IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New FWIW this election is not going to be about the details.
Unless it's about details that are made up by Drumpf. Any kind of policy discussion is going to involve him inventing shit whole cloth as his whims dictate.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New True, but I thought we were talking (mostly) about the primaries.
Bernie can't save us if he can't win the primaries!! ;-)

Cheers,
Scott.
New I don't think he'll win the primary
The problem with Bernie is that he loses, and then is a very shit loser.

If he contests and loses again, as is most likely, then he needs to act like a fucking adult and throw the full force of his political clout and influence behind whoever gets the nomination, without equivocation or qualification.

His participation in the primary could be a valuable influence, ensuring that the Democratic Party isn't just an echo chamber, and putting some varied policy items into the debate. But if he loses? Time to nut up and get in line.

Or he could be a massive whiny arsehole with massive whiny arsehole followers, and y'all can have another four years of Cadet Bone Spurs.
New What are you on about?
One of the many things that makes Donald Trump angry is that Bernie Sanders does not seem to hold grudges. In recent speeches, Trump has pointed to the information that has come out, through WikiLeaks’ disclosures of John Podesta’s e-mails, about the Clinton team’s attitude toward Sanders during the primaries: the slights (“doofus”), the schemes (“where would you stick the knife?”), and the eye-rolling (“socialist math”). Perhaps worst of all—at least from Trump’s point of view—was Donna Brazile’s passing along of debate questions. "Now, Bernie Sanders should be angry right? Shouldn’t he be angry?” Trump asked a crowd in Florida. He sounded a little bit puzzled—he would be so mad.

The truth is that Bernie Sanders is very, very angry—at Donald Trump. He is angry enough to have spent weeks travelling on behalf of Hillary Clinton, speaking for her in union halls and arenas, to students and activists. When he talks, he is entirely Bernie—“We are going to fight for that democracy; we are not going to become an oligarchy”—and he hints strongly that he has done some negotiating with her before getting on the stage, and will continue to do so after, as he hopes, she is elected. When praising her positions, he often says “Secretary Clinton has told me” or “Secretary Clinton has promised,” as though he knows that it might not work, with the sort of swing audiences he is dispatched to persuade (students, working-class voters), simply to declare that taking these stands is in her nature. But he knows what he wants: for her to win. “This campaign is not a personality contest,” Sanders said near the beginning of a speech in Raleigh, North Carolina, on Thursday night. “We’re not voting for high-school president. We’re voting for the most powerful leader in the entire world.” He had been introduced by Pharrell Williams, the musician, who was now sitting on the stage with Clinton herself, as if it were an actual high-school election. Statements like that serve to remind Sanders’s supporters that they don’t need to be charmed by Hillary Clinton—he is over it, and they ought to be, too. But, if personality doesn’t matter, the person does.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/amy-davidson/bernie-sanderss-hard-fight-for-hillary-clinton

Maybe don't just believe whatever Scott says about Bernie all the time. ;0)
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New That's like reading about how Corbyn campaigned for "Remain" in the Brexit referendum
Technically correct.
New The second-best kind of correct
I used to think it was the most-best kind, until I realized "He's not wrong" is more best.
--

Drew
New Well.. there's this re The Source, all along of the New(est) Demo Slate:
CNN mini-flic.

I mean, whatever Bernie's 'losses'-to-date, His Was the kernel-platform which has become: today's Big Slate driving inevitably-warring ∑-candidates. Whether or not his personal charisma/or not amidst the vox populi: his apparent prescience (not only re What-actually-Matters to many of those) but his (thus) 'masterful framing' of the listicle: COUNTS in much jelloware {I wot..}



Carrion; someties it gets into the neurons ..as it makes your fact orange.
New Aspirations are wonderful, and important.
Twitter:

Taniel Verified account @Taniel

More Taniel Retweeted Gideon Resnick

so, to be clear, Sanders wants to tackle Medicare-for-All and climate change in his first 100 days but is also hesitant to touch the filibuster?

as I said when Gillibrand & Booker made similar comments, it matters whether substantive parts of platform match the procedural ones.

Taniel added,
Gideon Resnick Verified account @GideonResnick

"I don't see it as one piece of legislation," @BernieSanders tells @chrislhayes when asked what his first legislative priority would be. Says it'll be about minimum wage, M4A, climate change in the first 100 days


7:05 PM - 21 Feb 2019


Bernie doesn't know how to actually make it happen, and he doesn't care that he doesn't know.

Cheers,
Scott.
New History Prof offers some +/-'s re Bernie-chances
"What 2020 Dems can't afford to ignore about Bernie". Of course so much can go Rong in the proximate-next
... no one's guesstimate is worth a PhD at Trump U.

Hey! a slow-drip of ketamine could let us sleep through.. ... Nah, we're all suckers for watching train-wrecks; why not planet-wrecks too?
     Hey Rand, Is it okay for me to vote for Bernie again? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (28)
         Why would you want to do that?? -NT - (Another Scott) - (27)
             His principles and policies more closely align with mine. - (mmoffitt) - (26)
                 Bernie has shown that he doesn't work well with others. - (Another Scott) - (25)
                     And yet ... - (mmoffitt) - (24)
                         What's the timeline? What are the details? - (Another Scott) - (23)
                             FWIW this election is not going to be about the details. - (malraux) - (8)
                                 True, but I thought we were talking (mostly) about the primaries. - (Another Scott) - (7)
                                     I don't think he'll win the primary - (pwhysall) - (3)
                                         What are you on about? - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                             That's like reading about how Corbyn campaigned for "Remain" in the Brexit referendum - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                                 The second-best kind of correct - (drook)
                                     Well.. there's this re The Source, all along of the New(est) Demo Slate: - (Ashton) - (2)
                                         Aspirations are wonderful, and important. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                             History Prof offers some +/-'s re Bernie-chances - (Ashton)
                             Heh. I love that. - (mmoffitt) - (12)
                                 ms clinton has a carefully filtered memory - (boxley) - (11)
                                     I remember that well. - (mmoffitt) - (10)
                                         Yeah, all the millions who have health care now are "dead from the neck up". Yeah... :-/ -NT - (Another Scott) - (9)
                                             and all of those who had decent healthcare dont with extremely high deductables at 3 times the cost -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                 Thou sayest ... truly (!) - (Ashton)
                                             Yeah, those 28 million who didn't get healthcare coverage don't count anyway. Right? - (mmoffitt) - (6)
                                                 That purity pony has been rode hard and put up wet - (drook) - (5)
                                                     Sure. Quit. That's better. Aspiration is overrated. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                                                         Who said quit? - (drook) - (3)
                                                             +1. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                             I don't assume people think the way I do. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                                                 LRPD has a wrinkle on this.. - (Ashton)
                             It's not going to be easy. - (mmoffitt)

It looks like someone transcribed a naval weather forecast while woodpeckers hammered their shift keys, then randomly indented it.
123 ms