No

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #162,251 by deSitter 6/30/04 12:42:10 PM Reply	No All kids should have responsible behavior drilled into them by a world that gives a shit. This would raise the stakes of rebellion, and purify it again. -drl
Post #162,325 by Ashton 6/30/04 4:55:26 PM Reply	Sure - And for many generations, it was thought that you Could "DRILL this" via sticks and corporal punishment with some bizarre, one might say sadistic variants -- even teach math..?! via sufficient numbers of RAPS on the knuckles, of incarcerated schoolchildren. So you propose to 'teach' / DRILL [this adult] discrimination: exactly How? (There are n-million volumes on this topic, already. I'm guessing that there must be some contradictory 'methods' out there. There's also Truth by T. Pratchett, when all those fail. Too.) Oh, I've heard, that in 'farmilies' -- Good Examples are known to be pretty effective.. (That needs though, an Adult head-of-family. Doesn't it? Bummer, that.) {sheesh}
Post #162,343 by deSitter 6/30/04 7:18:56 PM Reply	Re: Sure - I think corporal punishment of unruly brats is essential. You then correct the id, not the kid. Will the little darling smart a bit with his knuckles rapped? Sure. Will he then dismember the clock or camera? Not as likely. Of course, I hardly need add the disclaimer that spanking is not beating. -drl

Not the typical teacher / kid couple - (broomberg) - (75) - June 29, 2004, 10:48:28 PM EDT

Ugh, toxic -NT - (deSitter) - June 29, 2004, 10:57:46 PM EDT

little shyte was braggin to whoever would listen - (boxley) - (1) - June 29, 2004, 10:58:25 PM EDT

Yup. Further reading shows I was right -NT - (broomberg) - June 29, 2004, 11:09:56 PM EDT

Best quote - (drewk) - June 29, 2004, 11:05:52 PM EDT

Darn it! - (lister) - (61) - June 29, 2004, 11:40:07 PM EDT

Re: Darn it! - (deSitter) - (60) - June 29, 2004, 11:47:00 PM EDT

Are you insane? - (broomberg) - (1) - June 29, 2004, 11:59:41 PM EDT

Ditto. -NT - (inthane-chan) - June 30, 2004, 12:04:38 AM EDT

How can you say something so stupid? - (drewk) - June 30, 2004, 12:03:43 AM EDT

Ditto Ditto - (lister) - (56) - June 30, 2004, 01:04:54 AM EDT

Invert the sexes -NT - (deSitter) - (55) - June 30, 2004, 05:08:36 AM EDT

Don't have to - (broomberg) - (3) - June 30, 2004, 06:42:04 AM EDT

Re: Don't have to - (deSitter) - (1) - June 30, 2004, 06:39:24 AM EDT

Reread my change - (broomberg) - June 30, 2004, 06:43:11 AM EDT

Yes -NT - (deSitter) - June 30, 2004, 06:45:04 AM EDT

Yep, double standard - (lister) - (46) - June 30, 2004, 10:47:08 AM EDT

Slight correction. - (inthane-chan) - (42) - June 30, 2004, 10:57:56 AM EDT

I'm in that group. - (mmoffitt) - (41) - June 30, 2004, 02:43:21 PM EDT

You knoiw? I think you're actually good for me... - (hnick) - (39) - June 30, 2004, 03:07:10 PM EDT

ICLRPD (new thread) - (pwhysall) - June 30, 2004, 03:10:33 PM EDT

By request: - (admin) - June 30, 2004, 03:27:12 PM EDT

This I deem an unfair reading of the simile - (Ashton) - (35) - June 30, 2004, 04:44:02 PM EDT

As always ... You Get It. And hnick et. al. don't. - (mmoffitt) - June 30, 2004, 04:55:15 PM EDT

And I disagree - (ben_tilly) - (26) - June 30, 2004, 05:32:57 PM EDT

Re: And I disagree - (Ashton) - (14) - June 30, 2004, 05:50:43 PM EDT

You should not drop marriage from the statement - (ben_tilly) - (13) - June 30, 2004, 06:07:49 PM EDT

Are we going to argue the meaning of "likely"? - (mmoffitt) - (12) - June 30, 2004, 06:10:30 PM EDT

Read my response to you below - (ben_tilly) - (11) - June 30, 2004, 06:48:44 PM EDT

Haven't read below, but I think I see the nub. - (mmoffitt) - (10) - June 30, 2004, 11:07:03 PM EDT

There is the reality, there is *also* the myth - (drewk) - (9) - June 30, 2004, 11:18:25 PM EDT

And the "myth" I actually experienced. - (mmoffitt) - (6) - June 30, 2004, 11:38:30 PM EDT

Sincere question - (drewk) - (3) - June 30, 2004, 11:48:36 PM EDT

Must? - (mmoffitt) - (2) - June 30, 2004, 11:58:41 PM EDT

Heh, must've seen too much Lifetime with my wife -NT - (drewk) - (1) - July 1, 2004, 12:02:14 AM EDT

She makes you watch that too? Thought it was only me ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - July 1, 2004, 12:06:01 AM EDT

There's more to your experience than that - (ben_tilly) - (1) - July 1, 2004, 12:38:44 AM EDT

Of course not. - (mmoffitt) - July 1, 2004, 12:44:41 AM EDT

Exactly -NT - (ben_tilly) - July 1, 2004, 12:35:44 AM EDT

Re: There is the reality, there is *also* the myth - (Nightowl) - July 4, 2004, 03:12:28 PM EDT

And so, what? - (mmoffitt) - (10) - June 30, 2004, 06:02:31 PM EDT

Nice ad hominems - (ben_tilly) - (9) - June 30, 2004, 06:47:02 PM EDT

FWIW I agree with your statement of The Problem - (Ashton) - June 30, 2004, 07:32:03 PM EDT

I guess I'm just thick. - (mmoffitt) - (7) - June 30, 2004, 11:48:58 PM EDT

I finally figured out the disconnect - (drewk) - (5) - June 30, 2004, 11:42:21 PM EDT

Yes. - (mmoffitt) - (3) - June 30, 2004, 11:47:31 PM EDT

No argument there - (broomberg) - July 1, 2004, 12:22:05 AM EDT

You've said nothing indicating that - (ben_tilly) - (1) - July 1, 2004, 12:49:10 AM EDT

Well, that certainly wasn't my intent. - (mmoffitt) - July 1, 2004, 12:53:07 AM EDT

Exactly, that's the tightrope that I have in mind - (ben_tilly) - July 1, 2004, 12:53:14 AM EDT

Loving lovely Love - (Ashton) - July 1, 2004, 05:02:44 AM EDT

Still disagree - (hnick) - (6) - June 30, 2004, 05:52:14 PM EDT

I am so glad my daughter has greater perspective than you. -NT - (mmoffitt) - June 30, 2004, 06:03:37 PM EDT

Your POV understood - (Ashton) - June 30, 2004, 06:07:05 PM EDT

The phrase "wife-whore dichotomy"... - (ben_tilly) - (2) - June 30, 2004, 06:57:20 PM EDT

I "grew upwards" - (Ashton) - (1) - June 30, 2004, 07:47:58 PM EDT

Point - (ben_tilly) - June 30, 2004, 09:09:52 PM EDT

Care to enlighten me? - (mmoffitt) - July 1, 2004, 12:04:57 AM EDT

Thanks for the sympathy. - (mmoffitt) - June 30, 2004, 04:56:58 PM EDT

Throwing kindling onto the fire then running away fast - (lincoln) - July 4, 2004, 07:23:45 PM EDT

No - (deSitter) - (2) - June 30, 2004, 12:42:10 PM EDT

Sure - - (Ashton) - (1) - June 30, 2004, 04:55:26 PM EDT

Re: Sure - - (deSitter) - June 30, 2004, 07:18:56 PM EDT

Equate the sexes - (ChrisR) - (3) - June 30, 2004, 01:09:21 PM EDT

You're damn right he would be - (deSitter) - (2) - June 30, 2004, 01:15:06 PM EDT

Horniness - (Ashton) - (1) - June 30, 2004, 05:34:01 PM EDT

Ah, "Tea and Sympathy". -NT - (a6l6e6x) - June 30, 2004, 09:01:04 PM EDT

So, size doesn't matter after all I guess. -NT - (mmoffitt) - June 29, 2004, 11:40:51 PM EDT

Simple Puritanism; our Muslim roots + hypocrisy. Victim!? -NT - (Ashton) - June 30, 2004, 01:57:53 AM EDT

Ahh, a successful thread - (broomberg) - (6) - June 30, 2004, 09:14:39 PM EDT

Gracias -NT - (ben_tilly) - June 30, 2004, 09:19:37 PM EDT

Who told you? - (drewk) - (3) - June 30, 2004, 09:24:08 PM EDT

Older brothers - (broomberg) - (2) - June 30, 2004, 09:34:32 PM EDT

TLA on South Street? - (drewk) - (1) - June 30, 2004, 10:47:01 PM EDT

Yup - (broomberg) - June 30, 2004, 10:57:11 PM EDT

Re: Ahh, a successful thread - (deSitter) - June 30, 2004, 09:26:38 PM EDT

I had lobster Marshall plan twice today...
97 ms