Does anyone else think... - (bepatient) - (57) - Dec. 7, 2001, 02:50:38 AM EST
         (giggles) Nice change. But back to topic, - (wharris2) - (1) - Dec. 7, 2001, 03:37:13 AM EST
             When in Rome, do as the Romans do. - (nking) - Dec. 7, 2001, 08:19:21 AM EST
         Takes just one test case.. - (Ashton) - (39) - Dec. 7, 2001, 04:04:25 AM EST
             The problem is... - (jb4) - Dec. 7, 2001, 08:49:51 AM EST
             And just how... - (bepatient) - (37) - Dec. 7, 2001, 10:37:30 AM EST
                 Dunno if I can put it in teerms simple enough for Econ. - (Ashton) - (36) - Dec. 7, 2001, 06:04:46 PM EST
                     Weird - (bepatient) - Dec. 7, 2001, 07:24:27 PM EST
                     Sure...fine...whatever. - (bepatient) - (34) - Dec. 7, 2001, 07:23:41 PM EST
                         Of course she is. - (Ashton) - (27) - Dec. 7, 2001, 09:28:32 PM EST
                             Presumption - (imric) - (26) - Dec. 7, 2001, 09:45:47 PM EST
                                 comfort? utter BS. - (Ashton) - (25) - Dec. 7, 2001, 10:34:05 PM EST
                                     Get this. - (imric) - (24) - Dec. 8, 2001, 12:48:42 AM EST
                                         These are quite 'special' circumstances. - (Ashton) - (23) - Dec. 8, 2001, 06:21:30 AM EST
                                             Insolent? - (imric) - (20) - Dec. 8, 2001, 08:46:48 AM EST
                                                 Ah how EZ it would all be if.. logic alone were enough! - (Ashton) - (14) - Dec. 8, 2001, 07:37:23 PM EST
                                                     Logic alone? - (imric) - (13) - Dec. 10, 2001, 10:26:18 AM EST
                                                         Piffle - (Silverlock) - (12) - Dec. 10, 2001, 11:42:49 AM EST
                                                             *chortle* -NT - (imric) - Dec. 10, 2001, 11:50:54 AM EST
                                                             Not quite. - (bepatient) - (10) - Dec. 10, 2001, 11:58:19 AM EST
                                                                 anti-piffle - (Silverlock) - (9) - Dec. 10, 2001, 12:50:21 PM EST
                                                                     Reinstate it - BeeP (of all people) corroborated it! - (CRConrad) - (8) - Dec. 10, 2001, 05:03:20 PM EST
                                                                         Yup. - (imric) - Dec. 10, 2001, 06:01:58 PM EST
                                                                         not really... - (bepatient) - (6) - Dec. 10, 2001, 08:59:03 PM EST
                                                                             Seems it only notes that they DO; doesn't say HAVE TO. - (CRConrad) - (5) - Dec. 12, 2001, 07:36:18 AM EST
                                                                                 So you are all in favor... - (bepatient) - (4) - Dec. 12, 2001, 09:32:10 AM EST
                                                                                     Nice two step - (Silverlock) - (2) - Dec. 12, 2001, 10:01:00 AM EST
                                                                                         Upthread - (bepatient) - (1) - Dec. 12, 2001, 10:19:35 AM EST
                                                                                             Yeah. And? - (Silverlock) - Dec. 12, 2001, 10:46:24 AM EST
                                                                                     You're making Marlowe's mistake: Conflating... - (CRConrad) - Dec. 12, 2001, 10:21:23 AM EST
                                                 Hey Maggie! - (Ashton) - (4) - Dec. 8, 2001, 07:41:16 PM EST
                                                     Hey Ash! - (slugbug) - (3) - Dec. 8, 2001, 10:29:20 PM EST
                                                         Thanks. - (Ashton) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2001, 12:57:38 AM EST
                                                             not 100% - (slugbug) - (1) - Dec. 9, 2001, 01:08:21 AM EST
                                                                 Well, then, start a new topic. - (Andrew Grygus) - Dec. 9, 2001, 05:12:30 PM EST
                                             Even easier solution. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Dec. 8, 2001, 08:47:54 PM EST
                                                 "The play's the thing wherein we'll catch the conscience of - (Ashton) - Dec. 9, 2001, 12:40:47 AM EST
                         Third option: - (mhuber) - (3) - Dec. 7, 2001, 10:02:59 PM EST
                             That would be the Decent, the Honorable, the American thing - (Ashton) - (2) - Dec. 7, 2001, 10:45:11 PM EST
                                 And I suspect - (mhuber) - (1) - Dec. 9, 2001, 02:20:38 PM EST
                                     Thanks, Mike.__ Al punte, as usual. - (Ashton) - Dec. 9, 2001, 03:15:45 PM EST
                         Two thoughts comes to mind.... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Dec. 8, 2001, 11:00:44 AM EST
                             Third: What (?) do we 'Stand For' _...if anything at all (?) -NT - (Ashton) - Dec. 8, 2001, 07:44:05 PM EST
         [OT]Ad on the page... - (inthane-chan) - Dec. 7, 2001, 11:07:55 AM EST
         Fine point - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Dec. 7, 2001, 12:29:26 PM EST
             In that case - (nking) - (1) - Dec. 7, 2001, 04:22:27 PM EST
                 Yes You Can, Norm - (Ashton) - Dec. 7, 2001, 06:14:15 PM EST
         having met some AF wimmen it may give a renewal of the term - (boxley) - (6) - Dec. 7, 2001, 08:20:02 PM EST
             Maybe glamour + toughness aren't a common mix; and for sure, - (Ashton) - (5) - Dec. 7, 2001, 09:48:43 PM EST
                 Re: Maybe glamour + toughness aren't a common mix; and for s - (wharris2) - (4) - Dec. 7, 2001, 10:32:30 PM EST
                     No need for 'Duck' if that were his meaning (?) - (Ashton) - (3) - Dec. 7, 2001, 10:50:11 PM EST
                         As the Huron said to his soup, e tu Brule? - (boxley) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2001, 10:40:44 PM EST
                             Yeah well, I figure in any *real* misogynist situation, - (Ashton) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2001, 11:21:30 PM EST
                                 define "underdog" :) -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 11, 2001, 09:40:47 PM EST
         Take from the Soapbox - (bepatient) - (3) - Dec. 10, 2001, 12:02:40 PM EST
             More info - (bepatient) - Dec. 10, 2001, 12:07:29 PM EST
             It becomes more apparent that, the State Dept. presumes its - (Ashton) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2001, 11:51:05 PM EST
                 No...actually... - (bepatient) - Dec. 11, 2001, 10:13:13 AM EST