Don't have to

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #162,215 by broomberg 6/30/04 6:29:20 AM 6/30/04 6:42:04 AM Reply	Don't have to I can only speak from experience (or personal lack thereof). So I CAN speak for guys. Anyone who tells you having sex with a willing, well built, gorgeous, young teacher, for a guy student, at age 14, is harmful, and ALSO should be punished for it (as you said), is a repressed whack job. On the other hand, since you told ME to, YOU invert the sexes. The kid is guilty too. He allowed this bitch to ruin her own life. May his weener rot off. 14 is plenty old enough to know wrong and right. Would you pass this judgement on a 14 year old girl? Edited by broomberg June 30, 2004, 06:42:04 AM EDT Expand All History
Post #162,216 by deSitter 6/30/04 6:39:24 AM Reply	Re: Don't have to Well, my nephew down here is in jail for statutory rape. He was 22, she was 15. He didn't know. Her parents let him come over and stay. Then they decided, out of the blue, to prosecute. According to the law, he isn't "lewd and lascivious" - he's a rapist, forced to be on lists, register with police, etc. I say again - invert the sexes. It's a goddamn double standard and piss on it. Feminism in action. -drl
Post #162,217 by broomberg 6/30/04 6:43:11 AM Reply	Reread my change Going to work, not ignoring you...
Post #162,218 by deSitter 6/30/04 6:45:04 AM Reply	Yes -drl

Not the typical teacher / kid couple - (broomberg) - (75) - June 29, 2004, 10:48:28 PM EDT

Ugh, toxic -NT - (deSitter) - June 29, 2004, 10:57:46 PM EDT

little shyte was braggin to whoever would listen - (boxley) - (1) - June 29, 2004, 10:58:25 PM EDT

Yup. Further reading shows I was right -NT - (broomberg) - June 29, 2004, 11:09:56 PM EDT

Best quote - (drewk) - June 29, 2004, 11:05:52 PM EDT

Darn it! - (lister) - (61) - June 29, 2004, 11:40:07 PM EDT

Re: Darn it! - (deSitter) - (60) - June 29, 2004, 11:47:00 PM EDT

Are you insane? - (broomberg) - (1) - June 29, 2004, 11:59:41 PM EDT

Ditto. -NT - (inthane-chan) - June 30, 2004, 12:04:38 AM EDT

How can you say something so stupid? - (drewk) - June 30, 2004, 12:03:43 AM EDT

Ditto Ditto - (lister) - (56) - June 30, 2004, 01:04:54 AM EDT

Invert the sexes -NT - (deSitter) - (55) - June 30, 2004, 05:08:36 AM EDT

Don't have to - (broomberg) - (3) - June 30, 2004, 06:42:04 AM EDT

Re: Don't have to - (deSitter) - (1) - June 30, 2004, 06:39:24 AM EDT

Reread my change - (broomberg) - June 30, 2004, 06:43:11 AM EDT

Yes -NT - (deSitter) - June 30, 2004, 06:45:04 AM EDT

Yep, double standard - (lister) - (46) - June 30, 2004, 10:47:08 AM EDT

Slight correction. - (inthane-chan) - (42) - June 30, 2004, 10:57:56 AM EDT

I'm in that group. - (mmoffitt) - (41) - June 30, 2004, 02:43:21 PM EDT

You knoiw? I think you're actually good for me... - (hnick) - (39) - June 30, 2004, 03:07:10 PM EDT

ICLRPD (new thread) - (pwhysall) - June 30, 2004, 03:10:33 PM EDT

By request: - (admin) - June 30, 2004, 03:27:12 PM EDT

This I deem an unfair reading of the simile - (Ashton) - (35) - June 30, 2004, 04:44:02 PM EDT

As always ... You Get It. And hnick et. al. don't. - (mmoffitt) - June 30, 2004, 04:55:15 PM EDT

And I disagree - (ben_tilly) - (26) - June 30, 2004, 05:32:57 PM EDT

Re: And I disagree - (Ashton) - (14) - June 30, 2004, 05:50:43 PM EDT

You should not drop marriage from the statement - (ben_tilly) - (13) - June 30, 2004, 06:07:49 PM EDT

Are we going to argue the meaning of "likely"? - (mmoffitt) - (12) - June 30, 2004, 06:10:30 PM EDT

Read my response to you below - (ben_tilly) - (11) - June 30, 2004, 06:48:44 PM EDT

Haven't read below, but I think I see the nub. - (mmoffitt) - (10) - June 30, 2004, 11:07:03 PM EDT

There is the reality, there is *also* the myth - (drewk) - (9) - June 30, 2004, 11:18:25 PM EDT

And the "myth" I actually experienced. - (mmoffitt) - (6) - June 30, 2004, 11:38:30 PM EDT

Sincere question - (drewk) - (3) - June 30, 2004, 11:48:36 PM EDT

Must? - (mmoffitt) - (2) - June 30, 2004, 11:58:41 PM EDT

Heh, must've seen too much Lifetime with my wife -NT - (drewk) - (1) - July 1, 2004, 12:02:14 AM EDT

She makes you watch that too? Thought it was only me ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - July 1, 2004, 12:06:01 AM EDT

There's more to your experience than that - (ben_tilly) - (1) - July 1, 2004, 12:38:44 AM EDT

Of course not. - (mmoffitt) - July 1, 2004, 12:44:41 AM EDT

Exactly -NT - (ben_tilly) - July 1, 2004, 12:35:44 AM EDT

Re: There is the reality, there is *also* the myth - (Nightowl) - July 4, 2004, 03:12:28 PM EDT

And so, what? - (mmoffitt) - (10) - June 30, 2004, 06:02:31 PM EDT

Nice ad hominems - (ben_tilly) - (9) - June 30, 2004, 06:47:02 PM EDT

FWIW I agree with your statement of The Problem - (Ashton) - June 30, 2004, 07:32:03 PM EDT

I guess I'm just thick. - (mmoffitt) - (7) - June 30, 2004, 11:48:58 PM EDT

I finally figured out the disconnect - (drewk) - (5) - June 30, 2004, 11:42:21 PM EDT

Yes. - (mmoffitt) - (3) - June 30, 2004, 11:47:31 PM EDT

No argument there - (broomberg) - July 1, 2004, 12:22:05 AM EDT

You've said nothing indicating that - (ben_tilly) - (1) - July 1, 2004, 12:49:10 AM EDT

Well, that certainly wasn't my intent. - (mmoffitt) - July 1, 2004, 12:53:07 AM EDT

Exactly, that's the tightrope that I have in mind - (ben_tilly) - July 1, 2004, 12:53:14 AM EDT

Loving lovely Love - (Ashton) - July 1, 2004, 05:02:44 AM EDT

Still disagree - (hnick) - (6) - June 30, 2004, 05:52:14 PM EDT

I am so glad my daughter has greater perspective than you. -NT - (mmoffitt) - June 30, 2004, 06:03:37 PM EDT

Your POV understood - (Ashton) - June 30, 2004, 06:07:05 PM EDT

The phrase "wife-whore dichotomy"... - (ben_tilly) - (2) - June 30, 2004, 06:57:20 PM EDT

I "grew upwards" - (Ashton) - (1) - June 30, 2004, 07:47:58 PM EDT

Point - (ben_tilly) - June 30, 2004, 09:09:52 PM EDT

Care to enlighten me? - (mmoffitt) - July 1, 2004, 12:04:57 AM EDT

Thanks for the sympathy. - (mmoffitt) - June 30, 2004, 04:56:58 PM EDT

Throwing kindling onto the fire then running away fast - (lincoln) - July 4, 2004, 07:23:45 PM EDT

No - (deSitter) - (2) - June 30, 2004, 12:42:10 PM EDT

Sure - - (Ashton) - (1) - June 30, 2004, 04:55:26 PM EDT

Re: Sure - - (deSitter) - June 30, 2004, 07:18:56 PM EDT

Equate the sexes - (ChrisR) - (3) - June 30, 2004, 01:09:21 PM EDT

You're damn right he would be - (deSitter) - (2) - June 30, 2004, 01:15:06 PM EDT

Horniness - (Ashton) - (1) - June 30, 2004, 05:34:01 PM EDT

Ah, "Tea and Sympathy". -NT - (a6l6e6x) - June 30, 2004, 09:01:04 PM EDT

So, size doesn't matter after all I guess. -NT - (mmoffitt) - June 29, 2004, 11:40:51 PM EDT

Simple Puritanism; our Muslim roots + hypocrisy. Victim!? -NT - (Ashton) - June 30, 2004, 01:57:53 AM EDT

Ahh, a successful thread - (broomberg) - (6) - June 30, 2004, 09:14:39 PM EDT

Gracias -NT - (ben_tilly) - June 30, 2004, 09:19:37 PM EDT

Who told you? - (drewk) - (3) - June 30, 2004, 09:24:08 PM EDT

Older brothers - (broomberg) - (2) - June 30, 2004, 09:34:32 PM EDT

TLA on South Street? - (drewk) - (1) - June 30, 2004, 10:47:01 PM EDT

Yup - (broomberg) - June 30, 2004, 10:57:11 PM EDT

Re: Ahh, a successful thread - (deSitter) - June 30, 2004, 09:26:38 PM EDT

That's the kind of brilliant thinking that propelled you onto public access.
205 ms