IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New sigh (for both anti-WP responses)
Yes, I understand that WP is far from authoritative.

But the baseline description of what homeopathy is, ie: massive diluation of ingredients is pretty well documented, no matter where you are reading it.

[link|http://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=homeopathy&btnG=Search|http://www.google.co...pathy&btnG=Search]

WP is a pretty good jumping point to get the "accepted" baseline understanding on most subjects, leaving it up to the ready to go further if the subject really interests them. I've read enough about this one over the years to not feel the need to bother.
New As a jumping off point for non-controversial subjects . . .
. . I use Wikipedia early and often, but always with the caution, "verify and verify again" - and always verify with sites that are not getting their info from Wikipedia.

Aside from deliberate slant there is a lot of sloppiness. For instance, if you believe Wikipedia and/or the many "free" sites that simply copy their stuff, yellow peas (the majority of peas grown in Canada) are actually a neurotoxic vetch.

[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
     get headaches? - (boxley) - (33)
         Here's one - - (Ashton) - (5)
             well shoving the blood flow to new areas usually works - (boxley) - (2)
                 ^RTFM^ -NT - (Ashton) - (1)
                     duh oh! -NT - (boxley)
             Another one: - (admin)
             Wife's comment: - (admin)
         Their commercials give me a headache! -NT - (a6l6e6x)
         So it's water, right? -NT - (pwhysall) - (25)
             ? no. 99.9%wax n other stuff -NT - (boxley) - (24)
                 99.9999% wax (and other meaningless stuff) - (crazy) - (23)
                     works in the case of someone alergic to most - (boxley) - (22)
                         Actually, no - (crazy) - (21)
                             Im glad the PC editors on wikipedia have nailed Homeopathy - (boxley) - (3)
                                 sigh (for both anti-WP responses) - (crazy) - (1)
                                     As a jumping off point for non-controversial subjects . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                                 Ah, otheopaths vs allopaths - (crazy)
                             Citing Wikipedia on anything the least bit controversial . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (16)
                                 Impossible to know? - (crazy) - (15)
                                     Ah! an unbiased source :) - (Andrew Grygus) - (14)
                                         I don't ask you to accept the source - (crazy) - (4)
                                             oes this work in acceptable form? - (boxley) - (2)
                                                 The answer is no. - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                                                     Echinacea found effective after all . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                                             "Where is that quote from?" you ask . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                                         No homeopathic remedy has ever passed a double-blind test. - (pwhysall) - (8)
                                             Not difficult to find articles that differ with you on that. - (Andrew Grygus)
                                             http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=28 -NT - (boxley)
                                             although when it comes to picking doctors - (boxley)
                                             Re: No homeopathic remedy has ever passed a double-blind tes - (Ashton) - (4)
                                                 oooh, medicine chest comparisons - (boxley) - (3)
                                                     Minimal - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                                                         W.T.F. ? - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                             Re: W.T.F. ? - (Andrew Grygus)

Powered by the lights of perverted science!
102 ms