IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Open Forum / Re: Poll: Resolution
Post #836
by dmarker2
7/4/01 10:24:07 AM
Reply
New Re: Poll: Resolution

FUG yaz all

- I'm gunna buy a 17in tft flat panel monitor then I too can go comfortably beyond 800 x 600. (damn !!! - had to give away all those bulky old 5081-19 IBM monitors before moving to HK - where aptmnts are so damn small that a 2in deep flat panel is thought of as bulky)

My work supplied notebook does 1024 x 768 & I can actually see the screen easier than my home 15in choobe which is a top of the range model with zilch flicker.

Thanks for giving me the incentive to go flat-panel TFT monitor (helps justify the expense to wife)

Cheers

Doug
Post #859
by Ashton
7/4/01 8:56:52 PM
Reply
New Well, now that I have more than the &^@# 1-MB video ...
on the brick-reliable Tecra now freed for notebook duty:

I *like* the 1024- on my Goldstar umm earlier.. primo 17" (good for 1280 or more, in principle). With fonts set to '12' I get good crisp def'n and thanks to Scott's Zopical prestidigit-ations - via the "narrower" box, a couple clicks = don't gotta scroll l/r either.

('Course he may not find the little er Zope mod, but..)

And the bkg. can next be a soothing and uniform color, soon's i mix one up. Try it!



A.
     Poll: Resolution - (jlalexander) - (25) - June 30, 2001, 06:47:41 PM EDT
         1400x1050 -NT - (admin) - June 30, 2001, 06:55:28 PM EDT
         1600x1200 -NT - (Yendor) - June 30, 2001, 06:43:18 PM EDT
         Whatever the max is. - (Brandioch) - (1) - June 30, 2001, 08:14:46 PM EDT
             Ditto. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - June 30, 2001, 08:25:08 PM EDT
         1024 X 768 -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - June 30, 2001, 09:07:00 PM EDT
         1280 x 1024 on home 19"; 1152 x 864 on work 17" -NT - (CRConrad) - June 30, 2001, 11:25:13 PM EDT
         Various. - (Another Scott) - July 1, 2001, 12:40:14 AM EDT
         1024x768 and 1280x1024 - (Steve Lowe) - July 1, 2001, 01:36:49 AM EDT
         1280x1024 - (altmann) - July 1, 2001, 04:52:10 AM EDT
         Standard 1024x768 - (static) - July 1, 2001, 07:54:19 AM EDT
         1280x1024x16M - (hnick) - July 1, 2001, 08:34:57 AM EDT
         Not so simple - (bepatient) - July 1, 2001, 01:12:57 PM EDT
         1152x864 -NT - (inthane-chan) - July 1, 2001, 01:32:41 PM EDT
         640 x 480 ;-) for now.. - (ashton2) - July 1, 2001, 04:56:32 PM EDT
         1600 x 1200; Browser sized to 1024 x 768 -NT - (drewk) - (3) - July 2, 2001, 10:08:05 AM EDT
             What mean? - (Ashton) - (2) - July 3, 2001, 04:14:40 PM EDT
                 Browser is always sized to 1024x768 - (drewk) - (1) - July 3, 2001, 06:29:26 PM EDT
                     Thanks - sorta see - it is a webdev choice.. -NT - (Ashton) - July 3, 2001, 07:02:39 PM EDT
         1024x768 -NT - (cforde) - July 2, 2001, 03:47:38 PM EDT
         Re: Poll: Resolution - (dmarker2) - (1) - July 4, 2001, 10:24:07 AM EDT
             Well, now that I have more than the &^@# 1-MB video ... - (Ashton) - July 4, 2001, 08:56:52 PM EDT
         Stats - (Andrew Grygus) - July 4, 2001, 12:06:45 PM EDT
         1024 x 768 at the moment - (Meerkat) - July 5, 2001, 07:07:59 AM EDT
         Re: Poll: Resolution - (qstephens) - (1) - July 5, 2001, 06:33:41 PM EDT
             Funny; I'm OK down to ~75 on those res's. -NT - (CRConrad) - July 5, 2001, 06:40:14 PM EDT

Where did you *think* lerpadisms come from?
133 ms