IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

     Atrios writes on self driving cars again. - (Another Scott) - (17)
         Re: Atrios writes on self driving cars again. - (Ashton)
         IMO, the workable, sane solution comes from aviation. - (mmoffitt) - (10)
             And you think mass transit will have drivers? -NT - (drook) - (8)
                 Do trains? Do buses? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (7)
                     No and no - (drook) - (6)
                         Yeah. Finland is Just like LA. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (5)
                             The Detroit People Mover is automated. -NT - (malraux) - (3)
                                 hard to rob a robot -NT - (boxley)
                                 With human observers. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                     Not drivers though. - (malraux)
                             DLR is fully automatic - (pwhysall)
             "Has nothing to do with safety" - (malraux)
         2 problems, 2 solutions - (drook) - (4)
             Better solution: Get rid of automobiles. - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                 There's a lot to that. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                     Why would people want it? They are incredibly lazy. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                         Goddamn right. - (malraux)
     Here, or "News Picks?" - (rcareaga) - (6)
         If you look at what insurance adjusters do, much of that can be automated - (boxley) - (5)
             Mind you (heh, heh) - (rcareaga) - (4)
                 Correct, can AI create beauty? unknown. -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                     To clarify - (rcareaga) - (2)
                         What if they don't like insurance? - (drook) - (1)
                             Sic transit gzornenplatz, y'all.. -NT - (Ashton)
     "The Great A.I. Awakening" — quite long read at the NYT - (rcareaga) - (7)
         Another tip-off - (drook) - (1)
             That's the one that twigged me. - (malraux)
         After more pondering ... - (drook) - (4)
             Yeah, I don't think you'd want - (rcareaga) - (3)
                 Re: diplomacy. There are no guarantees even if human beings are involved. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                     Cold War nuance - (rcareaga) - (1)
                         "locker room talk." LOVE IT! -NT - (mmoffitt)
     [Testing:] Does starting a new thread expose problems? - (Another Scott) - (2)
         Re: [Testing:] Reply... - (Another Scott) - (1)
             Looks good here now as well - (scoenye)
     Drum: AI vacuums are stupid. - (Another Scott)
     A good primer: - (malraux) - (10)
         (Dupe) - how'd that happen? - Er, something's mangled... -NT - (Another Scott)
         And then came Tay... >:-) -NT - (scoenye)
         I think we'll see more of these discussions - (rcareaga) - (5)
             weak - (rcareaga) - (4)
                 It won't happen until it does. -NT - (malraux) - (3)
                     I think the "there's no dividing line" view is compelling. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                         Lots of sci fi on this - (drook) - (1)
                             Testing display -NT - (drook)
         [Testing:] Can I break it again? - (Another Scott) - (1)
             Re: [Testing:] Apparently not. Oh well. -NT - (Another Scott)

Spend a year in the army of a Nordic country, and you learn all there is to know about drying socks.
144 ms