IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New It's in my blood, I have to
But no, you still don't understand!

You used an example of Scott.
Scott is one in a million. So
are you. So am I. The fact I
know both of you just means we
are 3 in 3 million. There are
NOT a lot left. So this means
it is LESS likely that I will
stumble across a person who can
convince me to merely trust them,
rather than prove themselves, no
matter what other languages they
know.

And based on your new example, fine,
she's a hooker. But does she have
aids? Does she swallow? Does she
have a killer pimp? Merely being a
hooker is NOT enough information to
make an informed decision on whether
to sleep with her. Price is one small
piece of the equation.
New I think you missed my reference
Perhaps I should refresh your memory...

Shaw: Madam, would you sleep with me for a million dollars?

Madam: Hmm, a million dollars, yeah, I guess I would.

Shaw: Well then, would you sleep with me for ten dollars?

Madam: Sir, what kind of woman do you take me for?

Shaw: Madam, what kind of woman you are has already been established; what remains is just to agree on a price.

My reference might have been an indicator that while I thought that my argument was fundamentally sound, you might be outraged by it. :-)

Yes, I know that Scott is exceptional. One in a million? I dunno. I happen to know an amazing number of "one in a million" people. Enough to convince me that what we think of as one in a million isn't, really. Or rather he is, but there are a thousand different talents that strike us as being one in a million, so a thousand in a million can honestly claim to be one in a million at something impressive.

Anyways were I in charge of hiring, I would be willing to put my impression of competency before specific skills. Even if I was wrong about their ability at learning that specific skill, if they manage to impress me, there is generally going to be some role where they will work out well, it is just a question of figuring out what. (Unless I am plain wrong, which hopefully I would figure out sooner rather than later.)

Cheers,
Ben
"Perl is like vice grips. You can do anything with it, and it's the wrong tool for every job."
--Unknown
Expand Edited by ben_tilly Aug. 5, 2002, 09:52:10 PM EDT
New Ahh, ye of little HR experience
It is FAR harder to fire a bad programmer
who happened to be a good liar than it
was to hire him.

Even when you figure out they are worthless,
expect to hold on to them for another 3
months, minimum.

And during that timeframe, you have to attempt
to have them do real work, which means they
will screw it up, and increase your workload.

Which will effectively TRIPLE your workload
until they are replaced.

Screw that. Test them.
New I would like to believe...
that they would not impress me as competent unless there was something good to be said for them.

Yeah, I am pretty likely wrong. But I don't know of any cases where I have failed yet.

Note that I do give interviewees coding questions. Admittedly carefully chosen so that you could answer them without understanding Perl specifically, but not ones that you can get by just having a few memorized acronyms. (For instance figure out what this code does, why it is slow, and how to fix it.)

Another type of question I like is "explain to me". I will take a basic concept that the person should know (eg for various languages I can ask about OO) and say, "Pretend that I know nothing about X. Explain X to me." I then proceed to interrupt their explanations with "stupid questions" (based on my honest guesses of where a novice might be derailed). It is amazing how quickly people for whom programming was always a black box where you just followed the template that worked get derailed on that one.

I may be foolable. But I don't think that liars in particular find me easy to bypass.

Cheers,
Ben
"Perl is like vice grips. You can do anything with it, and it's the wrong tool for every job."
--Unknown
     Unemployed programmer seeking advice... (Is that all <g>) - (rsteiner) - (62)
         Your list looks OK - (wharris2) - (2)
             Good thoughts... Thanks! - (rsteiner) - (1)
                 c and perl on solaris and linux - (boxley)
         The "in thing" now is canning programmers - (tablizer) - (9)
             IT Rust Belt - by Bob Lewis - (tablizer) - (8)
                 Key point - (broomberg)
                 Writing code is *FUN* for me... - (rsteiner) - (6)
                     Ditto here. - (inthane-chan)
                     I love coding, BUT... - (gdaustin)
                     No slider widget for $ - (tablizer) - (3)
                         Re: No slider widget for $ - (rsteiner) - (2)
                             It isn't whether you mind it more... - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                                 Heh... - (rsteiner)
         Re: Unemployed programmer seeking advice... - (admin) - (8)
             DB2 versus Oracle - (tablizer) - (1)
                 But tab - you're a shoe in! - (gdaustin)
             Where to get Oracle? - (lincoln) - (5)
                 Re: Where to get Oracle? - (admin) - (4)
                     Which is why I like Oracle - (orion) - (3)
                         unless you count time - (tablizer) - (2)
                             Overpaid DBAs? - (broomberg) - (1)
                                 One More Thing - (gdaustin)
         Not a bad list - (tuberculosis) - (2)
             nit fuel - (tablizer) - (1)
                 Yes but those people are wrong :-P -NT - (tuberculosis)
         Unsuprisingly I will suggest picking up a scripting language - (ben_tilly) - (5)
             Thanks, Ben... - (rsteiner) - (4)
                 Re: Thanks, Ben... - (broomberg) - (3)
                     Why not? - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                         Dunno - (broomberg) - (1)
                             Perhaps... - (ben_tilly)
         Teach? - (andread) - (1)
             Not for me, I'm afraid... - (rsteiner)
         Hi! - (deSitter) - (3)
             Requirements for the IT jobs - (orion)
             Hullo! - (rsteiner) - (1)
                 Boo Hoo OS/2 - (deSitter)
         My biased opinion: - (broomberg) - (16)
             Be Specific - (deSitter) - (2)
                 Re: Be Specific - (broomberg) - (1)
                     Danke -NT - (deSitter)
             Re: My biased opinion: - (rsteiner) - (3)
                 Re: My biased opinion: - (broomberg) - (2)
                     Only consider 'C' if you're interested in embedded prog. -NT - (tonytib) - (1)
                         C is still guts of lots of stuff - (wharris2)
             Don't master many, but at least be exposed to several? - (ben_tilly) - (8)
                 I wouldn't - (broomberg) - (7)
                     Query - (ben_tilly) - (6)
                         Poor example - (broomberg) - (5)
                             Haggling - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                                 It's in my blood, I have to - (broomberg) - (3)
                                     I think you missed my reference - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                         Ahh, ye of little HR experience - (broomberg) - (1)
                                             I would like to believe... - (ben_tilly)
         Try SouthWest Airlines... - (gdaustin) - (5)
             Heh. - (rsteiner) - (4)
                 You might check out the Seagate & such - (tonytib) - (1)
                     It's a thought -- I'll check it out. - (rsteiner)
                 Might try ING or Wells Fargo - (gdaustin) - (1)
                     Not really... - (rsteiner)
         This made me think of you - (broomberg) - (1)
             Heh. :-) - (rsteiner)

And she wasn't kidding, either, 'cause in came the biggest, meanest looking haddock I'd ever seen come down the pike. He was covered with mussels.
86 ms