Not important that he is another in a long series of questionable accessions in a State with a political process quite as inimical to basic principles of "democratic rule" as our own, or even how poorly he handles the Power. He is a credentialed Muslim. No Infidel could suggest that Imams, their madrassas cease teaching that Jihad is acceptable behavior on this planet. It may well be that no one can cause these to cease their incitements to the young, especially the paupers with no prospects: except tp escape from here to the fantasy-world.
The Very Idea! that: anyone alive--Not a Muslim--is an Infidel who may be assassinated (and earn praise for the act!) means that Islam is Exceptional to the rules of civilized other societies: who also outnumber and out-gun them. (No wonder the West's fears of Iran + Bomb, though we dare not say: because you will Use it). I remain mystified as to Why every literate Muslim cannot see the implications of being labeled an Infidel who may be killed and his murderer rewarded. This is not absence of empathy; it's absence of a functioning mind or conscience or both.
Finally one of Theirs has here tried to tell them the obvious; Muslims merely need to look at the collateral damage of all our wars to determine what we are capable of, and all know that we have the nukes to proceed. Ergo, personally, I don't care if al-Sisi is as rapacious as the Koch brothers, the entire US Financial tribe or all those now-wealthy U.S. 'Representatives': he has here attempted to educate the people who have created a welcoming environment for assassins. Barbarian is the universal epithet for that mind-set.
I see no way out of a permanently intransigent Islam, except what always we do. (And then we shall join them in perpitude: for a toss-up whether weather does us in before? we start with nukes and the Pakistan-supplied retaliations.) I'm convinced: that the species IS that crazy, especially when one side has all the destructive power just sitting around, waiting to justify the n $Ts it cost over the last 70 years. One more mini-Towers episode or less--is all the primer it needs.
Don't you Get that? [But will a %significant of Imams + followers Get that?]
The Very Idea! that: anyone alive--Not a Muslim--is an Infidel who may be assassinated (and earn praise for the act!) means that Islam is Exceptional to the rules of civilized other societies: who also outnumber and out-gun them. (No wonder the West's fears of Iran + Bomb, though we dare not say: because you will Use it). I remain mystified as to Why every literate Muslim cannot see the implications of being labeled an Infidel who may be killed and his murderer rewarded. This is not absence of empathy; it's absence of a functioning mind or conscience or both.
Finally one of Theirs has here tried to tell them the obvious; Muslims merely need to look at the collateral damage of all our wars to determine what we are capable of, and all know that we have the nukes to proceed. Ergo, personally, I don't care if al-Sisi is as rapacious as the Koch brothers, the entire US Financial tribe or all those now-wealthy U.S. 'Representatives': he has here attempted to educate the people who have created a welcoming environment for assassins. Barbarian is the universal epithet for that mind-set.
I see no way out of a permanently intransigent Islam, except what always we do. (And then we shall join them in perpitude: for a toss-up whether weather does us in before? we start with nukes and the Pakistan-supplied retaliations.) I'm convinced: that the species IS that crazy, especially when one side has all the destructive power just sitting around, waiting to justify the n $Ts it cost over the last 70 years. One more mini-Towers episode or less--is all the primer it needs.
Don't you Get that? [But will a %significant of Imams + followers Get that?]