IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Regional/World Conflict Forum / Actually untrue...
Post #93,749
by Simon_Jester
4/2/03 11:33:37 AM
Reply
New Actually untrue...
what were the requirements of Bush incorporated?

Hint: they shifted as time went on - from allowing inspectors, to freeing political prisoners (yes, Bush actually required that) to Saddam Hussein leaving the country.

IMO - the only acceptable thing to Bush (et. al.) was Regime Change.
Post #93,753
by folkert
Picture of folkert
4/2/03 11:53:07 AM
Reply
New I was pointing out that the Protesters ABOUT...
Weapons of Mass Destruction... err Iraq's lack of them... err the Inspector's not finding them... err Saddamn "busy hiding" them...

Even *IF* we sold them to him in the 80s... WTF do think he is going to do with them.

Especially... ... ...

wait... ...

wait for it...

here it comes...









WHEN HE KNOWS WHERE AND WHEN THE INSPECTORS WERE GOING!


Why do you think the damned Inspectors couldn't find anything... then after we started parking troops near his border... did they "FIND" some minutia of the ones he has.

Would we have had to assemble 100% of the US Armed Forces on his border to get him to comply... nope... He continued to deny the inspectors access to certain areas. A bonus to lopping off the head... we get to find them then... and actually "unbind" certain repressed peoples of Iraq... (Shiite, Kurds and so-on) or are you claiming none of that happened either.

Now, Iraq had 12 years to comply with the "de-arming"... and we had inspectors in there for a LONG time before the 4 month stint... they pulled out themselves, as they were getting more and more resistence from Iraqi "Escorts and Officials"... Dunno 'bout but I am thinking you can't won't see any mention of those facts when some people go off here...
b4k4^2
[link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!]  
[link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Microsoft develops apps for Linux by 2004]
Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at checkpoints.
Post #93,755
by Simon_Jester
4/2/03 12:01:29 PM
Reply
New My only argument was with this line....

After all, he could have avoided war by simply making made a good-faith effort to cooperate with UN weapons inspectors.


Bush changed the requirements more than once...the only thing he was consistant on was regime change.
Post #93,757
by drewk
Picture of drewk
4/2/03 12:09:53 PM
Reply
New I've got to disagree
If Saddam had met the requirements and then the target moved, I'd agree with you. I think it's more accurate to say the target was moved because he didn't meet the previous ones.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
Post #93,761
by Simon_Jester
4/2/03 12:21:54 PM
Reply
New Are you saying he didn't release his prisoners?
Post #93,766
by drewk
Picture of drewk
4/2/03 12:58:13 PM
Reply
New Don't know about the prisoners
The main issue has (supposedly) always been the weapons. Every time he was given an ultimatum and didn't meet it, the stakes were raised.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
     No WMDs found yet, details of search - (JayMehaffey) - (20) - March 30, 2003, 02:12:14 PM EST
         60 mile radius? - (Brandioch) - (10) - March 30, 2003, 03:21:39 PM EST
             And one quote from that article. - (Brandioch) - (9) - March 30, 2003, 03:25:00 PM EST
                 Re: And one quote from that article. - (cybermace5) - (8) - March 30, 2003, 03:57:37 PM EST
                     Why look. Here's more from your past. - (Brandioch) - (7) - March 30, 2003, 04:26:53 PM EST
                         Re: Why look. Here's more from your past. - (cybermace5) - (6) - March 31, 2003, 12:07:42 PM EST
                             Like manufacturing "evidence" of Iraq's nuke program? - (Brandioch) - (5) - March 31, 2003, 01:40:57 PM EST
                                 Re: Like manufacturing "evidence" of Iraq's nuke program? - (cybermace5) - (4) - March 31, 2003, 02:25:15 PM EST
                                     This is where your ignorance betrays you. - (Brandioch) - (3) - March 31, 2003, 02:50:58 PM EST
                                         Re: This is where your ignorance betrays you. - (cybermace5) - (2) - March 31, 2003, 02:58:14 PM EST
                                             No - (jake123) - March 31, 2003, 04:30:54 PM EST
                                             Nope. - (Brandioch) - March 31, 2003, 06:18:01 PM EST
         Re: No WMDs found yet, details of search - (SpiceWare) - (8) - April 2, 2003, 11:11:10 AM EST
             Some good points in that article - (admin) - (7) - April 2, 2003, 11:22:34 AM EST
                 The last paragraph... - (folkert) - (6) - April 2, 2003, 11:26:45 AM EST
                     Actually untrue... - (Simon_Jester) - (5) - April 2, 2003, 11:33:37 AM EST
                         I was pointing out that the Protesters ABOUT... - (folkert) - (4) - April 2, 2003, 11:53:07 AM EST
                             My only argument was with this line.... - (Simon_Jester) - (3) - April 2, 2003, 12:01:29 PM EST
                                 I've got to disagree - (drewk) - (2) - April 2, 2003, 12:09:53 PM EST
                                     Are you saying he didn't release his prisoners? -NT - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - April 2, 2003, 12:21:54 PM EST
                                         Don't know about the prisoners - (drewk) - April 2, 2003, 12:58:13 PM EST

Now, with built-in MIDI ports!
54 ms