IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / you have named sources
Post #304,138
by boxley
2/13/09 8:45:58 PM
Reply
New you have named sources
obama, I will wait 5 days before signing important legislation so the public can view it
pelosi: I need to get to rome for an award, pass the damn thing now

nother: thats the way it always works, although I bitterly complained when the republicans did it I now realize that any reasonable person expects this sort of stuff and I find it unfair that beep keeps harping on it just because the democrats are doing it.

Post #304,139
by Another Scott
2/13/09 9:31:25 PM
Reply
New Disagree with that characterization.
But you knew that. ;-)

We'll see how things turn out.


In other news... http://www.huffingto...ppo_n_166875.html

"When I came back to the cloak room after coming to the agreement a week ago today," said Specter, "one of my colleagues said, 'Arlen, I'm proud of you.' My Republican colleague said, 'Arlen, I'm proud of you.' I said, 'Are you going to vote with me?' And he said, 'No, I might have a primary.' And I said, 'Well, you know very well I'm going to have a primary.'"


So much for "Country First!", huh. They couldn't vote for it because they were afraid of a primary opponent...

Cheers,
Scott.
     hows that change thingy going? - (boxley) - (20) - Feb. 13, 2009, 03:56:58 PM EST
         They don't have web access? - (Another Scott) - (17) - Feb. 13, 2009, 05:06:24 PM EST
             when was it posted? - (boxley) - (16) - Feb. 13, 2009, 05:28:38 PM EST
                 Bill was released - (beepster) - (1) - Feb. 13, 2009, 05:36:07 PM EST
                     couldnt be true, it been on the intarweb forever -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 13, 2009, 05:44:39 PM EST
                 The point was... - (Another Scott) - (13) - Feb. 13, 2009, 05:46:02 PM EST
                     Re: The point was... - (beepster) - (10) - Feb. 13, 2009, 07:38:43 PM EST
                         It's nothing new. - (Another Scott) - (9) - Feb. 13, 2009, 08:12:49 PM EST
                             Did you just say that to >me?< - (beepster) - (8) - Feb. 13, 2009, 11:38:54 PM EST
                                 Was Obama running for the House? - (Another Scott) - (7) - Feb. 14, 2009, 12:39:28 AM EST
                                     I see - (beepster) - (6) - Feb. 14, 2009, 09:47:34 AM EST
                                         Wrong argument - (drook) - (5) - Feb. 14, 2009, 10:01:01 AM EST
                                             Don't get me wrong - (beepster) - Feb. 14, 2009, 10:20:08 AM EST
                                             my main objection is that this is not a stimulus bill - (boxley) - (3) - Feb. 14, 2009, 10:32:06 AM EST
                                                 Then what *should* they spend on? - (drook) - (2) - Feb. 14, 2009, 01:00:43 PM EST
                                                     nuke plants, building thereof, - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 14, 2009, 04:10:36 PM EST
                                                         Complex; highly debatable -- many years to any production, - (Ashton) - Feb. 15, 2009, 01:19:20 AM EST
                     you have named sources - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 13, 2009, 08:45:58 PM EST
                         Disagree with that characterization. - (Another Scott) - Feb. 13, 2009, 09:31:25 PM EST
         Yeah.. Jeez IF ONLY that lying Obama crew could be replaced - (Ashton) - (1) - Feb. 14, 2009, 02:44:32 AM EST
             Nah, what we're getting - (beepster) - Feb. 14, 2009, 09:48:41 AM EST

If the people speak and the king doesn't listen, there is something wrong with the king. If the king acts precipitously and the people say nothing, something is wrong with the people.
99 ms