I suppose 'it' might. Whatever 'it' is.
The question you will never answer:
What is 'it' that 'conservatives' want to conserve?
(an immediate clash with the connotation of 'conservation' makes 'it' even fuzzier)
Oh.. Besides the status-quo: that used to be called reactionary however, before there was bafflegab
Never mind. It's so suave a mindless-slogan, it could only be diminished in effectiveness by any attempt to find if any two people have the same definition.
Ashton