Poll: Resolution

Post #585 by jlalexander 6/30/01 6:47:41 PM Reply	Poll: Resolution A quick poll: What resolution do you normally run at? -Jason ---- My pid is Inigo Montoya. You "killed -9" my parent process. Prepare to vi.
Post #586 by admin 6/30/01 6:55:28 PM Reply	1400x1050 Regards, -scott anderson
Post #587 by Yendor 6/30/01 6:43:18 PM Reply	1600x1200 -YendorMike In order to understand recursion, one must understand recursion.
Post #588 by Brandioch 6/30/01 8:14:46 PM Reply	Whatever the max is. Right now, 1024x768
Post #590 by a6l6e6x 6/30/01 8:25:08 PM Reply	Ditto. Alex
Post #591 by Andrew Grygus 6/30/01 9:07:00 PM Reply	1024 X 768 [link\|www.aaxnet.com\|AAx]
Post #592 by CRConrad 6/30/01 11:25:13 PM Reply	1280 x 1024 on home 19"; 1152 x 864 on work 17"
Post #593 by Another Scott 7/1/01 12:40:14 AM Reply	Various. 17" Mac - 1024x768x16M - Sony 200sx 17" PC - 1600x1200x16M - Hitachi (mumble, and CM615) 19" PC - 1600x1200x16M - Hitachi (mumble, mumble) 14" PC - 1024x768x256 - Sony 1430 1600x1200 is very nice. It's hard to go back after using it. But you need modern hardware... Cheers, Scott.
Post #595 by Steve Lowe 7/1/01 1:36:49 AM Reply	1024x768 and 1280x1024 Main PC right now is work laptop. Run it at 1280x1024 on NEC 21" at work when docked, and at 1024x768 when away from the office on its LCD screen. --- Steve
Post #600 by altmann 7/1/01 4:52:10 AM Reply	1280x1024 1280x1024 on a 21" at home 1024x768 on a 17" at work. -- Chris Altmann
Post #602 by static 7/1/01 7:54:19 AM Reply	Standard 1024x768 ... since that's the max on this laptop. A lot of people live at this res nowadays so it's comfortable. I think my games PC is a bit higher, 1280x1024 rings a bell. I don't think my monitor likes 1600 across all that well. No, scratch that: my eyes don't like my monitor doing 1600! :-) My other PC, the one I just installed RH7.1 on, is as 1024x768, mostly because I had trouble making the X Server go and I knew it could do that resolution. My server stays in 80x25 text mode. Wade. "All around me are nothing but fakes Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"
Post #607 by hnick 7/1/01 8:34:57 AM Reply	1280x1024x16M My monitor can do better. My eyes are the limiting factor Hugh
Post #614 by bepatient 7/1/01 1:12:57 PM Reply	Not so simple Lap...1024x768 cause thats all there is 19 inch home mon 16x12 or 1280x1024 depending on what I'm doing 17 inch office 1280x1024 15 inch home 1024x768 Thats the basic ones...but I'll bounce resolutions frequently depending on task and time...if I'm wandering about the room I'll run a lower res so I can read the screens from farther away... Preferred....1280x1024...thats a good balance for me it seems. [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient] Um...er...well...I have no choice!
Post #616 by inthane-chan 7/1/01 1:32:41 PM Reply	1152x864
Post #624 by ashton2 7/1/01 4:56:32 PM Reply	640 x 480 ;-) for now.. OK it's an old Optiquest 15" - but not a bad forum test for folks what ain't got lots o' bread but still want enlightenment from the WMEIAGs (Who Me? I be a God) Seems to handle the er extra CRs - though posting at this res. entails some L/R scrolling. A.
Post #649 by drewk 7/2/01 10:08:05 AM Reply	1600 x 1200; Browser sized to 1024 x 768 This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
Post #799 by Ashton 7/3/01 4:14:40 PM Reply	What mean? How do you set a different browser res? or is this terminology I'm taking too literally? A.
Post #811 by drewk 7/3/01 6:29:26 PM Reply	Browser is always sized to 1024x768 Most sites are still designed to either 800x600 or 1024x768. If I leave the browser maximized, the lines of text on many of these end up too long to read comfortably. So I guess technically the browser size has nothing to do with the resolution the monitor is set at, but usually when someone asks this question they're interested in how much real estate they can design to. This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
Post #813 by Ashton 7/3/01 7:02:39 PM Reply	Thanks - sorta see - it is a webdev choice..
Post #685 by cforde 7/2/01 3:47:38 PM Reply	1024x768 Have fun, Carl Forde
Post #836 by dmarker2 7/4/01 10:24:07 AM Reply	Re: Poll: Resolution FUG yaz all - I'm gunna buy a 17in tft flat panel monitor then I too can go comfortably beyond 800 x 600. (damn !!! - had to give away all those bulky old 5081-19 IBM monitors before moving to HK - where aptmnts are so damn small that a 2in deep flat panel is thought of as bulky) My work supplied notebook does 1024 x 768 & I can actually see the screen easier than my home 15in choobe which is a top of the range model with zilch flicker. Thanks for giving me the incentive to go flat-panel TFT monitor (helps justify the expense to wife) Cheers Doug
Post #859 by Ashton 7/4/01 8:56:52 PM Reply	Well, now that I have more than the &amp;^@# 1-MB video ... on the brick-reliable Tecra now freed for notebook duty: I like the 1024- on my Goldstar umm earlier.. primo 17" (good for 1280 or more, in principle). With fonts set to '12' I get good crisp def'n and thanks to Scott's Zopical prestidigit-ations - via the "narrower" box, a couple clicks = don't gotta scroll l/r either. ('Course he may not find the little er Zope mod, but..) And the bkg. can next be a soothing and uniform color, soon's i mix one up. Try it! A.
Post #839 by Andrew Grygus 7/4/01 12:06:45 PM Reply	Stats Res My Site / Global 640x480 2% 5% 800x600 24% 56% 1024x768 46% 30% 1152x864 7% 2% 1280x1024 13% 2% 1600x1200 3% 0% [link\|www.aaxnet.com\|AAx]
Post #869 by Meerkat 7/5/01 7:07:59 AM Reply	1024 x 768 at the moment ... as I'm on the iBook. Work PC & Main PC at home: 1152 x 864 On and on and on and on, and on and on and on goes John.
Post #926 by qstephens 7/5/01 6:33:41 PM Reply	Re: Poll: Resolution 1024x768@100Hz at home (17" monitor) 1152x864@100Hz at work (19" monitor) At such high resolutions, I find anything below 85 Hz intolerable, and 85Hz isn't too comfortable for an extended period, though it's good for lower resolutions. qts
Post #929 by CRConrad 7/5/01 6:40:14 PM Reply	Funny; I'm OK down to ~75 on those res's.

Welcome to IWETHEY!