IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New That's because YOU don't understand what a prediction is.
No solid proof either way
that Saddam has or has not have any WOMD.
No one can prove that Saddam does not have nuke/chem/bio weapons.

Even if he never uses them against US troops.

Maybe the elves are moving them when no one is looking.

The only thing you CAN prove is that he has them and the easiest way to prove this is when HE uses them.

Brand's comment about planting them, is not proved either, he is just guessing that the US troops will plant them.
If I told you, today, what the next winning lottery number would be. And I told you that I was predicting it.

And I was right.

That would still be just a "guess" to you, wouldn't it?

When the facts don't match your world-view, then those facts are wrong.

The winning lottery number.

Over a week in advance.

As a public prediction.

You still don't get it, do you?

Do you have any idea how many individual, distinct events had to happen so my prediction would be accurate?

If one were to listen to you and Marlowe...

#1. An advance strike kills Saddam
(how did I know there'd be an advance strike?)

#2. Saddam had, previously, ordered all the chemicals removed from the warheads
(how did I know that the warheads would be empty?)

#3. The initial strikes take out the chemical weapons without causing any chemical hazards
(how did I know that the rounds would be safe but that the weapons would be vulnerable?)

And so on.

If one were to listen to you and Marlowe, I'd have to have guessed right OVER and OVER and OVER.

Any single error and my prediction would have been proven wrong.
New yup ed zachery my prediction is coming true as we post
for example you goaded me into a prediction. I made one. You are working very hard to make it come true. In case you forgot, here it is.
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=91631|http://z.iwethey.org...w?contentid=91631]
In case you havnt noticed his defence will be no matter what is found it wasnt acceptable proof to him.
I made that knowing you will prove it out for me. You are already intimating that anything found after the war will not be accepted as proof so my prediction WILL come true, yours MIGHT.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]

Since corporations are the equivelent of human but they have no "concience" they are by definition sociopaths
New Nice.
New Incorrect (as usual), Saddam can launch a chem attack.
That would be "proof" that I couldn't deny.

So, as long as my prediction is 100% accurate, you can say that I won't accept any "proof" that counters it.

Once again, Saddam will NOT use any nuke/chem/bio weapons.

The reason for this is because he does NOT have them.

So, to counter my prediction, all that has to happen is for Saddam to USE them.

And you find this concept too difficult to comprehend?

You are already intimating that anything found after the war will not be accepted as proof so my prediction WILL come true, yours MIGHT.
Incorrect.

If my prediction does NOT come true, then that means that Saddam will have used nuke/chem/bio weapons.

As such was the "proof" needed to disprove my prediction, your prediction would, likewise, be disproven.

So, if my prediction is correct, so is your's.
-and-
If my prediction is proven false, so is your's.

In other words, your "prediction" is a derivative of my prediction.

Original thought isn't big in your family, is it?
New like I predicted brandiochan stand off thanx for affirming
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]

Since corporations are the equivelent of human but they have no "concience" they are by definition sociopaths
New A prediction is just guessing
prove me wrong by gussing the winning Powerball Lottery numbers for next week. We shall read the numbers and see if you are correct, Mr. Nostrodamus. Only then will I accept that you can predict the future.


"Bill gates cannot guarantee Windows, so how are you going to guarantee my safety?"
-John Crichton to the Emperor of the Scarrans on [link|http://www.farscape.com|FarScape]
New Tell that one to the Rapturin-out groupies..
New Amen to that, brother!
Alex

Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction. -- Blaise Pascal (1623-1662)
New Your sense of self-importance is vastly over rated.
So, a prediction is a "guess".

Believe whatever you want to.

One of us can predict how this war will unfold.

One of us cannot even "guess" at it but merely offer excuses on why things happen.

I have done what you cannot do and you still refuse to accept the facts.
New You should certainly know.
New Do what now? Come again, do what?
We cannot predict how the war will unfold, only guess. Your best guess is as good as mine.

What excuses? Provide some examples. Maybe I can figure out what you are yammering about.

What did you do that I could not do?


"Bill gates cannot guarantee Windows, so how are you going to guarantee my safety?"
-John Crichton to the Emperor of the Scarrans on [link|http://www.farscape.com|FarScape]
New You can't tell the difference between a rocket and a "WMD".
We cannot predict how the war will unfold, only guess. Your best guess is as good as mine.
In your dreams, maybe.

Here, let me [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=92922|link] you to your own stupidity.

I am still learning about this conflict, and I am trying to learn the facts and keep the fluff out of it.
But your guess is as good as mine?

hahahahhahahahahahaha

Maybe to YOU it is.

Meanwhile, I can predict (with 100% accuracy) how this war will unfold.

You cannot.

But your guess is as good as mine.

hahahahahahahahahaha

Go ahead. "Guess" when Saddam will use nuke/chem/bio weapons.

"Guess" what the Iraqi's next battlefield tactic will be.

ahahahhahahahahahahahaha

I am a GOD!
     Latest on chemical weapons - (marlowe) - (52)
         Consolidate these, please - (rcareaga) - (2)
             Toddlers are tiring, aren't they? -NT - (mmoffitt)
             When the other side starts consolidating, I'll consider it. - (marlowe)
         The only proof is prediction. - (Brandioch)
         Once the truth comes out - (orion) - (47)
             Shouldn't that be "Once the 'truth' comes out"? - (Brandioch) - (46)
                 Convieniant isn't it? - (folkert) - (2)
                     Can anyone translate this into English? - (Brandioch)
                     It just means he's setting up for my prediction to come true -NT - (boxley)
                 contra Brandioch - (rcareaga) - (42)
                     Re: contra Brandioch - (cybermace5) - (2)
                         nice save... - (rcareaga) - (1)
                             Vomiting's OK, but I didn't want you to have a heart attack! -NT - (cybermace5)
                     Thank you very much! -NT - (folkert)
                     I agree. - (Brandioch) - (28)
                         Re: I agree. - (cybermace5) - (27)
                             Haven't you been reading? - (Brandioch) - (26)
                                 Re: Haven't you been reading? - (cybermace5) - (25)
                                     What's this, then? - (rcareaga) - (2)
                                         Re: What's this, then? - (cybermace5)
                                         I think he killed one of his Look-a-likes - (orion)
                                     And that's the BEST shot you have? - (Brandioch) - (21)
                                         Re: And that's the BEST shot you have? - (cybermace5) - (20)
                                             We are invading Iraq because it is "pretty likely"? - (Brandioch) - (19)
                                                 Re: We are invading Iraq because it is "pretty likely"? - (cybermace5) - (1)
                                                     And ANOTHER slamdunk! - (Brandioch)
                                                 yup sure is - (boxley) - (16)
                                                     Here are free clues. - (Brandioch) - (15)
                                                         yup gonna be a toughie all right :-) -NT - (boxley)
                                                         No Proof yet... just your stupid "ASS"umptions! Loser! -NT - (folkert) - (13)
                                                             No solid proof either way - (orion) - (12)
                                                                 That's because YOU don't understand what a prediction is. - (Brandioch) - (11)
                                                                     yup ed zachery my prediction is coming true as we post - (boxley) - (3)
                                                                         Nice. -NT - (cybermace5)
                                                                         Incorrect (as usual), Saddam can launch a chem attack. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                                                                             like I predicted brandiochan stand off thanx for affirming -NT - (boxley)
                                                                     A prediction is just guessing - (orion) - (6)
                                                                         Tell that one to the Rapturin-out groupies.. -NT - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                                             Amen to that, brother! -NT - (a6l6e6x)
                                                                         Your sense of self-importance is vastly over rated. - (Brandioch) - (3)
                                                                             You should certainly know. -NT - (cybermace5)
                                                                             Do what now? Come again, do what? - (orion) - (1)
                                                                                 You can't tell the difference between a rocket and a "WMD". - (Brandioch)
                     He used them in the past - (orion) - (8)
                         You have no idea what you're talking about. - (Brandioch) - (7)
                             Are you saying we should have attacked NK instead of Iraq? - (orion) - (6)
                                 Okay, predict the lottery numbers for next week. - (Brandioch) - (5)
                                     But you didn't - (orion) - (4)
                                         By your logic, I did. - (Brandioch) - (3)
                                             When or ever? - (orion) - (2)
                                                 Class failed you. - (Ashton)
                                                 No, they are excuses. - (Brandioch)

We intend to respond to this matter pro-actively.
90 ms