IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Regional/World Conflict Forum / yup ed zachery my prediction is coming true as we post
Post #92,708
by boxley
3/28/03 11:18:23 PM
Reply
New yup ed zachery my prediction is coming true as we post
for example you goaded me into a prediction. I made one. You are working very hard to make it come true. In case you forgot, here it is.
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=91631|http://z.iwethey.org...w?contentid=91631]
In case you havnt noticed his defence will be no matter what is found it wasnt acceptable proof to him.
I made that knowing you will prove it out for me. You are already intimating that anything found after the war will not be accepted as proof so my prediction WILL come true, yours MIGHT.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]

Since corporations are the equivelent of human but they have no "concience" they are by definition sociopaths
Post #92,710
by cybermace5
3/28/03 11:21:51 PM
Reply
New Nice.
Post #92,716
by Brandioch
3/28/03 11:33:33 PM
Reply
New Incorrect (as usual), Saddam can launch a chem attack.
That would be "proof" that I couldn't deny.

So, as long as my prediction is 100% accurate, you can say that I won't accept any "proof" that counters it.

Once again, Saddam will NOT use any nuke/chem/bio weapons.

The reason for this is because he does NOT have them.

So, to counter my prediction, all that has to happen is for Saddam to USE them.

And you find this concept too difficult to comprehend?

You are already intimating that anything found after the war will not be accepted as proof so my prediction WILL come true, yours MIGHT.
Incorrect.

If my prediction does NOT come true, then that means that Saddam will have used nuke/chem/bio weapons.

As such was the "proof" needed to disprove my prediction, your prediction would, likewise, be disproven.

So, if my prediction is correct, so is your's.
-and-
If my prediction is proven false, so is your's.

In other words, your "prediction" is a derivative of my prediction.

Original thought isn't big in your family, is it?
Post #92,731
by boxley
3/29/03 12:14:16 AM
Reply
New like I predicted brandiochan stand off thanx for affirming
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]

Since corporations are the equivelent of human but they have no "concience" they are by definition sociopaths
     Latest on chemical weapons - (marlowe) - (52) - March 28, 2003, 08:53:21 AM EST
         Consolidate these, please - (rcareaga) - (2) - March 28, 2003, 09:15:48 AM EST
             Toddlers are tiring, aren't they? -NT - (mmoffitt) - March 28, 2003, 10:41:53 AM EST
             When the other side starts consolidating, I'll consider it. - (marlowe) - March 28, 2003, 05:15:22 PM EST
         The only proof is prediction. - (Brandioch) - March 28, 2003, 09:52:13 AM EST
         Once the truth comes out - (orion) - (47) - March 28, 2003, 10:37:15 AM EST
             Shouldn't that be "Once the 'truth' comes out"? - (Brandioch) - (46) - March 28, 2003, 01:11:03 PM EST
                 Convieniant isn't it? - (folkert) - (2) - March 28, 2003, 03:10:36 PM EST
                     Can anyone translate this into English? - (Brandioch) - March 28, 2003, 03:24:08 PM EST
                     It just means he's setting up for my prediction to come true -NT - (boxley) - March 28, 2003, 03:40:49 PM EST
                 contra Brandioch - (rcareaga) - (42) - March 28, 2003, 03:30:03 PM EST
                     Re: contra Brandioch - (cybermace5) - (2) - March 28, 2003, 03:46:40 PM EST
                         nice save... - (rcareaga) - (1) - March 28, 2003, 04:32:43 PM EST
                             Vomiting's OK, but I didn't want you to have a heart attack! -NT - (cybermace5) - March 28, 2003, 04:41:20 PM EST
                     Thank you very much! -NT - (folkert) - March 28, 2003, 03:33:32 PM EST
                     I agree. - (Brandioch) - (28) - March 28, 2003, 05:42:47 PM EST
                         Re: I agree. - (cybermace5) - (27) - March 28, 2003, 05:48:13 PM EST
                             Haven't you been reading? - (Brandioch) - (26) - March 28, 2003, 06:55:03 PM EST
                                 Re: Haven't you been reading? - (cybermace5) - (25) - March 28, 2003, 09:11:06 PM EST
                                     What's this, then? - (rcareaga) - (2) - March 28, 2003, 09:19:28 PM EST
                                         Re: What's this, then? - (cybermace5) - March 28, 2003, 10:10:57 PM EST
                                         I think he killed one of his Look-a-likes - (orion) - March 28, 2003, 10:23:16 PM EST
                                     And that's the BEST shot you have? - (Brandioch) - (21) - March 28, 2003, 10:07:51 PM EST
                                         Re: And that's the BEST shot you have? - (cybermace5) - (20) - March 28, 2003, 10:14:09 PM EST
                                             We are invading Iraq because it is "pretty likely"? - (Brandioch) - (19) - March 28, 2003, 10:20:46 PM EST
                                                 Re: We are invading Iraq because it is "pretty likely"? - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 28, 2003, 10:30:48 PM EST
                                                     And ANOTHER slamdunk! - (Brandioch) - March 28, 2003, 10:49:04 PM EST
                                                 yup sure is - (boxley) - (16) - March 28, 2003, 10:37:07 PM EST
                                                     Here are free clues. - (Brandioch) - (15) - March 28, 2003, 10:42:38 PM EST
                                                         yup gonna be a toughie all right :-) -NT - (boxley) - March 28, 2003, 10:43:39 PM EST
                                                         No Proof yet... just your stupid "ASS"umptions! Loser! -NT - (folkert) - (13) - March 28, 2003, 10:43:47 PM EST
                                                             No solid proof either way - (orion) - (12) - March 28, 2003, 10:50:28 PM EST
                                                                 That's because YOU don't understand what a prediction is. - (Brandioch) - (11) - March 28, 2003, 11:06:24 PM EST
                                                                     yup ed zachery my prediction is coming true as we post - (boxley) - (3) - March 28, 2003, 11:18:23 PM EST
                                                                         Nice. -NT - (cybermace5) - March 28, 2003, 11:21:51 PM EST
                                                                         Incorrect (as usual), Saddam can launch a chem attack. - (Brandioch) - (1) - March 28, 2003, 11:33:33 PM EST
                                                                             like I predicted brandiochan stand off thanx for affirming -NT - (boxley) - March 29, 2003, 12:14:16 AM EST
                                                                     A prediction is just guessing - (orion) - (6) - March 29, 2003, 12:55:52 AM EST
                                                                         Tell that one to the Rapturin-out groupies.. -NT - (Ashton) - (1) - March 29, 2003, 03:38:18 AM EST
                                                                             Amen to that, brother! -NT - (a6l6e6x) - March 29, 2003, 12:49:02 PM EST
                                                                         Your sense of self-importance is vastly over rated. - (Brandioch) - (3) - March 29, 2003, 12:24:01 PM EST
                                                                             You should certainly know. -NT - (cybermace5) - March 29, 2003, 01:32:17 PM EST
                                                                             Do what now? Come again, do what? - (orion) - (1) - March 29, 2003, 04:46:44 PM EST
                                                                                 You can't tell the difference between a rocket and a "WMD". - (Brandioch) - March 30, 2003, 02:28:32 AM EST
                     He used them in the past - (orion) - (8) - March 28, 2003, 10:19:21 PM EST
                         You have no idea what you're talking about. - (Brandioch) - (7) - March 28, 2003, 10:38:56 PM EST
                             Are you saying we should have attacked NK instead of Iraq? - (orion) - (6) - March 28, 2003, 10:44:48 PM EST
                                 Okay, predict the lottery numbers for next week. - (Brandioch) - (5) - March 28, 2003, 11:17:19 PM EST
                                     But you didn't - (orion) - (4) - March 29, 2003, 12:52:19 AM EST
                                         By your logic, I did. - (Brandioch) - (3) - March 29, 2003, 12:32:17 PM EST
                                             When or ever? - (orion) - (2) - March 29, 2003, 04:52:42 PM EST
                                                 Class failed you. - (Ashton) - March 29, 2003, 09:56:26 PM EST
                                                 No, they are excuses. - (Brandioch) - March 30, 2003, 02:26:22 AM EST

Such twisted irony.
70 ms