Ohhhhhh I see now

Post #58,457 by Mike 10/22/02 3:35:56 PM Reply	Ohhhhhh I see now When you said "friendly"..... I thought you were re-phrasing one of Bill Patients posts from a few months ago. I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Post #58,484 by Brandioch 10/22/02 5:14:12 PM Reply	Nice "cover". :) You have a problem understanding what the >"< means around "friendly". You try to find a post where I said Kuwait was friendly. (no "s). You find one. But you fail to understand the CONTEXT of that post. So, when you link to it saying that I was arguing that Kuwait was friendly to the US.... Now you're saying that you thought my post from TODAY was me re-phrasing an argument from Bill Pathetic from MONTHS ago. hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaha ahhahahahahahahaha The post that you had to link to to "prove" that I changed my story? hahahahhahahahahah
Post #58,486 by bepatient 10/22/02 5:16:12 PM Reply	Hard to understand context... ...when you seem to be making it up as you go along. But then its nice to see you so eager and able to amuse yourself. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #58,492 by Brandioch 10/22/02 5:22:13 PM Reply	I expect that from you. You make a statement. The facts show that your statement is incorrect. You blame ME because YOU made an incorrect statement. No. YOU will NEVER understand CONTEXT. You stated that Kuwait was our friend. So, you will have no trouble taking up dmarker's offer? I didn't think so. hahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahaahahaha But it's all MY fault. My fault! All my fault. hahahahahahhahahahahaha
Post #58,495 by bepatient 10/22/02 5:26:12 PM Reply	You are amusing. And since you seem to invent your own context I'm sure you'll continue to enjoy yourself. Here's to Uzbekistan becoming a force in MidEast politics... It could happen. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #58,497 by Mike 10/22/02 5:38:56 PM Reply	Actually It was meant to be humor. I think you're taking yourself too seriously :-) I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Post #58,510 by Brandioch 10/22/02 5:57:37 PM Reply	And when you've been beaten and you know it..... claim you were just joking. hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahaha
Post #58,520 by Mike 10/22/02 6:20:19 PM Reply	Context your honor........ Context......... CONTEXT! Now THAT'S funny. Will a claim that I was just joking get me out of it? No I didn't think so. Do you really think I would believe that for a second? No I didn't think so. Let's just suppose you're right. I give it to you that I misquoted you. Is that IT? Is that the best you've got to crow over. C'mon. Come ON! Can we talk about more interesting things about which you are unequivicolly wrong? If so, I'll concede on this point that you are right. Ummmm naaaaaaaaaaaaah I won't give it to you. Can't do it. You claim that you were simply re-phrasing Bill Patients remarks and you wanted no part of the point? Bullshit and you know it. The problem is this. If you had ANY problem whatsoever with the "friendly" moniker you would have been all over that shit like white on rice. But you weren't were you? The reason.........that was your position... not only Bill's. "So, we're friends with Kuwait." Your words. Period. You didn't just repeat his point...you repeated it and used it in support of your desire to point out your belief about Uzbekistan. Your post reads like freakin' gibberish if you genuinely thought Kuwait was not friendly. Why even bother to include Kuwait and pair it off with Israel? You are being disingenuous in your careful interpretation of what you think you can claim to have said. My position is that you are lying. Yes I am calling you a liar. (I learned this technique from you). I concede you nothing. P.S. Didn't I already tell you about using "ah" to try to make yourself sound clever? It works the other way around too. I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Post #58,549 by Brandioch 10/22/02 6:47:12 PM Reply	No, now you need "reading with comprehension". Let's just suppose you're right. I give it to you that I misquoted you. Is that IT? Is that the best you've got to crow over. C'mon. Come ON! Nope. #1. You didn't understand what I meant by "friendly" in reference to Kuwait. #2. You claimed I was inconsistent and that I had, previously, claimed that Kuwait was friendly (no quotes). #3. You went and found a previous post of mine where I had typed that BUT YOU COMPLETELY MISSED THE CONTEXT OF THE POST and that specific line. #4. When it FINALLY became too much, even for you, to deny, you claimed you were joking. #5. THEN, you want it to be ME who reacted weird when YOU "misquoted" me. #6. NOW! You STILL want to argue over whether I should have disproven Mr. Pathetic's statement about Kuwait when I was illustrating his lack of knowledge regarding that region. Ummmm naaaaaaaaaaaaah I won't give it to you. Can't do it. You claim that you were simply re-phrasing Bill Patients remarks and you wanted no part of the point? Bullshit and you know it. The problem is this. If you had ANY problem whatsoever with the "friendly" moniker you would have been all over that shit like white on rice. But you weren't were you? The reason.........that was your position... not only Bill's. So, I've already established that you don't understand what was meant by Kuwait being "friendly".. -and- I've established that you couldn't understand the CONTEXT of my post that you linked to.... -YET- You're going to argue what my position was regarding Kuwait in the post that you've linked? You don't understand sarcasm or context yet you claim to know what my position is? My position is that you are lying. Yes I am calling you a liar. (I learned this technique from you). Wonderful. Ummmmmmm, isn't that similar to what you accused me of earlier? Well, yes, I think it is. I couldn't be a LIAR if I didn't claim that I wasn't claiming that Kuwait was a friend of the US's after I'd just used sarcasm when refering to Kuwait as a "friend". Since you've lost on the CONTEXT issue, you'll claim that you understand what my original position was regarding Kuwait. hahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahhaahhaahhahahahaha! You can't even understand my position when I put "friendly" in QUOTES! Yet you can deduce my position based upon what I don't make a point of disagreeing with? hahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahaha! You are being disingenuous in your careful interpretation of what you think you can claim to have said. What I THINK I can CLAIM to have SAID? Ummm, there's this thing called a "link". I think you might be familiar with it. Am I too esoteric in my phrasing for you? No. No the kid. Rather, since you've been beaten SO BADLY! (and PUBLICLY)..... You're going to narrow your focus sooooooo much that you'll take ONE SENTENCE from me........ OUT OF CONTEXT and deduce my opinion from that. But, wasn't CONTEXT one of the things (besides sarcasm) that I have demonstrated you do NOT understand? hahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaha! Keep it up!
Post #58,583 by Mike 10/22/02 8:09:51 PM Reply	Yes You are correct. I have been beaten. Very bady. And very publicly. I must hand it to you. You are an AWESOME debater! (No cynicism intended) -Mike I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Post #58,585 by Mike 10/22/02 8:12:16 PM Reply	And... ...yes, I did hunt and peck for your reference to Kuwait. I did misinterpret what you said. I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Post #58,586 by Mike 10/22/02 8:13:10 PM Reply	And... ...this is how its supposed to go in a healthy forum.... I'm inclined to think. I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Post #58,628 by boxley 10/22/02 10:30:46 PM Reply	Rofl wonder how long he will right shift before he realizes he's been brandisized! reminds me been a while, thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] "Therefore, by objective standards, the leading managers of the U.S. economy...are collectively, clinically insane." Lyndon LaRouche
Post #58,666 by Mike 10/23/02 12:17:52 AM Reply	I don't mind losing a battle to Brandi He's kicked my ass before. As I have his. (Getting him to admit it is something else entirely tho) I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.

Welcome to IWETHEY!