Not at all.

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #80,055

by static

2/7/03 6:44:29 AM

Not at all.

Smalltalk does OO right, as many people here can attest.

Hell, people successfully use OO in PHP, which is as OO as C++ (but done better). I even OO'ed something in PHP because it wasn't working any other way! I don't like objects in C++, though; too much overhead to write.

Wade.

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed

Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please

-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

Re: There is NOTHING wrong with pointers! - (admin) - (46) - Feb. 4, 2003, 01:55:10 PM EST

Re: There is NOTHING wrong with pointers! - (dshellman) - (5) - Feb. 4, 2003, 02:57:39 PM EST

Cross-platform can be nasty. - (admin) - Feb. 4, 2003, 03:38:34 PM EST

Er,...really? - (jb4) - (3) - Feb. 4, 2003, 06:47:07 PM EST

Java pointer problems - (ChrisR) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:32:06 PM EST

OT: threading - (admin) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:36:29 PM EST

Just a nit - (dshellman) - Feb. 7, 2003, 01:13:26 PM EST

Re: There is NOTHING wrong with pointers! - (deSitter) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2003, 03:20:17 PM EST

Re: There is NOTHING wrong with pointers! - (admin) - Feb. 4, 2003, 03:40:40 PM EST

I guess I don't see the problems with the compiler - (jb4) - (33) - Feb. 4, 2003, 06:40:12 PM EST

Hmmmm - seems this thread got derailed due to ... - (dmarker) - (27) - Feb. 4, 2003, 08:02:51 PM EST

Java isn't a systems language at all, IMO. - (admin) - (26) - Feb. 4, 2003, 08:14:34 PM EST

I sure wouldn't use Java for Systems work - (dmarker) - (25) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:18:47 PM EST

Which brings up the point: what IS systems work - (admin) - (24) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:33:10 PM EST

The other aspect is... - (ChrisR) - (18) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:40:25 PM EST

Stroustrup has a great quote about that: - (admin) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:47:11 PM EST

Which is why C/C++ can be easily integrated with anything - (Arkadiy) - (16) - Feb. 5, 2003, 05:12:16 AM EST

*C* is the lingua franca. - (admin) - (15) - Feb. 5, 2003, 08:42:14 AM EST

ObjectiveC++ - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 5, 2003, 02:48:48 PM EST

Welcom to my nightmare! - (jb4) - (13) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:02:27 AM EST

ABI: Application Binary Interface - (admin) - (12) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:18:32 AM EST

I used to think Direct To SOM compilers would fix this - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:27:21 AM EST

Some progress has been made. - (admin) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:41:40 AM EST

Snide remark and a question - (jb4) - (5) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:30:19 PM EST

Snide response. - (admin) - Feb. 10, 2003, 04:14:16 PM EST

Libraries - remember those? - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 04:26:03 PM EST

Exactly. - (admin) - Feb. 10, 2003, 04:28:16 PM EST

Reality check: why libraries matter: - (admin) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:19:37 PM EST

Libraries - remember those? - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:53:57 PM EST

a day late and a dollar short...but extern "C" - (Simon_Jester) - (3) - Feb. 13, 2003, 12:28:21 AM EST

For a 3rd party module? No. - (admin) - (2) - Feb. 13, 2003, 09:02:41 AM EST

If you export C++ mangled functions, you're screwed. - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Feb. 13, 2003, 11:25:16 AM EST

Or, rather: Export C++ mangled functions in a lib you sell.. - (CRConrad) - Feb. 13, 2003, 05:40:18 PM EST

Simple - (deSitter) - Feb. 4, 2003, 11:33:33 PM EST

No - (Arkadiy) - (2) - Feb. 5, 2003, 05:09:24 AM EST

But, in the hands of a good programmer, it's a sharp tool. - (admin) - (1) - Feb. 5, 2003, 08:40:45 AM EST

Like Cathie Ryan said... - (Arkadiy) - Feb. 5, 2003, 10:05:14 AM EST

Friend of a Friend - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 5, 2003, 02:21:58 PM EST

Re: I guess I don't see the problems with the compiler - (admin) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2003, 08:13:12 PM EST

OK, here's where we agree to disagree, and agree to agree... - (jb4) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:10:35 PM EST

Re: OK, here's where we agree to disagree, and agree to agre - (admin) - Feb. 10, 2003, 04:25:58 PM EST

Geronimo! - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 5, 2003, 01:55:33 PM EST

Attacking Java doesn't make C++ better - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 5, 2003, 02:38:37 PM EST

does the content of this thread indicate Bryce is right? :-) -NT - (boxley) - (3) - Feb. 5, 2003, 03:09:20 PM EST

Inasmuch as: - (admin) - Feb. 5, 2003, 03:14:05 PM EST

C++ implements OO programming - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 5, 2003, 03:23:37 PM EST

Not at all. - (static) - Feb. 7, 2003, 06:44:29 AM EST

iwethey.org

Not a wholesome trottin' race, no!
73 ms