not fer nuttin but

Post #63,703 by boxley 11/18/02 10:36:50 PM Reply	not fer nuttin but the first twin towers bombing was treated as a crime and a few were convicted icluded the mosque leader imam something or other and it completely pissed off the muslims who vowed to bring the towers down because that ignorant fuck was in a jail cell. Been there, done that have the tshirt. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] "Fifty-one percent of a nation can establish a totalitarian regime, suppress minorities and still remain democratic." Correction: All that can be achieved with 51 percent of the voters!" Ilanna Mercer
Post #63,714 by deSitter 11/18/02 11:13:11 PM Reply	Hey I said it was a crime - not that I wanted to read him his rights. You have the right to eat a Hellfire missle. -drl I'm so happy I could scalp someone. Mark Twain
Post #63,722 by jake123 11/19/02 12:14:48 AM Reply	The only problem with that is... that a lot of people that had nothing to do with it end up having the right to eat hellfire missiles too. Some guy from the local version of the KKK goes and does a whackjob on some powerful country, and then the whole place gets bombed flat. You get bombed flat. Everybody gets bombed flat. And most of them had nothing to do with it. This is not a good place to be, strictly from an ethical perspective. This is bad behaviour. I'm not saying that going and getting these guys is a bad idea at all. Personally, I want to see them get nailed. It was a horrible thing that they did. But killing a lot of people that had nothing to do with it is not going to help. --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Laval Qu\ufffdbec Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Post #63,754 by deSitter 11/19/02 9:26:30 AM Reply	Ethical Dilemma Yes We got into the current situation because of what you might call an ethical dilemma - we could have taken out a lot of people on the sly when we had good intelligence from operatives close to the sources (see Bob Baer). But "that wasn't ethical". But, was it ethical to expose the 3000 who died on 9/11 by refusing to "do the wrong thing"? It's a brutal world. Let the ethical "mistakes" happen on the front end. I'm totally in favor of highly targeted attacks against the bad guys, the terrifying kind that keeps them looking over their shoulders. These guys should walk around with a black cloud over them, and people should learn that hanging out with them or near them is a bad idea. -drl I'm so happy I could scalp someone. Mark Twain
Post #63,725 by Brandioch 11/19/02 12:37:22 AM Reply	There will always be those. They are called "fanatics". The good news is that they are a very small minority of the population. Unless we start making them famous and heroic.

Welcome to IWETHEY!