IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Arts and Entertainment Forum / workaround include that AI in a corporation and have the corporation copyright the material
Post #442,972
by boxley
4/27/23 11:59:12 AM
4/27/23 11:59:12 AM
Reply
New workaround include that AI in a corporation and have the corporation copyright the material
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
     Well, so much for my plan to make a fortune out of these things - (rcareaga) - (26) - April 27, 2023, 10:17:17 AM EDT
         Of course I have an opinion - (drook) - (3) - April 27, 2023, 11:10:35 AM EDT
             I wonder how this applies to code generators? - (crazy) - (2) - April 27, 2023, 01:31:23 PM EDT
                 Or compilers - (drook) - April 27, 2023, 02:07:51 PM EDT
                 In my line of argumentation, that's cut and dry: - (CRConrad) - April 28, 2023, 02:27:57 AM EDT
         workaround include that AI in a corporation and have the corporation copyright the material -NT - (boxley) - April 27, 2023, 11:59:12 AM EDT
         I'm with the CO and its teeming myriads. - (CRConrad) - (15) - April 27, 2023, 12:06:14 PM EDT
             Quibble - (malraux) - (3) - April 27, 2023, 01:32:03 PM EDT
                 So should the copyright to the result belong to... - (CRConrad) - (2) - May 2, 2023, 09:40:18 AM EDT
                     Hence "quibble" instead of "substantive argument" ;-) -NT - (malraux) - (1) - May 2, 2023, 11:59:25 AM EDT
                         👍🏻 -NT - (CRConrad) - May 2, 2023, 12:55:29 PM EDT
             What about landscape photos? - (drook) - (6) - April 27, 2023, 02:06:36 PM EDT
                 rofl sounds like a familiar argument -NT - (boxley) - (5) - April 27, 2023, 02:19:22 PM EDT
                     It sounds silly now, but painters used to say exactly that -NT - (drook) - (4) - April 27, 2023, 02:42:32 PM EDT
                         you wern't saying that a number of years ago -NT - (boxley) - (3) - April 29, 2023, 10:35:02 PM EDT
                             Which "that" was I not saying? -NT - (drook) - (2) - May 1, 2023, 10:21:56 AM EDT
                                 Re: Which "that" was I not saying? - (boxley) - (1) - May 1, 2023, 03:34:33 PM EDT
                                     First difference I can think of is IP vs physical - (drook) - May 1, 2023, 04:07:08 PM EDT
             Jackson sucking on that - (rcareaga) - (3) - April 27, 2023, 05:49:20 PM EDT
                 "This"? - (CRConrad) - (2) - April 28, 2023, 02:32:14 AM EDT
                     Hmm, now that you've prompted me to think more about it ... - (drook) - (1) - April 28, 2023, 12:37:38 PM EDT
                         Depends on how you count coup on the trump. - (CRConrad) - April 30, 2023, 05:31:42 AM EDT
         For the defense - (rcareaga) - (3) - April 27, 2023, 08:05:13 PM EDT
             The thing about "in the style of ..." - (drook) - (2) - April 28, 2023, 12:17:38 AM EDT
                 I have a Greg cherry hologram - (crazy) - (1) - April 28, 2023, 05:42:33 PM EDT
                     But if someone *could* reproduce it ... - (drook) - May 1, 2023, 10:19:58 AM EDT
         I think you're Ok, if this story is correct. - (Another Scott) - April 30, 2023, 10:28:56 AM EDT

iwethey.org
Powered by genetically engineered cyber-goats!
55 ms