and such. - (a6l6e6x) - (3) - Feb. 20, 2003, 05:09:39 PM EST

If G_d didnt want the Jews to have the land back - (boxley) - Feb. 20, 2003, 05:12:36 PM EST

Nice read, although one "obvious" thing eludes the author. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 21, 2003, 01:53:14 PM EST

Recursive traps are so.. so jejeune? - (Ashton) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:15:30 PM EST

I like the strange bedfellows part - (boxley) - (29) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:13:19 PM EST

Left schmeft - bloody labels that merely serve to ... - (dmarker) - (3) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:12:11 PM EST

lets talk about them - (boxley) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:17:44 PM EST

Yes...lets. - (bepatient) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:36:41 PM EST

Wrong: NOT "enemies of the United States" - (Ashton) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:05:42 AM EST

You need to check your facts. - (Brandioch) - (24) - Feb. 21, 2003, 09:54:05 AM EST

not my facts pal, a quote from the link - (boxley) - (4) - Feb. 21, 2003, 10:53:34 AM EST

So you're saying you don't agree with that? - (Brandioch) - (3) - Feb. 21, 2003, 12:55:22 PM EST

I got yer balls right here - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 21, 2003, 02:59:13 PM EST

Damn. And no one took my bet. :( - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 21, 2003, 05:29:00 PM EST

poor baby, -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:13:01 PM EST

Hmm. - (bepatient) - (18) - Feb. 21, 2003, 06:27:04 PM EST

I like this quote - (boxley) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:16:42 PM EST

Only an Econ-minor could make this leap - (Ashton) - (16) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:50:29 PM EST

Dunno what the degree was... - (bepatient) - (13) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:59:12 PM EST

Give me an "e"! -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 22, 2003, 03:57:02 PM EST

You 'read' OK; it's your logic that's rilly Econ-fluffy - (Ashton) - (11) - Feb. 23, 2003, 03:52:33 AM EST

Nothing like that. - (bepatient) - (10) - Feb. 23, 2003, 11:05:52 AM EST

Odd you should mention "machines underneath" - (Ashton) - (9) - Feb. 24, 2003, 05:54:42 AM EST

No its not. - (bepatient) - (8) - Feb. 24, 2003, 07:30:35 AM EST

Now we get to.. Suddenly it's 1950 - (Ashton) - (7) - Feb. 24, 2003, 08:21:46 PM EST

I wonder how many... - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 25, 2003, 12:27:05 AM EST

This is just delicious - (Silverlock) - (5) - Feb. 25, 2003, 01:39:47 PM EST

And this has precisely what to do with anything? - (bepatient) - (4) - Feb. 25, 2003, 02:57:31 PM EST

Nope. - (Silverlock) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2003, 03:08:01 PM EST

Ironic in what sense? - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 25, 2003, 03:23:41 PM EST

Oh, come on. - (Silverlock) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2003, 04:06:22 PM EST

No question. - (bepatient) - Feb. 25, 2003, 05:44:52 PM EST

I can explain that. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 22, 2003, 01:15:20 PM EST

you mean like this? - (boxley) - Feb. 22, 2003, 05:47:25 PM EST

iwethey.org

Moo. It's what's for dinner.
64 ms