Hate to do it... - (bepatient) - (42) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:51:13 AM EST
         Given that Churchill is compared to Bush, you - (a6l6e6x) - (11) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:39:56 PM EST
             Churchill was no gnat. - (marlowe) - (3) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:44:25 PM EST
                 That's cute. - (Brandioch) - (2) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:50:31 PM EST
                     Irony is wasted on the stupid. - (marlowe) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:51:34 PM EST
                         I will now explain "irony" to you. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:05:48 PM EST
             I can see you didn't read very closely. - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:54:08 PM EST
                 Re: quick rejection of ideas? - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:28:29 PM EST
                     A false premise based upon the quick dismissal -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:32:35 PM EST
                 Re: zionist pawns and such. - (a6l6e6x) - (3) - Feb. 20, 2003, 05:09:39 PM EST
                     If G_d didnt want the Jews to have the land back - (boxley) - Feb. 20, 2003, 05:12:36 PM EST
                     Nice read, although one "obvious" thing eludes the author. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 21, 2003, 01:53:14 PM EST
                     Recursive traps are so.. so jejeune? - (Ashton) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:15:30 PM EST
         I like the strange bedfellows part - (boxley) - (29) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:13:19 PM EST
             Left schmeft - bloody labels that merely serve to ... - (dmarker) - (3) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:12:11 PM EST
                 lets talk about them - (boxley) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:17:44 PM EST
                 Yes...lets. - (bepatient) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:36:41 PM EST
                     Wrong: NOT "enemies of the United States" - (Ashton) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:05:42 AM EST
             You need to check your facts. - (Brandioch) - (24) - Feb. 21, 2003, 09:54:05 AM EST
                 not my facts pal, a quote from the link - (boxley) - (4) - Feb. 21, 2003, 10:53:34 AM EST
                     So you're saying you don't agree with that? - (Brandioch) - (3) - Feb. 21, 2003, 12:55:22 PM EST
                         I got yer balls right here - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 21, 2003, 02:59:13 PM EST
                             Damn. And no one took my bet. :( - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 21, 2003, 05:29:00 PM EST
                                 poor baby, -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:13:01 PM EST
                 Hmm. - (bepatient) - (18) - Feb. 21, 2003, 06:27:04 PM EST
                     I like this quote - (boxley) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:16:42 PM EST
                     Only an Econ-minor could make this leap - (Ashton) - (16) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:50:29 PM EST
                         Dunno what the degree was... - (bepatient) - (13) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:59:12 PM EST
                             Give me an "e"! -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 22, 2003, 03:57:02 PM EST
                             You 'read' OK; it's your logic that's rilly Econ-fluffy - (Ashton) - (11) - Feb. 23, 2003, 03:52:33 AM EST
                                 Nothing like that. - (bepatient) - (10) - Feb. 23, 2003, 11:05:52 AM EST
                                     Odd you should mention "machines underneath" - (Ashton) - (9) - Feb. 24, 2003, 05:54:42 AM EST
                                         No its not. - (bepatient) - (8) - Feb. 24, 2003, 07:30:35 AM EST
                                             Now we get to.. Suddenly it's 1950 - (Ashton) - (7) - Feb. 24, 2003, 08:21:46 PM EST
                                                 I wonder how many... - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 25, 2003, 12:27:05 AM EST
                                                     This is just delicious - (Silverlock) - (5) - Feb. 25, 2003, 01:39:47 PM EST
                                                         And this has precisely what to do with anything? - (bepatient) - (4) - Feb. 25, 2003, 02:57:31 PM EST
                                                             Nope. - (Silverlock) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2003, 03:08:01 PM EST
                                                                 Ironic in what sense? - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 25, 2003, 03:23:41 PM EST
                                                                     Oh, come on. - (Silverlock) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2003, 04:06:22 PM EST
                                                                         No question. - (bepatient) - Feb. 25, 2003, 05:44:52 PM EST
                         I can explain that. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 22, 2003, 01:15:20 PM EST
                             you mean like this? - (boxley) - Feb. 22, 2003, 05:47:25 PM EST