I don't like brandioch's logic train
I don't like organized crime.....
But when I oppose a mob hit on a bar where Brandioch is dispensing logic
That means I support child molestation?
:-)
thanx,
bill
Hate to do it...
- (bepatient)
- (42)
- Feb. 20, 2003, 11:51:13 AM EST
Given that Churchill is compared to Bush, you
- (a6l6e6x)
- (11)
- Feb. 20, 2003, 01:39:56 PM EST
Churchill was no gnat.
- (marlowe)
- (3)
- Feb. 20, 2003, 01:44:25 PM EST
That's cute.
- (Brandioch)
- (2)
- Feb. 20, 2003, 01:50:31 PM EST
Irony is wasted on the stupid.
- (marlowe)
- (1)
- Feb. 20, 2003, 01:51:34 PM EST
I will now explain "irony" to you.
- (Brandioch)
- Feb. 20, 2003, 02:05:48 PM EST
I can see you didn't read very closely.
- (bepatient)
- (6)
- Feb. 20, 2003, 01:54:08 PM EST
Re: quick rejection of ideas?
- (a6l6e6x)
- (1)
- Feb. 20, 2003, 02:28:29 PM EST
A false premise based upon the quick dismissal
-NT
- (bepatient)
- Feb. 20, 2003, 02:32:35 PM EST
Re: zionist pawns and such.
- (a6l6e6x)
- (3)
- Feb. 20, 2003, 05:09:39 PM EST
If G_d didnt want the Jews to have the land back
- (boxley)
- Feb. 20, 2003, 05:12:36 PM EST
Nice read, although one "obvious" thing eludes the author.
- (mmoffitt)
- Feb. 21, 2003, 01:53:14 PM EST
Recursive traps are so.. so jejeune?
- (Ashton)
- Feb. 21, 2003, 08:15:30 PM EST
I like the strange bedfellows part
- (boxley)
- (29)
- Feb. 20, 2003, 02:13:19 PM EST
Left schmeft - bloody labels that merely serve to ...
- (dmarker)
- (3)
- Feb. 20, 2003, 11:12:11 PM EST
lets talk about them
- (boxley)
- Feb. 20, 2003, 11:17:44 PM EST
Yes...lets.
- (bepatient)
- (1)
- Feb. 20, 2003, 11:36:41 PM EST
Wrong: NOT "enemies of the United States"
- (Ashton)
- Feb. 21, 2003, 08:05:42 AM EST
You need to check your facts.
- (Brandioch)
- (24)
- Feb. 21, 2003, 09:54:05 AM EST
not my facts pal, a quote from the link
- (boxley)
- (4)
- Feb. 21, 2003, 10:53:34 AM EST
So you're saying you don't agree with that?
- (Brandioch)
- (3)
- Feb. 21, 2003, 12:55:22 PM EST
I got yer balls right here
- (boxley)
- (2)
- Feb. 21, 2003, 02:59:13 PM EST
Damn. And no one took my bet. :(
- (Brandioch)
- (1)
- Feb. 21, 2003, 05:29:00 PM EST
poor baby,
-NT
- (boxley)
- Feb. 21, 2003, 08:13:01 PM EST
Hmm.
- (bepatient)
- (18)
- Feb. 21, 2003, 06:27:04 PM EST
I like this quote
- (boxley)
- Feb. 21, 2003, 08:16:42 PM EST
Only an Econ-minor could make this leap
- (Ashton)
- (16)
- Feb. 21, 2003, 08:50:29 PM EST
Dunno what the degree was...
- (bepatient)
- (13)
- Feb. 21, 2003, 08:59:12 PM EST
Give me an "e"!
-NT
- (bepatient)
- Feb. 22, 2003, 03:57:02 PM EST
You 'read' OK; it's your logic that's rilly Econ-fluffy
- (Ashton)
- (11)
- Feb. 23, 2003, 03:52:33 AM EST
Nothing like that.
- (bepatient)
- (10)
- Feb. 23, 2003, 11:05:52 AM EST
Odd you should mention "machines underneath"
- (Ashton)
- (9)
- Feb. 24, 2003, 05:54:42 AM EST
No its not.
- (bepatient)
- (8)
- Feb. 24, 2003, 07:30:35 AM EST
Now we get to.. Suddenly it's 1950
- (Ashton)
- (7)
- Feb. 24, 2003, 08:21:46 PM EST
I wonder how many...
- (bepatient)
- (6)
- Feb. 25, 2003, 12:27:05 AM EST
This is just delicious
- (Silverlock)
- (5)
- Feb. 25, 2003, 01:39:47 PM EST
And this has precisely what to do with anything?
- (bepatient)
- (4)
- Feb. 25, 2003, 02:57:31 PM EST
Nope.
- (Silverlock)
- (3)
- Feb. 25, 2003, 03:08:01 PM EST
Ironic in what sense?
- (bepatient)
- (2)
- Feb. 25, 2003, 03:23:41 PM EST
Oh, come on.
- (Silverlock)
- (1)
- Feb. 25, 2003, 04:06:22 PM EST
No question.
- (bepatient)
- Feb. 25, 2003, 05:44:52 PM EST
I can explain that.
- (Brandioch)
- (1)
- Feb. 22, 2003, 01:15:20 PM EST
you mean like this?
- (boxley)
- Feb. 22, 2003, 05:47:25 PM EST