IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Now viewing page 32 of 57
[Prev] 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ... 57 [Next]
     Compare & contrast: Windows scheduler vs. Unix cron? - (kmself) - (5)
         Re: Compare & contrast: Windows scheduler vs. Unix cron? - (andread)
         FWIW - (tseliot) - (2)
             o.t. "normity"? - (jbrabeck) - (1)
                 Naw, he's Norming. -NT - (inthane-chan)
         For what it's worth... - (screamer)
     Win XP Pro not reading Data CDs - (orion) - (5)
         well a data cd is a rockridge 9xxx file system - (boxley) - (1)
             Not quite - (pwhysall)
         Tried removing/reinstalling cd drive? -NT - (Silverlock) - (1)
             No, that doesn't work. - (Andrew Grygus)
         Don't know if it's still a problem... - (screamer)
     Microsoft Entertainment divison stumbles, awwww. - (folkert) - (17)
         A good way to write off the taxes on the loss - (orion) - (7)
             Almost below cost? - (Andrew Grygus) - (6)
                 I heard that a little differently. - (static) - (5)
                     Note on your .sig - (jake123) - (1)
                         Yep. - (static)
                     Gord comments on PS2 profits - (SpiceWare) - (2)
                         See, I was right . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                         That would be it. - (static)
         I thought after 3 years it was a hobby :-) -NT - (boxley) - (5)
             As long as you show a clear intent . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (4)
                 Aww.... - (folkert) - (3)
                     What if you *deliberately lose* money? - (drewk) - (2)
                         either way it is an expense and deductable -NT - (boxley)
                         Read "Catch-22" reference Milo Minderbender - (orion)
         XBox price slashed $20USD - (orion) - (1)
             You mean: Losing more than the did before per X-Box! -NT - (folkert)
         Microsoft also muffed it with Electronic Arts. - (a6l6e6x)
     Looks like we finally see the longhorn roadmap - (folkert) - (4)
         The "Longhorn" code name will have to go too . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3)
             Instead of Windows, they could just call it Gates :) - (orion) - (1)
                 Heh heh heh -NT - (Silverlock)
             No doubt! - (Yendor)
     The long arm of Longhorn - (orion)
     Bad Mozilla == dead Mozilla - (Ashton) - (4)
         Under Windoze, right? - (scoenye) - (3)
             Uh yes.. silly omission here. - (Ashton) - (2)
                 Your download (post) would look like this? - (jbrabeck) - (1)
                     Gosh.. you mean this has happened before?___Whillikers -NT - (Ashton)
     Windows shares from Linux -- concurrency, autofs? - (kmself) - (1)
         SMB automount solution - (kmself)
     I'Net Exploder graphics weirdness. - (Andrew Grygus) - (9)
         Clearing the cache makes 90% of unknown IE bugs go away. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (1)
             ROFL - +10 droll -NT - (deSitter)
         Re: I'Net Exploder graphics weirdness. - (deSitter) - (6)
             Doubt that's it . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (5)
                 Well if there is a GIF virus... - (admin) - (2)
                     IIRC there was a Windows virus that stored data in GIF files - (orion) - (1)
                         That was a bs "virus". - (inthane-chan)
                 Re: Doubt that's it . . - (pwhysall) - (1)
                     I'm aware of the .JPG thng, but .GIF is another matter. -NT - (Andrew Grygus)
     Future versions of windows to be more UNIX-y - (Steve Lowe) - (25)
         Those who do not understand UNIX - (pwhysall) - (1)
             Actually been hearing a nasty rumor. - (folkert)
         Windows Is Getting Performance-Killed - (deSitter) - (4)
             Iffen you want something like that - (jake123) - (3)
                 No doubt. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                     Depends on the meaning of "dead". - (Another Scott)
                     Well, not really - (jake123)
         A CLI-only version of Windows == DOS -NT - (jbrabeck) - (17)
             Funny, but wrong - (deSitter) - (16)
                 What do you propose then? WinDOS? - (folkert) - (13)
                     Or better yet... WinDoes? -NT - (folkert)
                     Or WinDoesn't -NT - (drewk) - (11)
                         Winux-- (minus minus version)? -NT - (folkert) - (10)
                             contentID whores... -NT - (admin) - (9)
                                 WindoesPD (Pant's down version) -NT - (folkert)
                                 You made us -NT - (drewk)
                                 C:Windows> -NT - (folkert)
                                 Everyone's trying to be 100K. ;-o -NT - (jbrabeck) - (5)
                                     And what's wrong with that? -NT - (Yendor) - (4)
                                         I mean, we only roll over... - (Yendor) - (3)
                                             Gah. Hopefully it will be a REAL post and not this crap. -NT - (admin) - (2)
                                                 Bah. What's wrong with this crap? ;-) -NT - (Yendor)
                                                 Posting halt called... <grin> - (jbrabeck)
                 95 could run like that, too. - (static) - (1)
                     The wiggle on that - (kmself)
     Microsoft makes strides on new Windows (Longhorn) - (orion) - (2)
         The question to ask is . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
             Reverse Feature Creep - (orion)
Now viewing page 32 of 57
[Prev] 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ... 57 [Next]

YOU DON'T EVEN RECOGNIZE THE *real* KNOPPIX INTERPRETER
603 ms