IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New What about landscape photos?
The photographer didn't build the mountain.

They didn't carve the river.

They didn't arrange the clouds.

They didn't produce the sun.

All they did was stand there and press the button. Anyone can stand. Anyone can press a button. I guess I can start selling Ansel Adams prints.
--

Drew
New rofl sounds like a familiar argument
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New It sounds silly now, but painters used to say exactly that
--

Drew
New you wern't saying that a number of years ago
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New Which "that" was I not saying?
--

Drew
New Re: Which "that" was I not saying?
The business owner didn't build the roads.

They didn't install the electricity.

etc,etc
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New First difference I can think of is IP vs physical
If I sample a beat into a new song, the original still exists. If I run my fleet of trucks over the public highways, I'm causing actual damage to that road that will need to be maintained.

I'm sure there's more differences, but that's enough to make the comparison moot.
--

Drew
     Well, so much for my plan to make a fortune out of these things - (rcareaga) - (26)
         Of course I have an opinion - (drook) - (3)
             I wonder how this applies to code generators? - (crazy) - (2)
                 Or compilers - (drook)
                 In my line of argumentation, that's cut and dry: - (CRConrad)
         workaround include that AI in a corporation and have the corporation copyright the material -NT - (boxley)
         I'm with the CO and its teeming myriads. - (CRConrad) - (15)
             Quibble - (malraux) - (3)
                 So should the copyright to the result belong to... - (CRConrad) - (2)
                     Hence "quibble" instead of "substantive argument" ;-) -NT - (malraux) - (1)
                         👍🏻 -NT - (CRConrad)
             What about landscape photos? - (drook) - (6)
                 rofl sounds like a familiar argument -NT - (boxley) - (5)
                     It sounds silly now, but painters used to say exactly that -NT - (drook) - (4)
                         you wern't saying that a number of years ago -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                             Which "that" was I not saying? -NT - (drook) - (2)
                                 Re: Which "that" was I not saying? - (boxley) - (1)
                                     First difference I can think of is IP vs physical - (drook)
             Jackson sucking on that - (rcareaga) - (3)
                 "This"? - (CRConrad) - (2)
                     Hmm, now that you've prompted me to think more about it ... - (drook) - (1)
                         Depends on how you count coup on the trump. - (CRConrad)
         For the defense - (rcareaga) - (3)
             The thing about "in the style of ..." - (drook) - (2)
                 I have a Greg cherry hologram - (crazy) - (1)
                     But if someone *could* reproduce it ... - (drook)
         I think you're Ok, if this story is correct. - (Another Scott)

And if you do find me there, you won't be able to afford me.
62 ms