ObjectiveC++

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #79,563

by tuberculosis

2/5/03 2:48:48 PM

ObjectiveC++

The ObjectiveC extensions have now been implemented in the gcc's c++ compiler.

Why? So you can call C++ code seamlessly from Objective C code. Its got its uses.

I think that it's extraordinarily important that we in computer science keep fun in computing. When it started out, it was an awful lot of fun. Of course, the paying customer got shafted every now and then, and after a while we began to take their complaints seriously. We began to feel as if we really were responsible for the successful, error-free perfect use of these machines. I don't think we are. I think we're responsible for stretching them, setting them off in new directions, and keeping fun in the house. I hope the field of computer science never loses its sense of fun. Above all, I hope we don't become missionaries. Don't feel as if you're Bible salesmen. The world has too many of those already. What you know about computing other people will learn. Don't feel as if the key to successful computing is only in your hands. What's in your hands, I think and hope, is intelligence: the ability to see the machine as more than when you were first led up to it, that you can make it more.

--Alan Perlis

Re: There is NOTHING wrong with pointers! - (admin) - (46) - Feb. 4, 2003, 01:55:10 PM EST

Re: There is NOTHING wrong with pointers! - (dshellman) - (5) - Feb. 4, 2003, 02:57:39 PM EST

Cross-platform can be nasty. - (admin) - Feb. 4, 2003, 03:38:34 PM EST

Er,...really? - (jb4) - (3) - Feb. 4, 2003, 06:47:07 PM EST

Java pointer problems - (ChrisR) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:32:06 PM EST

OT: threading - (admin) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:36:29 PM EST

Just a nit - (dshellman) - Feb. 7, 2003, 01:13:26 PM EST

Re: There is NOTHING wrong with pointers! - (deSitter) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2003, 03:20:17 PM EST

Re: There is NOTHING wrong with pointers! - (admin) - Feb. 4, 2003, 03:40:40 PM EST

I guess I don't see the problems with the compiler - (jb4) - (33) - Feb. 4, 2003, 06:40:12 PM EST

Hmmmm - seems this thread got derailed due to ... - (dmarker) - (27) - Feb. 4, 2003, 08:02:51 PM EST

Java isn't a systems language at all, IMO. - (admin) - (26) - Feb. 4, 2003, 08:14:34 PM EST

I sure wouldn't use Java for Systems work - (dmarker) - (25) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:18:47 PM EST

Which brings up the point: what IS systems work - (admin) - (24) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:33:10 PM EST

The other aspect is... - (ChrisR) - (18) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:40:25 PM EST

Stroustrup has a great quote about that: - (admin) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:47:11 PM EST

Which is why C/C++ can be easily integrated with anything - (Arkadiy) - (16) - Feb. 5, 2003, 05:12:16 AM EST

*C* is the lingua franca. - (admin) - (15) - Feb. 5, 2003, 08:42:14 AM EST

ObjectiveC++ - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 5, 2003, 02:48:48 PM EST

Welcom to my nightmare! - (jb4) - (13) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:02:27 AM EST

ABI: Application Binary Interface - (admin) - (12) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:18:32 AM EST

I used to think Direct To SOM compilers would fix this - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:27:21 AM EST

Some progress has been made. - (admin) - Feb. 10, 2003, 10:41:40 AM EST

Snide remark and a question - (jb4) - (5) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:30:19 PM EST

Snide response. - (admin) - Feb. 10, 2003, 04:14:16 PM EST

Libraries - remember those? - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 04:26:03 PM EST

Exactly. - (admin) - Feb. 10, 2003, 04:28:16 PM EST

Reality check: why libraries matter: - (admin) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:19:37 PM EST

Libraries - remember those? - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:53:57 PM EST

a day late and a dollar short...but extern "C" - (Simon_Jester) - (3) - Feb. 13, 2003, 12:28:21 AM EST

For a 3rd party module? No. - (admin) - (2) - Feb. 13, 2003, 09:02:41 AM EST

If you export C++ mangled functions, you're screwed. - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Feb. 13, 2003, 11:25:16 AM EST

Or, rather: Export C++ mangled functions in a lib you sell.. - (CRConrad) - Feb. 13, 2003, 05:40:18 PM EST

Simple - (deSitter) - Feb. 4, 2003, 11:33:33 PM EST

No - (Arkadiy) - (2) - Feb. 5, 2003, 05:09:24 AM EST

But, in the hands of a good programmer, it's a sharp tool. - (admin) - (1) - Feb. 5, 2003, 08:40:45 AM EST

Like Cathie Ryan said... - (Arkadiy) - Feb. 5, 2003, 10:05:14 AM EST

Friend of a Friend - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 5, 2003, 02:21:58 PM EST

Re: I guess I don't see the problems with the compiler - (admin) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2003, 08:13:12 PM EST

OK, here's where we agree to disagree, and agree to agree... - (jb4) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 03:10:35 PM EST

Re: OK, here's where we agree to disagree, and agree to agre - (admin) - Feb. 10, 2003, 04:25:58 PM EST

Geronimo! - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 5, 2003, 01:55:33 PM EST

Attacking Java doesn't make C++ better - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 5, 2003, 02:38:37 PM EST

does the content of this thread indicate Bryce is right? :-) -NT - (boxley) - (3) - Feb. 5, 2003, 03:09:20 PM EST

Inasmuch as: - (admin) - Feb. 5, 2003, 03:14:05 PM EST

C++ implements OO programming - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 5, 2003, 03:23:37 PM EST

Not at all. - (static) - Feb. 7, 2003, 06:44:29 AM EST

iwethey.org

And from the spring collection, tablizer is wearing a simple three-table combination here, which offsets the index tables beautifully, whilst still preserving the relationships.
151 ms