IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Regional/World Conflict Forum / I can see you didn't read very closely.
Post #82,951
by bepatient
Picture of bepatient
2/20/03 1:54:08 PM
Reply
New I can see you didn't read very closely.
Because there wasn't a comparison made between Churchill and Bush. Only a comparison to what the enemy has deemed them...zionist pawns.

Another quick rejection of ideas that differ.

Trendspotting.
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
Post #82,959
by a6l6e6x
Picture of a6l6e6x
2/20/03 2:28:29 PM
Reply
New Re: quick rejection of ideas?
More like a rejection of a premise.
Alex
"No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session."\t-- Mark Twain
Post #82,962
by bepatient
Picture of bepatient
2/20/03 2:32:35 PM
Reply
New A false premise based upon the quick dismissal
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
Post #83,007
by a6l6e6x
Picture of a6l6e6x
2/20/03 5:09:39 PM
Reply
New Re: zionist pawns and such.
One does not have to hang such crap on those who are not part of the Bush league. Here are some thoughts closer to what my view is: [link|http://www.cato.org/dailys/06-04-02.html|Crackpot Theology Makes Bad Foreign Policy].
Alex
"No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session."\t-- Mark Twain
Post #83,009
by boxley
2/20/03 5:12:36 PM
Reply
New If G_d didnt want the Jews to have the land back
he wouldnt have invented hitler. :-)
thanx,
bill
who also works in mysterious ways
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #83,191
by mmoffitt
2/21/03 1:53:14 PM
Reply
New Nice read, although one "obvious" thing eludes the author.
He writes:

And if the land was to belong to Jews forever, why did they lose control of it? Surely God does not require America's assistance to give it back.


Only the least observant of us would fail to grasp that We, the People of the United States of America, in order to form a more perfect Union have become "Christian Soldiers". Of course God would require the assistance of his one, true Army.

bcnu,
Mikem

Osama bin Laden's brother could fly in US airspace 9/15/01, but I had to wait for FBI and CIA background checks, 'nuff said?
Post #83,276
by Ashton
2/21/03 8:15:30 PM
Reply
New Recursive traps are so.. so jejeune?
When one is in the throes of crackpot theology -- all else heard, are words of that Ol Debbil. Especially the measured intelligent logical progressions: just go to show How devious be Ol Debbil.

(Kinda like Ol gawd a hidin them fossils n'stuff.. so's to disguise the Truth of Creationism from the yokels. That Ol Gawd fella - Him love pull wings off flies shipwrecked on islands; why He be the noblest invention of Man, some say)

288. ARGUMENT FROM BRAINWASHING

1) Atheists claim that Christians have been brainwashed by churches, priests and religious environment.
2) Yeah, well, you have been brainwashed by secular colleges and universities! Your brainwashing keeps you from the Truth!
3) Therefore, God exists.


290. ARGUMENT FROM WHATEVER I DO

1) Sometimes I do good things, and sometimes I do bad things.
2) When I do good things, this proves that God is helping me to be good.
3) When I do bad things, this proves that the devil has tempted me to do evil, and I need God's help to overcome temptation.
4) So whatever I do, it proves that God exists.
5) Therefore, God exists


Ashton, Nonexistant
     Hate to do it... - (bepatient) - (42) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:51:13 AM EST
         Given that Churchill is compared to Bush, you - (a6l6e6x) - (11) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:39:56 PM EST
             Churchill was no gnat. - (marlowe) - (3) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:44:25 PM EST
                 That's cute. - (Brandioch) - (2) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:50:31 PM EST
                     Irony is wasted on the stupid. - (marlowe) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:51:34 PM EST
                         I will now explain "irony" to you. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:05:48 PM EST
             I can see you didn't read very closely. - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 20, 2003, 01:54:08 PM EST
                 Re: quick rejection of ideas? - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:28:29 PM EST
                     A false premise based upon the quick dismissal -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:32:35 PM EST
                 Re: zionist pawns and such. - (a6l6e6x) - (3) - Feb. 20, 2003, 05:09:39 PM EST
                     If G_d didnt want the Jews to have the land back - (boxley) - Feb. 20, 2003, 05:12:36 PM EST
                     Nice read, although one "obvious" thing eludes the author. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 21, 2003, 01:53:14 PM EST
                     Recursive traps are so.. so jejeune? - (Ashton) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:15:30 PM EST
         I like the strange bedfellows part - (boxley) - (29) - Feb. 20, 2003, 02:13:19 PM EST
             Left schmeft - bloody labels that merely serve to ... - (dmarker) - (3) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:12:11 PM EST
                 lets talk about them - (boxley) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:17:44 PM EST
                 Yes...lets. - (bepatient) - (1) - Feb. 20, 2003, 11:36:41 PM EST
                     Wrong: NOT "enemies of the United States" - (Ashton) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:05:42 AM EST
             You need to check your facts. - (Brandioch) - (24) - Feb. 21, 2003, 09:54:05 AM EST
                 not my facts pal, a quote from the link - (boxley) - (4) - Feb. 21, 2003, 10:53:34 AM EST
                     So you're saying you don't agree with that? - (Brandioch) - (3) - Feb. 21, 2003, 12:55:22 PM EST
                         I got yer balls right here - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 21, 2003, 02:59:13 PM EST
                             Damn. And no one took my bet. :( - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 21, 2003, 05:29:00 PM EST
                                 poor baby, -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:13:01 PM EST
                 Hmm. - (bepatient) - (18) - Feb. 21, 2003, 06:27:04 PM EST
                     I like this quote - (boxley) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:16:42 PM EST
                     Only an Econ-minor could make this leap - (Ashton) - (16) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:50:29 PM EST
                         Dunno what the degree was... - (bepatient) - (13) - Feb. 21, 2003, 08:59:12 PM EST
                             Give me an "e"! -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 22, 2003, 03:57:02 PM EST
                             You 'read' OK; it's your logic that's rilly Econ-fluffy - (Ashton) - (11) - Feb. 23, 2003, 03:52:33 AM EST
                                 Nothing like that. - (bepatient) - (10) - Feb. 23, 2003, 11:05:52 AM EST
                                     Odd you should mention "machines underneath" - (Ashton) - (9) - Feb. 24, 2003, 05:54:42 AM EST
                                         No its not. - (bepatient) - (8) - Feb. 24, 2003, 07:30:35 AM EST
                                             Now we get to.. Suddenly it's 1950 - (Ashton) - (7) - Feb. 24, 2003, 08:21:46 PM EST
                                                 I wonder how many... - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 25, 2003, 12:27:05 AM EST
                                                     This is just delicious - (Silverlock) - (5) - Feb. 25, 2003, 01:39:47 PM EST
                                                         And this has precisely what to do with anything? - (bepatient) - (4) - Feb. 25, 2003, 02:57:31 PM EST
                                                             Nope. - (Silverlock) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2003, 03:08:01 PM EST
                                                                 Ironic in what sense? - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 25, 2003, 03:23:41 PM EST
                                                                     Oh, come on. - (Silverlock) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2003, 04:06:22 PM EST
                                                                         No question. - (bepatient) - Feb. 25, 2003, 05:44:52 PM EST
                         I can explain that. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 22, 2003, 01:15:20 PM EST
                             you mean like this? - (boxley) - Feb. 22, 2003, 05:47:25 PM EST

I don't usually win conversations this decisively.
66 ms