yup sure is

Post #92,679

3/28/03 10:37:07 PM

yup sure is

So, when a demonstratable fact conflicts with your world-view.....
That fact is WRONG!

that is why were going to have a brandiochian stand off. For my prediction to fail you have to admit the error of yours. Interesting conumdrum :-)
thanx,
bill

will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]

Since corporations are the equivelent of human but they have no "concience" they are by definition sociopaths

Post #92,686

by Brandioch

3/28/03 10:42:38 PM

Here are free clues.

that is why were going to have a brandiochian stand off. For my prediction to fail you have to admit the error of yours. Interesting conumdrum :-)

#1. Try reading the entire thread.

#2. I don't care about whatever your fantasies are.

#3. I made my prediction before any of this started and it is STILL proven correct.

Post #92,688

by boxley

3/28/03 10:43:39 PM

yup gonna be a toughie all right :-)

Post #92,689

by folkert

3/28/03 10:43:47 PM

No Proof yet... just your stupid "ASS"umptions! Loser!

b4k4^2

[link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT

[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!]

[link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004]

Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints.

Post #92,693

by orion

3/28/03 10:50:28 PM

No solid proof either way

that Saddam has or has not have any WOMD.

All we have is speculation, US Military Intelligence suggests that he does have them, but is not using them currently.

Brand's comment about planting them, is not proved either, he is just guessing that the US troops will plant them. Saddam will claim this if they are found, even if he hid them and they found them. There is proof that he purchased nerve gas, mustard gas, etc in the past, and the destruction of those agents have not been accounted for yet. They could be on the moon (unlikely) for all we know! :)

"Bill gates cannot guarantee Windows, so how are you going to guarantee my safety?"
-John Crichton to the Emperor of the Scarrans on [link|http://www.farscape.com|FarScape]

Post #92,701

by Brandioch

3/28/03 11:06:24 PM

That's because YOU don't understand what a prediction is.

No solid proof either way
that Saddam has or has not have any WOMD.

No one can prove that Saddam does not have nuke/chem/bio weapons.

Even if he never uses them against US troops.

Maybe the elves are moving them when no one is looking.

The only thing you CAN prove is that he has them and the easiest way to prove this is when HE uses them.

Brand's comment about planting them, is not proved either, he is just guessing that the US troops will plant them.

If I told you, today, what the next winning lottery number would be. And I told you that I was predicting it.

And I was right.

That would still be just a "guess" to you, wouldn't it?

When the facts don't match your world-view, then those facts are wrong.

The winning lottery number.

Over a week in advance.

As a public prediction.

You still don't get it, do you?

Do you have any idea how many individual, distinct events had to happen so my prediction would be accurate?

If one were to listen to you and Marlowe...

#1. An advance strike kills Saddam
(how did I know there'd be an advance strike?)

#2. Saddam had, previously, ordered all the chemicals removed from the warheads
(how did I know that the warheads would be empty?)

#3. The initial strikes take out the chemical weapons without causing any chemical hazards
(how did I know that the rounds would be safe but that the weapons would be vulnerable?)

And so on.

If one were to listen to you and Marlowe, I'd have to have guessed right OVER and OVER and OVER.

Any single error and my prediction would have been proven wrong.

Post #92,708

by boxley

3/28/03 11:18:23 PM

yup ed zachery my prediction is coming true as we post

for example you goaded me into a prediction. I made one. You are working very hard to make it come true. In case you forgot, here it is.
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=91631|http://z.iwethey.org...w?contentid=91631]

In case you havnt noticed his defence will be no matter what is found it wasnt acceptable proof to him.

I made that knowing you will prove it out for me. You are already intimating that anything found after the war will not be accepted as proof so my prediction WILL come true, yours MIGHT.
thanx,
bill

Post #92,710

by cybermace5

3/28/03 11:21:51 PM

Nice.

Post #92,716

by Brandioch

3/28/03 11:33:33 PM

Incorrect (as usual), Saddam can launch a chem attack.

That would be "proof" that I couldn't deny.

So, as long as my prediction is 100% accurate, you can say that I won't accept any "proof" that counters it.

Once again, Saddam will NOT use any nuke/chem/bio weapons.

The reason for this is because he does NOT have them.

So, to counter my prediction, all that has to happen is for Saddam to USE them.

And you find this concept too difficult to comprehend?

You are already intimating that anything found after the war will not be accepted as proof so my prediction WILL come true, yours MIGHT.

Incorrect.

If my prediction does NOT come true, then that means that Saddam will have used nuke/chem/bio weapons.

As such was the "proof" needed to disprove my prediction, your prediction would, likewise, be disproven.

So, if my prediction is correct, so is your's.
-and-
If my prediction is proven false, so is your's.

In other words, your "prediction" is a derivative of my prediction.

Original thought isn't big in your family, is it?

Post #92,731

by boxley

3/29/03 12:14:16 AM

like I predicted brandiochan stand off thanx for affirming

Post #92,738

by orion

3/29/03 12:55:52 AM

A prediction is just guessing

prove me wrong by gussing the winning Powerball Lottery numbers for next week. We shall read the numbers and see if you are correct, Mr. Nostrodamus. Only then will I accept that you can predict the future.

"Bill gates cannot guarantee Windows, so how are you going to guarantee my safety?"
-John Crichton to the Emperor of the Scarrans on [link|http://www.farscape.com|FarScape]

Post #92,746

by Ashton

3/29/03 3:38:18 AM

Tell that one to the Rapturin-out groupies..

Post #92,818

by a6l6e6x

3/29/03 12:49:02 PM

Amen to that, brother!

Alex

Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction. -- Blaise Pascal (1623-1662)

Post #92,814

by Brandioch

3/29/03 12:24:01 PM

Your sense of self-importance is vastly over rated.

So, a prediction is a "guess".

Believe whatever you want to.

One of us can predict how this war will unfold.

One of us cannot even "guess" at it but merely offer excuses on why things happen.

I have done what you cannot do and you still refuse to accept the facts.

Post #92,832

by cybermace5

3/29/03 1:32:17 PM

You should certainly know.

Post #92,877

by orion

3/29/03 4:46:44 PM

Do what now? Come again, do what?

We cannot predict how the war will unfold, only guess. Your best guess is as good as mine.

What excuses? Provide some examples. Maybe I can figure out what you are yammering about.

What did you do that I could not do?

"Bill gates cannot guarantee Windows, so how are you going to guarantee my safety?"
-John Crichton to the Emperor of the Scarrans on [link|http://www.farscape.com|FarScape]

Post #93,001

by Brandioch

3/30/03 2:28:32 AM

You can't tell the difference between a rocket and a "WMD".

We cannot predict how the war will unfold, only guess. Your best guess is as good as mine.

In your dreams, maybe.

Here, let me [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=92922|link] you to your own stupidity.

I am still learning about this conflict, and I am trying to learn the facts and keep the fluff out of it.

But your guess is as good as mine?

hahahahhahahahahahaha

Maybe to YOU it is.

Meanwhile, I can predict (with 100% accuracy) how this war will unfold.

You cannot.

But your guess is as good as mine.

hahahahahahahahahaha

Go ahead. "Guess" when Saddam will use nuke/chem/bio weapons.

"Guess" what the Iraqi's next battlefield tactic will be.

ahahahhahahahahahahahaha

I am a GOD!

Welcome to IWETHEY!