IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Yeah.. Jeez IF ONLY that lying Obama crew could be replaced
with someone who helped manage the last eight years of Stewardship. The we'd know that Free-base Economics can always find a tax-cut for the Right-people that Works. Like the last ones.

Ah, for the Good Old Days:
OK maybe Brownie is free, or maybe Spiro Agnew or that other guy, wossname with the 'potatoe' thing?

The sooner we gets Back<-- to familair, stable reactionary plotting - the bett
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
-- H.L. Mencken
New Nah, what we're getting
is the crew that managed it for the 50 years prior to the last 8.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
     hows that change thingy going? - (boxley) - (20)
         They don't have web access? - (Another Scott) - (17)
             when was it posted? - (boxley) - (16)
                 Bill was released - (beepster) - (1)
                     couldnt be true, it been on the intarweb forever -NT - (boxley)
                 The point was... - (Another Scott) - (13)
                     Re: The point was... - (beepster) - (10)
                         It's nothing new. - (Another Scott) - (9)
                             Did you just say that to >me?< - (beepster) - (8)
                                 Was Obama running for the House? - (Another Scott) - (7)
                                     I see - (beepster) - (6)
                                         Wrong argument - (drook) - (5)
                                             Don't get me wrong - (beepster)
                                             my main objection is that this is not a stimulus bill - (boxley) - (3)
                                                 Then what *should* they spend on? - (drook) - (2)
                                                     nuke plants, building thereof, - (boxley) - (1)
                                                         Complex; highly debatable -- many years to any production, - (Ashton)
                     you have named sources - (boxley) - (1)
                         Disagree with that characterization. - (Another Scott)
         Yeah.. Jeez IF ONLY that lying Obama crew could be replaced - (Ashton) - (1)
             Nah, what we're getting - (beepster)

Damn! Bloody %^@&^@ anal-retentive Geo Booleishness!
47 ms